saturn

/home/coolhand/html/datavis/data_trove/data/healthcare/cms_hospitals_2025.csv 5,421 rows sample n=5,421 seed 42 2026-06-22T00:06:24+00:00

Overview

Source/home/coolhand/html/datavis/data_trove/data/healthcare/cms_hospitals_2025.csv
Total rows5,421
Profiled sample5,421
Columns38
Generated2026-06-22T00:06:24+00:00
Show data table
Per-column null rate across the corpus.
columnkindnull %
Facility IDtext0.0%
Facility Nametext0.0%
Addresstext0.0%
City/Towntext0.0%
Statecategorical0.0%
ZIP Codenumeric0.0%
County/Parishtext0.0%
Telephone Numbertext0.0%
Hospital Typecategorical0.0%
Hospital Ownershipcategorical0.0%
Emergency Servicescategorical0.0%
Meets criteria for birthing friendly designationcategorical58.2%
Hospital overall ratingcategorical0.0%
Hospital overall rating footnotecategorical52.7%
MORT Group Measure Countcategorical0.0%
Count of Facility MORT Measurescategorical0.0%
Count of MORT Measures Bettercategorical0.0%
Count of MORT Measures No Differentcategorical0.0%
Count of MORT Measures Worsecategorical0.0%
MORT Group Footnotenumeric67.2%
Safety Group Measure Countcategorical0.0%
Count of Facility Safety Measurescategorical0.0%
Count of Safety Measures Bettercategorical0.0%
Count of Safety Measures No Differentcategorical0.0%
Count of Safety Measures Worsecategorical0.0%
Safety Group Footnotenumeric61.8%
READM Group Measure Countcategorical0.0%
Count of Facility READM Measurescategorical0.0%
Count of READM Measures Bettercategorical0.0%
Count of READM Measures No Differentcategorical0.0%
Count of READM Measures Worsecategorical0.0%
READM Group Footnotenumeric78.8%
Pt Exp Group Measure Countcategorical0.0%
Count of Facility Pt Exp Measurescategorical0.0%
Pt Exp Group Footnotenumeric58.2%
TE Group Measure Countcategorical0.0%
Count of Facility TE Measurescategorical0.0%
TE Group Footnotenumeric82.9%

Insights opt-in

Model-generated narrative. These are opinions, not facts — the stats below are what saturn measured. Generated by: anthropic:default.

Dataset high anthropic:default

This dataset is a 2025 CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) registry of 5,421 U.S. hospitals, covering identity, location, ownership type, and performance ratings across mortality, readmission, safety, patient experience, and timely care measures. The most striking feature is that 47% of hospitals lack an overall star rating ('Not Available'), which severely limits any headline quality comparison and warrants investigation into which hospital types or states are disproportionately unrated. A second area worth scrutiny is ownership structure: voluntary non-profit private hospitals dominate at 42%, yet proprietary and government-run facilities make up a substantial share — cross-referencing ownership against star ratings could reveal systematic quality differences.

City/Town high anthropic:default

This column contains US city and town names, stored in ALL-CAPS format (99.4% allcaps rate), consistent with a standardized postal or administrative data source. With 3,049 unique values across 5,421 rows, the duplicate rate of 43.8% (2,372 duplicates) is expected for a geographic field — major cities like CHICAGO (34) and HOUSTON (31) naturally repeat. The near-complete one-word rate (77.1%) alongside multi-word entries like 'OKLAHOMA CITY' and 'LOS ANGELES' is normal for city names. No nulls are present, indicating good completeness.

County/Parish high anthropic:default

This column contains US county (or parish) names, stored entirely in uppercase (allcaps_rate 1.0), consistent with a standardised geographic reference field. With 1,555 unique values across 5,421 rows and a duplicate_rate of 0.7132, the same county names recur frequently — expected given that many records share common counties like LOS ANGELES (88), JEFFERSON (59), and COOK (59). The high one_word_rate (0.873) reflects that most US county names are single tokens, while multi-word entries like 'LOS ANGELES' and 'SAN ...' account for the remainder.

Facility ID high anthropic:default

This column is a fixed-length, zero-padded 6-character alphanumeric facility identifier — likely a government or regulatory facility code (e.g., CMS Facility ID or similar). Every one of the 5,421 rows has a distinct value with zero nulls and zero duplicates, confirming it functions as a primary key. All values are exactly 6 characters long (min, mean, max = 6) and fully uppercase, consistent with a structured code scheme. The top visible values follow a numeric sequence starting with '010001', suggesting geographic or administrative ordering.

TE Group Footnote high anthropic:default

This column encodes footnote reference numbers attached to a 'TE Group' field, taking only 3 distinct numeric values (5, 19, 22) across the entire dataset. 82.88% of rows are null, meaning footnotes apply to a small minority of records. The IQR of 0 and median/Q1/Q3 all equal to 19 confirm that value 19 dominates non-null entries, while values 5 and 22 appear rarely enough to generate 133 outliers (14.3% of non-null rows) and strong negative skew (−2.43).

Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation high anthropic:default

This column flags whether a facility meets criteria for a 'birthing friendly' designation, and every non-null value is 'Y' (top_rate = 1.0, cardinality = 1). That means it carries zero discriminative information among observed records — there are no 'N' values at all. More striking, 58.24% of rows are null, leaving only 2,264 usable observations out of 5,421; the nulls likely represent facilities that were not assessed or do not offer birthing services.

Telephone Number high anthropic:default

This column contains North American telephone numbers, all formatted uniformly at exactly 14 characters (consistent with the '(NXX) NXX-XXXX' pattern) with zero nulls across 5,421 records. The allcaps_rate of 1.0 is an artifact of digit/punctuation-only strings rather than alphabetic content. Surprisingly, 38 duplicate phone numbers exist (duplicate_rate ≈ 0.007), meaning distinct records share the same telephone number, which warrants investigation for data quality issues. Top area codes such as (406), (605), and (402) suggest a predominantly rural US geographic distribution.

Address high anthropic:default

This column contains physical street addresses, confirmed by dominant top words: 'street' (1,036), 'avenue' (580), 'drive' (511), 'road' (507), and directional prefixes like 'north', 'east', 'west', 'south'. Nearly all values are uppercased (99.2% allcaps_rate), consistent with address data sourced from a government registry or standardised mailing system. With 5,387 unique values out of 5,421 rows and only 34 duplicates (0.6% duplicate rate), the column is near-unique — the small number of duplicates may indicate shared addresses such as apartment buildings or data entry issues worth investigating.

Facility Name high anthropic:default

This column contains healthcare facility names — overwhelmingly hospitals and medical centers, as evidenced by 'hospital' appearing 2,740 times and 'medical'/'health'/'center' dominating the top-word list across 5,421 rows. Nearly all values are ALL-CAPS (99.3%), suggesting a standardized administrative data entry convention. The near-unique alert is noteworthy: with 5,286 unique values out of 5,421 rows (duplicate_rate 2.5%, 135 duplicates), some facilities appear more than once, which could indicate multiple records per facility rather than a clean one-row-per-facility structure. Average name length of ~29 characters and ~4 words per name is consistent with formal institutional naming patterns.

Pt Exp Group Footnote medium anthropic:default

This column appears to store numeric footnote codes attached to a patient experience group field, with only 3 distinct values (5, 19, and 22 inferred from min/Q1/Q3/max) acting as categorical tags rather than true measurements. The 58.18% null rate is flagged as an alert, meaning footnotes are absent for the majority of records — consistent with footnotes being exception annotations rather than universal attributes. The platykurtic distribution (kurtosis −1.66) and the fact that Q1 equals the median and minimum (all 5.0) confirm the values cluster heavily at the lowest code, with the IQR of 14 spanning to 19.

Safety Group Footnote high anthropic:default

This column encodes footnote reference numbers attached to safety groups, with only 4 distinct integer values (5, 19, 23, and at least one other given the IQR and mean) acting as categorical codes rather than true continuous quantities. The 61.8% null rate is a major signal: most records carry no footnote, making non-null values the exception. The platykurtic distribution (kurtosis ≈ −1.81) and near-zero skew confirm a flat, discrete distribution across a handful of categories, not a numeric measurement. Despite being stored as numeric, this should be treated as a sparse categorical indicator.

MORT Group Footnote high anthropic:default

This column contains footnote codes associated with a mortality (MORT) group, encoded as numeric values despite functioning as a categorical label. With only 4 unique values (5.0, and likely 19.0, 23.0, and one other near the mean) drawn from a set bounded by 5–23, this is clearly a small enumeration of footnote categories rather than a true numeric measure. The 67.2% null rate is the dominant signal — meaning footnotes apply to fewer than a third of rows, suggesting they flag exceptional or conditional cases. The near-flat kurtosis (−1.96) and bimodal-like IQR of 14.0 confirm the values are widely spread across only a few discrete codes.

READM Group Footnote high anthropic:default

This column is a coded footnote indicator for a readmission (READM) metric group, taking only 3 distinct numeric values (5, 19, 22) despite 5,421 rows. The 78.79% null rate is the dominant signal — nulls almost certainly mean 'no footnote applies', making non-null values the exception rather than the rule. The three values are likely lookup codes referencing a footnote legend (e.g., CMS suppression or reliability flags), not a continuous numeric measure, despite being stored as numeric.

Hospital overall rating footnote high anthropic:default

This column contains footnote codes attached to hospital overall ratings, where each numeric code references a specific explanatory note (e.g., data suppression reason, insufficient data, or special methodology). The 52.7% null rate is expected since most hospitals with valid ratings require no footnote. However, among non-null rows, value '16' dominates at 65.4% of present values (1,676 occurrences), suggesting a single suppression or caveat reason is overwhelmingly common; the presence of a compound value '16, 23' indicates some records carry multiple footnote codes, which could complicate downstream parsing.

ZIP Code high anthropic:default

This column contains US postal (ZIP) codes stored as integers rather than strings, covering the full national range from 603 (Puerto Rico/Northeast) to 99929 (Alaska), with 4721 distinct values across 5421 rows. The numeric treatment is problematic: leading zeros are silently dropped (the minimum of 603 almost certainly represents 00603), making string-based joins or lookups unreliable. The near-flat kurtosis (−0.99) and low skew (−0.16) indicate fairly broad geographic spread with no dominant regional cluster, which is notable given the wide IQR of 43333.

Count of Facility MORT Measures high anthropic:default

This column records how many mortality quality measures are reported for a given facility, taking integer values 1–7 plus a sentinel string 'Not Available'. Despite being numeric in nature, it was parsed as categorical, likely because of that mixed-type sentinel. Surprisingly, 'Not Available' is the single most frequent value at 32.8% (1,777 of 5,421 rows), meaning roughly a third of facilities have no mortality measure count on record. The remaining values are fairly evenly spread across 1–7, suggesting the missingness is not random but tied to whether a facility participates in mortality reporting at all.

Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures high anthropic:default

This column represents a count of facility patient experience measures, but despite its numeric-sounding name it is stored as a categorical with only 2 distinct values: '8' (58.2% of rows, n=3,154) and 'Not Available' (41.8%, n=2,267). The near-uniform presence of a single numeric value ('8') suggests this count is fixed or standardized across facilities that report it, making the column effectively a binary indicator of data availability rather than a meaningful numeric measure. No nulls exist; missingness is encoded as the string 'Not Available'.

Count of Facility READM Measures high anthropic:default

This column represents the count of readmission measures available for a healthcare facility, stored as a categorical/string type despite containing numeric values. The most striking signal is that 'Not Available' is the dominant value at 21.2% of all 5,421 rows (1,150 records), meaning roughly one-in-five facilities have no reportable readmission measure count. The remaining values span a narrow integer range (at least 2–11 visible), with near-uniform distribution across them given the high entropy ratio of 0.965, suggesting facilities tend to report varying but substantive numbers of measures.

Count of Facility Safety Measures high anthropic:default

This column represents an ordinal count of safety measures implemented at a facility, stored as a categorical/string type with values ranging from 1 to 8. The most striking signal is that 38.1% of the 5,421 rows (2,065 records) carry the value 'Not Available', which is the single largest category and likely reflects missing or unreported data rather than a meaningful category. The numeric values show a non-uniform distribution, with '7' being the most common true count (733 occurrences) and '4' the rarest (223), suggesting a rough bimodal tendency toward higher counts. The column should be treated as ordinal numeric after separating out 'Not Available' as a distinct missingness indicator.

Count of Facility TE Measures high anthropic:default

This column represents the number of Technical Efficiency (TE) measures recorded per facility, stored as a categorical/string type despite being fundamentally numeric with integer values ranging at least from 4 to 12. The most surprising signal is that 'Not Available' is the single most frequent value at 17.1% (928 of 5421 rows), indicating a meaningful data-availability gap that is structurally encoded as a string sentinel rather than a null — zero nulls are reported. Entropy ratio of 0.93 across only 13 categories suggests a near-uniform distribution among the numeric values, with no strong concentration beyond the 'Not Available' category.

Count of MORT Measures Better high anthropic:default

This column encodes how many mortality (MORT) measures a hospital performs better than the national benchmark, stored as a categorical string despite being an ordinal count ranging from 0 to 7. The dominant value is '0' (3,136 rows, 57.8%), meaning most hospitals beat no mortality benchmarks, while 1,777 rows (32.8%) are 'Not Available', leaving only ~9.4% of hospitals showing any above-average mortality performance. The absence of value '6' except for a single record and the jump from '5' to '7' (skipping '6' effectively) signals a highly right-skewed, near-zero distribution with a substantial missingness class masquerading as a category.

Count of MORT Measures No Different high anthropic:default

This column represents a count of mortality (MORT) measures where a hospital's performance was rated 'No Different' from the national benchmark, stored as a categorical string rather than a numeric type. The most striking signal is that 32.8% of rows (1,777 of 5,421) carry 'Not Available', effectively a masked null despite the reported null_rate of 0.0. The numeric values range from 0 to 7, with '0' being extremely rare (only 12 occurrences), suggesting nearly all reporting hospitals have at least one mortality measure in this category.

Count of MORT Measures Worse high anthropic:default

This column counts how many mortality (MORT) quality measures a hospital scored 'worse than expected' on, stored as a categorical string rather than an integer. The dominant value is '0' (3,266 rows, 60.2%), indicating most hospitals have no worse-than-expected mortality flags, but 1,777 rows (32.8%) carry 'Not Available', which is a substantial missingness proxy masked by a zero null_rate. Only 378 hospitals have one or more worse measures, and the counts are right-skewed, topping out at 5.

Count of READM Measures Better high anthropic:default

This column represents a small integer count (0–5) of how many readmission measures a hospital performed 'better' than a national benchmark, stored as a categorical/string field. The dominant value is '0' at 61.5% (3,332 rows), meaning most hospitals beat no readmission benchmarks at all. Notably, 1,150 rows (21.2%) carry 'Not Available' rather than a numeric zero, signalling a data-availability distinction that must be resolved before any numeric analysis.

Count of READM Measures No Different high anthropic:default

This column represents the count of readmission measures rated 'No Different' from the national rate for a given hospital, with valid integer values ranging from 1 to at least 9 (cardinality 13 suggests values up to ~12). The most striking signal is that 'Not Available' is the single most frequent value at 21.2% (1,150 of 5,421 rows), meaning roughly one in five hospitals has no reportable count — this non-numeric sentinel is stored as a string, making the column categorical despite its inherently ordinal numeric nature. Among reportable hospitals, the distribution across counts 1–9 is remarkably flat (372–497 each), suggesting no strong clustering around a typical score. The high entropy ratio (0.92) reflects this near-uniform spread across the 13 distinct values.

Count of READM Measures Worse high anthropic:default

This column records the number of readmission quality measures on which a hospital performed worse than the national benchmark, stored as a categorical/string field despite being fundamentally ordinal-numeric. The dominant value is '0' (2,988 of 5,421 rows, 55.1%), indicating most facilities had no worse-than-average readmission measures, while 'Not Available' accounts for 1,150 rows (21.2%) — a substantial missingness masked by a zero null_rate. The numeric range spans 0–7, but the distribution is heavily right-skewed with only 3 hospitals scoring 6 or higher.

Count of Safety Measures Better high anthropic:default

This column represents a count of safety measures rated 'better' for a given entity (likely a healthcare facility or similar regulated site), stored as a categorical rather than numeric type. The dominant value is 'Not Available' at 38.1% of rows (2,065 of 5,421), which masks the underlying numeric distribution; among records with actual counts, the distribution is strongly right-skewed, with 1,548 zeros and only 3 records reaching the maximum value of 6. Analysts should be aware that the high 'Not Available' rate introduces substantial missingness risk if this field is coerced to numeric.

Count of Safety Measures No Different high anthropic:default

This column represents a count of safety measures rated as 'no different' (presumably compared to a benchmark), stored as a categorical type despite containing numeric-looking values 0–8. The dominant value is 'Not Available' at 38.1% of 5,421 rows (2,065 records), which is a significant missingness proxy masking as a category rather than a true null — notable since the null_rate is 0.0. The remaining values follow a rough bell-curve peaking at 5, with very sparse representation at the extremes (8 appears only 10 times, 0 only 20 times).

Count of Safety Measures Worse high anthropic:default

This column represents a count of safety measures that have deteriorated, stored as a categorical field with only 5 distinct values (0, 1, 2, 3, and 'Not Available'). The dominant value is '0' at 54.3% of rows (2,941 records), indicating most entities have no worsening safety measures, but 38.1% of rows (2,065) carry 'Not Available' rather than a numeric zero, suggesting a meaningful distinction between 'measured and none found' vs. 'not assessed'. The actual worsening counts (1–3) are rare and sharply drop off, with only 6 records reaching a count of 3.

Emergency Services high anthropic:default

This column is a binary flag indicating whether emergency services are present or available for a given record. The dominant value is 'Yes' at 83.1% (4505 of 5421 rows), making the distribution notably imbalanced — 'No' accounts for only 916 records (roughly 1-in-6). No nulls exist, and entropy of 0.655 reflects the skew away from a balanced 50/50 split.

Hospital Ownership high anthropic:default

This column captures the legal/operational ownership classification of hospitals, with 12 distinct categories across 5,421 records and no nulls. The dominant category is 'Voluntary non-profit - Private' at 42.3% (2,291 records), creating notable imbalance — the top value alone accounts for more than twice the second-largest category ('Proprietary' at 1,067). The entropy ratio of 0.72 indicates moderate but uneven spread across categories, with minority classes like 'Government - Federal' (44) and 'Physician' (74) being quite sparse.

Hospital Type high anthropic:default

This column classifies each hospital record into one of 8 facility-type categories, making it a standard categorical label for hospital segmentation. 'Acute Care Hospitals' dominates at 57.6% of records (3,120 of 5,421), creating notable class imbalance. The extreme tail is striking: 'Long-term' hospitals appear only 4 times, and 'Acute Care - Department of Defense' just 32 times, meaning minority classes may be statistically unreliable for subgroup analysis. There are no nulls and no unexpected values.

Hospital overall rating high anthropic:default

This column represents a CMS-style 1–5 star overall hospital rating, stored as a categorical field with 6 distinct values. The most striking finding is that 47.1% of all 5,421 rows carry the value 'Not Available', making missing ratings the single largest 'category'—outnumbering any numeric rating tier. Among hospitals that do have a rating, scores cluster around 3 and 4 (937 and 765 occurrences respectively), with the extremes (1 and 5) being relatively rare.

MORT Group Measure Count high anthropic:default

This column records the count of MORT (mortality) group measures evaluated per entity, with only two distinct values across 5,421 rows: '7' (dominant, 84.1%) and 'Not Available' (15.9%). The cardinality of 2 and the presence of 'Not Available' as the only alternative to '7' suggests this is effectively a binary flag — entities either have a full complement of 7 mortality measures or are excluded from measurement entirely. The 'Not Available' string rather than a true null (null_rate is 0.0) means missingness is encoded as a sentinel value and must be handled explicitly.

Pt Exp Group Measure Count high anthropic:default

This column records the count of patient experience group measures, but is stored as a categorical with only two distinct values: '8' (the actual measure count) and 'Not Available'. The dominant value '8' appears in 84.1% of rows (4,558 of 5,421), while 'Not Available' accounts for the remaining 15.9% (863 rows) — suggesting a structured survey instrument with a fixed number of measures for eligible facilities, and a meaningful missingness pattern for ineligible or non-reporting ones.

READM Group Measure Count high anthropic:default

This column represents the count of readmission group measures associated with a hospital record, stored as a categorical type despite being a numeric concept. It has only two distinct values across 5,421 rows: '11' (84.1% of records) and 'Not Available' (15.9%), with zero nulls. The near-total dominance of a single value '11' and the use of 'Not Available' as a sentinel string (rather than a true null) are both worth flagging — the column carries almost no discriminative power as a feature.

Safety Group Measure Count high anthropic:default

This column represents a count of safety group measures, but is typed as categorical with only two distinct values: '8' (a fixed numeric string) and 'Not Available'. The dominance of a single value '8' across 84.1% of 5,421 rows (4,558 occurrences) suggests this may be a schema-constrained field or a denormalized count that rarely varies. The presence of 'Not Available' as the only alternative (863 rows, ~15.9%) rather than a true numeric null is surprising and indicates missing data was encoded as a string sentinel rather than left null.

State high anthropic:default

This column contains US state abbreviations, covering 56 distinct values (50 states plus likely DC and US territories). The distribution is notably spread — entropy ratio of 0.917 indicates near-uniform coverage — but TX leads with 462 occurrences (8.5% of 5,421 rows), followed by CA (378) and FL (221), reflecting population-weighted representation. The cardinality of 56 slightly exceeding 50 states warrants a quick audit to confirm no invalid or duplicate codes exist.

TE Group Measure Count medium anthropic:default

This column represents a count of TE (likely Test/Treatment Episode) group measures, stored as a categorical rather than numeric type — a likely encoding artefact. It has only two distinct values across 5,421 rows: '12' (84.1% of rows) and 'Not Available' (15.9%), suggesting it is effectively a binary availability flag masquerading as a count. The dominance of a single numeric value '12' with no other numeric variation is surprising and implies the measure count may be fixed/standardised across records rather than truly variable.

Numeric correlation

Show data table
Pearson correlation across 6 numeric columns (values clipped to 2 decimals).
ZIP CodeMORT Group FootnoteSafety Group FootnoteREADM Group FootnotePt Exp Group FootnoteTE Group Footnote
ZIP Code+1.00-0.01-0.04-0.09-0.02+0.03
MORT Group Footnote-0.01+1.00+0.13+0.24+0.07+0.09
Safety Group Footnote-0.04+0.13+1.00+0.10+0.27-0.00
READM Group Footnote-0.09+0.24+0.10+1.00+0.06+0.07
Pt Exp Group Footnote-0.02+0.07+0.27+0.06+1.00+0.03
TE Group Footnote+0.03+0.09-0.00+0.07+0.03+1.00

Facility ID text

100.0% of rows are unique strings 100.0% rows are a single word 100.0% rows are all-caps 95th-percentile length under 20 chars
rows5,421
null0 (0.0%)
unique5,421
len_min6
len_max6
len_mean6.000
len_median6.000
len_p956.000
word_mean1.000
word_median1.000
n_empty0
n_duplicates0
duplicate_rate0.000
vocab_size5,421
readability_flesch_mean121.220
emoji_rate0.000
url_rate0.000
one_word_rate1.000
allcaps_rate1.000
boilerplate_rate0.000
Show data table
Character-length distribution for Facility ID (mean: 6.0).
charscount
6 – 60
6 – 60
6 – 60
6 – 60
6 – 60
6 – 60
6 – 60
6 – 60
6 – 60
6 – 60
6 – 60
6 – 60
6 – 60
6 – 60
6 – 60
6 – 60
6 – 60
6 – 60
6 – 60
6 – 60
6 – 65421
6 – 60
6 – 60
6 – 60
6 – 60
6 – 60
6 – 60
6 – 60
6 – 60
6 – 60
6 – 60
6 – 60
6 – 60
6 – 60
6 – 60
6 – 60
6 – 60
6 – 60
6 – 60
6 – 60
Sample values (first 10)
  1. 010012
  2. 390272
  3. 450855
  4. 444002
  5. 220019
  6. 521300
  7. 230021
  8. 454152
  9. 444026
  10. 030152

Facility Name text

97.5% of rows are unique strings 99.3% rows are all-caps
rows5,421
null0 (0.0%)
unique5,286
len_min3
len_max74
len_mean29.206
len_median28.000
len_p9545.000
word_mean3.995
word_median4.000
n_empty0
n_duplicates135
duplicate_rate0.025
vocab_size3,942
readability_flesch_mean6.842
emoji_rate0.000
url_rate0.000
one_word_rate1.84e-03
allcaps_rate0.993
boilerplate_rate0.000
Show data table
Character-length distribution for Facility Name (mean: 29.20605054418004).
charscount
3 – 52
5 – 71
7 – 81
8 – 1011
10 – 1212
12 – 1443
14 – 1591
15 – 17178
17 – 1993
19 – 21258
21 – 23424
23 – 24526
24 – 26572
26 – 28258
28 – 30548
30 – 31525
31 – 33460
33 – 35160
35 – 37308
37 – 38232
38 – 40170
40 – 42149
42 – 4447
44 – 46105
46 – 4782
47 – 4979
49 – 5155
51 – 537
53 – 544
54 – 562
56 – 581
58 – 603
60 – 624
62 – 631
63 – 652
65 – 671
67 – 692
69 – 700
70 – 723
72 – 741
Sample values (first 10)
  1. DEKALB REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
  2. VALLEY FORGE MEDICAL CENTER
  3. HARLINGEN MEDICAL CENTER
  4. MOCCASIN BEND MENTAL HEALTH INSTITUTE
  5. UMASS MEMORIAL HEALTH - HARRINGTON HOSPITAL
  6. ASPIRUS EAGLE RIVER HOSPITAL
  7. LAKELAND HOSPITAL, ST JOSEPH
  8. CANYON CREEK BEHAVIORAL HEALTH
  9. ERLANGER BEHAVIORAL HOSPITAL, LLC
  10. EXCEPTIONAL COMMUNITY HOSPITAL - MARICOPA

Address text

99.4% of rows are unique strings 99.2% rows are all-caps
rows5,421
null0 (0.0%)
unique5,387
len_min7
len_max50
len_mean19.372
len_median19.000
len_p9529.000
word_mean3.754
word_median4.000
n_empty0
n_duplicates34
duplicate_rate6.27e-03
vocab_size4,996
readability_flesch_mean79.268
emoji_rate0.000
url_rate0.000
one_word_rate0.000
allcaps_rate0.992
boilerplate_rate0.000
Show data table
Character-length distribution for Address (mean: 19.371702637889687).
charscount
7 – 83
8 – 98
9 – 1032
10 – 1166
11 – 12115
12 – 13227
13 – 15288
15 – 16380
16 – 17481
17 – 18502
18 – 19541
19 – 20510
20 – 21413
21 – 22691
22 – 23257
23 – 24218
24 – 25151
25 – 26121
26 – 2773
27 – 2872
28 – 3052
30 – 3147
31 – 3234
32 – 3327
33 – 3415
34 – 3512
35 – 3634
36 – 3712
37 – 388
38 – 397
39 – 406
40 – 413
41 – 422
42 – 443
44 – 450
45 – 463
46 – 472
47 – 480
48 – 490
49 – 505
Sample values (first 10)
  1. 200 MED CENTER DRIVE
  2. 1033 WEST GERMANTOWN PIKE
  3. 5501 SOUTH EXPRESSWAY 77
  4. 100 MOCCASIN BEND ROAD
  5. 100 SOUTH STREET
  6. 201 HOSPITAL ROAD
  7. 1234 NAPIER AVENUE
  8. 1201 CANYON CREEK DR
  9. 804 NORTH HOLTZCLAW AVENUE
  10. 19060 NORTH JOHN WAYNE PARKWAY

City/Town text

77.1% rows are a single word 99.4% rows are all-caps 95th-percentile length under 20 chars 43.8% duplicate strings
rows5,421
null0 (0.0%)
unique3,049
len_min3
len_max24
len_mean8.611
len_median8.000
len_p9513.000
word_mean1.241
word_median1.000
n_empty0
n_duplicates2,372
duplicate_rate0.438
vocab_size2,890
readability_flesch_mean18.288
emoji_rate0.000
url_rate0.000
one_word_rate0.771
allcaps_rate0.994
boilerplate_rate0.000
Show data table
Character-length distribution for City/Town (mean: 8.610957387935805).
charscount
3 – 410
4 – 4122
4 – 50
5 – 5332
5 – 60
6 – 6761
6 – 70
7 – 7895
7 – 80
8 – 8737
8 – 90
9 – 9694
9 – 100
10 – 10705
10 – 110
11 – 11446
11 – 120
12 – 12295
12 – 130
13 – 14191
14 – 1498
14 – 150
15 – 1550
15 – 160
16 – 1654
16 – 170
17 – 1715
17 – 180
18 – 186
18 – 190
19 – 193
19 – 200
20 – 206
20 – 210
21 – 210
21 – 220
22 – 220
22 – 230
23 – 230
23 – 241
Sample values (first 10)
  1. FORT PAYNE
  2. NORRISTOWN
  3. HARLINGEN
  4. CHATTANOOGA
  5. SOUTHBRIDGE
  6. EAGLE RIVER
  7. ST JOSEPH
  8. TEMPLE
  9. CHATTANOOGA
  10. MARICOPA

State categorical

rows5,421
null0 (0.0%)
unique56
top_valueTX
top_rate0.085
cardinality56
entropy5.328
entropy_ratio0.917
Show data table
Top values for State (20 unique shown, of 56 total).
valuecountshare
TX4628.5%
CA3787.0%
FL2214.1%
IL1943.6%
OH1943.6%
NY1913.5%
PA1873.4%
LA1603.0%
GA1492.7%
IN1492.7%
MI1472.7%
WI1422.6%
KS1392.6%
MN1362.5%
OK1352.5%
TN1232.3%
MO1212.2%
NC1202.2%
IA1182.2%
AZ1062.0%
Top values (rank 1–20)
  1. TX — 462
  2. CA — 378
  3. FL — 221
  4. IL — 194
  5. OH — 194
  6. NY — 191
  7. PA — 187
  8. LA — 160
  9. GA — 149
  10. IN — 149
  11. MI — 147
  12. WI — 142
  13. KS — 139
  14. MN — 136
  15. OK — 135
  16. TN — 123
  17. MO — 121
  18. NC — 120
  19. IA — 118
  20. AZ — 106

ZIP Code numeric

rows5,421
null0 (0.0%)
unique4,721
min603.000
max99,929
mean53,780
median55,066
std27,064
q132,771
q376,104
iqr43,333
skew-0.165
kurtosis-0.988
n_outliers0
outlier_rate0.000
zero_rate0.000
Show data table
Histogram bins for ZIP Code (median: 55066.0).
bincount
603 – 3086161
3086 – 556973
5569 – 805292
8052 – 1.054e+0457
1.054e+04 – 1.302e+0490
1.302e+04 – 1.55e+04101
1.55e+04 – 1.799e+0481
1.799e+04 – 2.047e+04108
2.047e+04 – 2.295e+0479
2.295e+04 – 2.543e+0481
2.543e+04 – 2.792e+0482
2.792e+04 – 3.04e+04191
3.04e+04 – 3.288e+04171
3.288e+04 – 3.537e+04168
3.537e+04 – 3.785e+04151
3.785e+04 – 4.033e+04180
4.033e+04 – 4.282e+0487
4.282e+04 – 4.53e+04154
4.53e+04 – 4.778e+04174
4.778e+04 – 5.027e+04180
5.027e+04 – 5.275e+0498
5.275e+04 – 5.523e+04160
5.523e+04 – 5.772e+04175
5.772e+04 – 6.02e+04147
6.02e+04 – 6.268e+04140
6.268e+04 – 6.516e+04120
6.516e+04 – 6.765e+04133
6.765e+04 – 7.013e+04145
7.013e+04 – 7.261e+04205
7.261e+04 – 7.51e+04191
7.51e+04 – 7.758e+04236
7.758e+04 – 8.006e+04204
8.006e+04 – 8.255e+04103
8.255e+04 – 8.503e+04132
8.503e+04 – 8.751e+04106
8.751e+04 – 9e+0472
9e+04 – 9.248e+04140
9.248e+04 – 9.496e+04146
9.496e+04 – 9.745e+04159
9.745e+04 – 9.993e+04148

County/Parish text

87.3% rows are a single word 100.0% rows are all-caps 95th-percentile length under 20 chars 71.3% duplicate strings
rows5,421
null0 (0.0%)
unique1,555
len_min3
len_max25
len_mean7.340
len_median7.000
len_p9511.000
word_mean1.135
word_median1.000
n_empty0
n_duplicates3,866
duplicate_rate0.713
vocab_size1,591
readability_flesch_mean34.438
emoji_rate0.000
url_rate0.000
one_word_rate0.873
allcaps_rate1.000
boilerplate_rate0.000
Show data table
Character-length distribution for County/Parish (mean: 7.3399741745065485).
charscount
3 – 436
4 – 4472
4 – 50
5 – 5659
5 – 60
6 – 61008
6 – 70
7 – 7956
7 – 80
8 – 8834
8 – 9575
9 – 100
10 – 10430
10 – 110
11 – 11195
11 – 120
12 – 12101
12 – 130
13 – 1340
13 – 140
14 – 1575
15 – 1518
15 – 160
16 – 162
16 – 170
17 – 175
17 – 180
18 – 183
18 – 190
19 – 205
20 – 204
20 – 210
21 – 211
21 – 220
22 – 220
22 – 230
23 – 231
23 – 240
24 – 240
24 – 251
Sample values (first 10)
  1. DE KALB
  2. MONTGOMERY
  3. CAMERON
  4. HAMILTON
  5. WORCESTER
  6. VILAS
  7. BERRIEN
  8. BELL
  9. HAMILTON
  10. PINAL

Telephone Number text

99.3% of rows are unique strings 100.0% rows are all-caps 95th-percentile length under 20 chars
rows5,421
null0 (0.0%)
unique5,383
len_min14
len_max14
len_mean14.000
len_median14.000
len_p9514.000
word_mean2.000
word_median2.000
n_empty0
n_duplicates38
duplicate_rate7.01e-03
vocab_size5,550
readability_flesch_mean120.205
emoji_rate0.000
url_rate0.000
one_word_rate0.000
allcaps_rate1.000
boilerplate_rate0.000
Show data table
Character-length distribution for Telephone Number (mean: 14.0).
charscount
14 – 140
14 – 140
14 – 140
14 – 140
14 – 140
14 – 140
14 – 140
14 – 140
14 – 140
14 – 140
14 – 140
14 – 140
14 – 140
14 – 140
14 – 140
14 – 140
14 – 140
14 – 140
14 – 140
14 – 140
14 – 145421
14 – 140
14 – 140
14 – 140
14 – 140
14 – 140
14 – 140
14 – 140
14 – 140
14 – 140
14 – 140
14 – 140
14 – 140
14 – 140
14 – 140
14 – 140
14 – 140
14 – 140
14 – 140
14 – 140
Sample values (first 10)
  1. (256) 845-3150
  2. (610) 539-8500
  3. (956) 365-1000
  4. (423) 785-2271
  5. (508) 765-9771
  6. (715) 479-7411
  7. (269) 983-8300
  8. (512) 569-3261
  9. (877) 249-2737
  10. (910) 988-9080

Hospital Type categorical

rows5,421
null0 (0.0%)
unique8
top_valueAcute Care Hospitals
top_rate0.576
cardinality8
entropy1.654
entropy_ratio0.551
Show data table
Top values for Hospital Type (8 unique shown, of 8 total).
valuecountshare
Acute Care Hospitals312057.6%
Critical Access Hospitals137525.4%
Psychiatric62611.5%
Acute Care - Veterans Administration1322.4%
Childrens941.7%
Rural Emergency Hospital380.7%
Acute Care - Department of Defense320.6%
Long-term40.1%
Top values (rank 1–20)
  1. Acute Care Hospitals — 3,120
  2. Critical Access Hospitals — 1,375
  3. Psychiatric — 626
  4. Acute Care - Veterans Administration — 132
  5. Childrens — 94
  6. Rural Emergency Hospital — 38
  7. Acute Care - Department of Defense — 32
  8. Long-term — 4

Hospital Ownership categorical

rows5,421
null0 (0.0%)
unique12
top_valueVoluntary non-profit - Private
top_rate0.423
cardinality12
entropy2.586
entropy_ratio0.721
Show data table
Top values for Hospital Ownership (12 unique shown, of 12 total).
valuecountshare
Voluntary non-profit - Private229142.3%
Proprietary106719.7%
Government - Hospital District or Authority5219.6%
Government - Local4007.4%
Voluntary non-profit - Other3616.7%
Voluntary non-profit - Church2755.1%
Government - State2103.9%
Veterans Health Administration1322.4%
Physician741.4%
Government - Federal440.8%
Department of Defense320.6%
Tribal140.3%
Top values (rank 1–20)
  1. Voluntary non-profit - Private — 2,291
  2. Proprietary — 1,067
  3. Government - Hospital District or Authority — 521
  4. Government - Local — 400
  5. Voluntary non-profit - Other — 361
  6. Voluntary non-profit - Church — 275
  7. Government - State — 210
  8. Veterans Health Administration — 132
  9. Physician — 74
  10. Government - Federal — 44
  11. Department of Defense — 32
  12. Tribal — 14

Emergency Services categorical

rows5,421
null0 (0.0%)
unique2
top_valueYes
top_rate0.831
cardinality2
entropy0.655
entropy_ratio0.655
Show data table
Top values for Emergency Services (2 unique shown, of 2 total).
valuecountshare
Yes450583.1%
No91616.9%
Top values (rank 1–20)
  1. Yes — 4,505
  2. No — 916

Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation categorical

58.2% null top value is 100.0% of rows
rows5,421
null3,157 (58.2%)
unique1
top_valueY
top_rate1.000
cardinality1
entropy-0.000
entropy_ratio0.000
Show data table
Top values for Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation (1 unique shown, of 1 total).
valuecountshare
Y226441.8%
Top values (rank 1–20)
  1. Y — 2,264

Hospital overall rating categorical

rows5,421
null0 (0.0%)
unique6
top_valueNot Available
top_rate0.471
cardinality6
entropy2.133
entropy_ratio0.825
Show data table
Top values for Hospital overall rating (6 unique shown, of 6 total).
valuecountshare
Not Available255247.1%
393717.3%
476514.1%
264912.0%
52895.3%
12294.2%
Top values (rank 1–20)
  1. Not Available — 2,552
  2. 3 — 937
  3. 4 — 765
  4. 2 — 649
  5. 5 — 289
  6. 1 — 229

Hospital overall rating footnote categorical

52.7% null
rows5,421
null2,857 (52.7%)
unique7
top_value16
top_rate0.654
cardinality7
entropy1.158
entropy_ratio0.413
Show data table
Top values for Hospital overall rating footnote (7 unique shown, of 7 total).
valuecountshare
16167630.9%
1979514.7%
5470.9%
22320.6%
1770.1%
2350.1%
16, 2320.0%
Top values (rank 1–20)
  1. 16 — 1,676
  2. 19 — 795
  3. 5 — 47
  4. 22 — 32
  5. 17 — 7
  6. 23 — 5
  7. 16, 23 — 2

MORT Group Measure Count categorical

rows5,421
null0 (0.0%)
unique2
top_value7
top_rate0.841
cardinality2
entropy0.632
entropy_ratio0.632
Show data table
Top values for MORT Group Measure Count (2 unique shown, of 2 total).
valuecountshare
7455884.1%
Not Available86315.9%
Top values (rank 1–20)
  1. 7 — 4,558
  2. Not Available — 863

Count of Facility MORT Measures categorical

rows5,421
null0 (0.0%)
unique8
top_valueNot Available
top_rate0.328
cardinality8
entropy2.765
entropy_ratio0.922
Show data table
Top values for Count of Facility MORT Measures (8 unique shown, of 8 total).
valuecountshare
Not Available177732.8%
785015.7%
658710.8%
14959.1%
54558.4%
34448.2%
24207.7%
43937.2%
Top values (rank 1–20)
  1. Not Available — 1,777
  2. 7 — 850
  3. 6 — 587
  4. 1 — 495
  5. 5 — 455
  6. 3 — 444
  7. 2 — 420
  8. 4 — 393

Count of MORT Measures Better categorical

rows5,421
null0 (0.0%)
unique9
top_value0
top_rate0.578
cardinality9
entropy1.453
entropy_ratio0.458
Show data table
Top values for Count of MORT Measures Better (9 unique shown, of 9 total).
valuecountshare
0313657.8%
Not Available177732.8%
12975.5%
21332.5%
3531.0%
4150.3%
570.1%
720.0%
610.0%
Top values (rank 1–20)
  1. 0 — 3,136
  2. Not Available — 1,777
  3. 1 — 297
  4. 2 — 133
  5. 3 — 53
  6. 4 — 15
  7. 5 — 7
  8. 7 — 2
  9. 6 — 1

Count of MORT Measures No Different categorical

rows5,421
null0 (0.0%)
unique9
top_valueNot Available
top_rate0.328
cardinality9
entropy2.806
entropy_ratio0.885
Show data table
Top values for Count of MORT Measures No Different (9 unique shown, of 9 total).
valuecountshare
Not Available177732.8%
667212.4%
554110.0%
15139.5%
35099.4%
45039.3%
24728.7%
74227.8%
0120.2%
Top values (rank 1–20)
  1. Not Available — 1,777
  2. 6 — 672
  3. 5 — 541
  4. 1 — 513
  5. 3 — 509
  6. 4 — 503
  7. 2 — 472
  8. 7 — 422
  9. 0 — 12

Count of MORT Measures Worse categorical

rows5,421
null0 (0.0%)
unique7
top_value0
top_rate0.602
cardinality7
entropy1.294
entropy_ratio0.461
Show data table
Top values for Count of MORT Measures Worse (7 unique shown, of 7 total).
valuecountshare
0326660.2%
Not Available177732.8%
13105.7%
2571.1%
370.1%
430.1%
510.0%
Top values (rank 1–20)
  1. 0 — 3,266
  2. Not Available — 1,777
  3. 1 — 310
  4. 2 — 57
  5. 3 — 7
  6. 4 — 3
  7. 5 — 1

MORT Group Footnote numeric

67.2% null
rows5,421
null3,643 (67.2%)
unique4
min5.000
max23.000
mean11.576
median5.000
std7.057
q15.000
q319.000
iqr14.000
skew0.149
kurtosis-1.959
n_outliers0
outlier_rate0.000
zero_rate0.000
Show data table
Histogram bins for MORT Group Footnote (median: 5.0).
bincount
5 – 5.45950
5.45 – 5.90
5.9 – 6.350
6.35 – 6.80
6.8 – 7.250
7.25 – 7.70
7.7 – 8.150
8.15 – 8.60
8.6 – 9.050
9.05 – 9.50
9.5 – 9.950
9.95 – 10.40
10.4 – 10.850
10.85 – 11.30
11.3 – 11.750
11.75 – 12.20
12.2 – 12.650
12.65 – 13.10
13.1 – 13.550
13.55 – 140
14 – 14.450
14.45 – 14.90
14.9 – 15.350
15.35 – 15.80
15.8 – 16.250
16.25 – 16.70
16.7 – 17.150
17.15 – 17.60
17.6 – 18.050
18.05 – 18.50
18.5 – 18.950
18.95 – 19.4795
19.4 – 19.850
19.85 – 20.30
20.3 – 20.750
20.75 – 21.20
21.2 – 21.650
21.65 – 22.132
22.1 – 22.550
22.55 – 231

Safety Group Measure Count categorical

rows5,421
null0 (0.0%)
unique2
top_value8
top_rate0.841
cardinality2
entropy0.632
entropy_ratio0.632
Show data table
Top values for Safety Group Measure Count (2 unique shown, of 2 total).
valuecountshare
8455884.1%
Not Available86315.9%
Top values (rank 1–20)
  1. 8 — 4,558
  2. Not Available — 863

Count of Facility Safety Measures categorical

rows5,421
null0 (0.0%)
unique9
top_valueNot Available
top_rate0.381
cardinality9
entropy2.753
entropy_ratio0.868
Show data table
Top values for Count of Facility Safety Measures (9 unique shown, of 9 total).
valuecountshare
Not Available206538.1%
773313.5%
25199.6%
64608.5%
84538.4%
14438.2%
32905.3%
52354.3%
42234.1%
Top values (rank 1–20)
  1. Not Available — 2,065
  2. 7 — 733
  3. 2 — 519
  4. 6 — 460
  5. 8 — 453
  6. 1 — 443
  7. 3 — 290
  8. 5 — 235
  9. 4 — 223

Count of Safety Measures Better categorical

rows5,421
null0 (0.0%)
unique8
top_valueNot Available
top_rate0.381
cardinality8
entropy2.110
entropy_ratio0.703
Show data table
Top values for Count of Safety Measures Better (8 unique shown, of 8 total).
valuecountshare
Not Available206538.1%
0154828.6%
1105219.4%
24307.9%
32164.0%
4931.7%
5140.3%
630.1%
Top values (rank 1–20)
  1. Not Available — 2,065
  2. 0 — 1,548
  3. 1 — 1,052
  4. 2 — 430
  5. 3 — 216
  6. 4 — 93
  7. 5 — 14
  8. 6 — 3

Count of Safety Measures No Different categorical

rows5,421
null0 (0.0%)
unique10
top_valueNot Available
top_rate0.381
cardinality10
entropy2.685
entropy_ratio0.808
Show data table
Top values for Count of Safety Measures No Different (10 unique shown, of 10 total).
valuecountshare
Not Available206538.1%
565612.1%
255110.2%
45279.7%
15099.4%
64828.9%
34348.0%
71673.1%
0200.4%
8100.2%
Top values (rank 1–20)
  1. Not Available — 2,065
  2. 5 — 656
  3. 2 — 551
  4. 4 — 527
  5. 1 — 509
  6. 6 — 482
  7. 3 — 434
  8. 7 — 167
  9. 0 — 20
  10. 8 — 10

Count of Safety Measures Worse categorical

rows5,421
null0 (0.0%)
unique5
top_value0
top_rate0.543
cardinality5
entropy1.338
entropy_ratio0.576
Show data table
Top values for Count of Safety Measures Worse (5 unique shown, of 5 total).
valuecountshare
0294154.3%
Not Available206538.1%
13656.7%
2440.8%
360.1%
Top values (rank 1–20)
  1. 0 — 2,941
  2. Not Available — 2,065
  3. 1 — 365
  4. 2 — 44
  5. 3 — 6

Safety Group Footnote numeric

61.8% null
rows5,421
null3,350 (61.8%)
unique4
min5.000
max23.000
mean10.689
median5.000
std6.950
q15.000
q319.000
iqr14.000
skew0.412
kurtosis-1.809
n_outliers0
outlier_rate0.000
zero_rate0.000
Show data table
Histogram bins for Safety Group Footnote (median: 5.0).
bincount
5 – 5.451238
5.45 – 5.90
5.9 – 6.350
6.35 – 6.80
6.8 – 7.250
7.25 – 7.70
7.7 – 8.150
8.15 – 8.60
8.6 – 9.050
9.05 – 9.50
9.5 – 9.950
9.95 – 10.40
10.4 – 10.850
10.85 – 11.30
11.3 – 11.750
11.75 – 12.20
12.2 – 12.650
12.65 – 13.10
13.1 – 13.550
13.55 – 140
14 – 14.450
14.45 – 14.90
14.9 – 15.350
15.35 – 15.80
15.8 – 16.250
16.25 – 16.70
16.7 – 17.150
17.15 – 17.60
17.6 – 18.050
18.05 – 18.50
18.5 – 18.950
18.95 – 19.4795
19.4 – 19.850
19.85 – 20.30
20.3 – 20.750
20.75 – 21.20
21.2 – 21.650
21.65 – 22.132
22.1 – 22.550
22.55 – 236

READM Group Measure Count categorical

rows5,421
null0 (0.0%)
unique2
top_value11
top_rate0.841
cardinality2
entropy0.632
entropy_ratio0.632
Show data table
Top values for READM Group Measure Count (2 unique shown, of 2 total).
valuecountshare
11455884.1%
Not Available86315.9%
Top values (rank 1–20)
  1. 11 — 4,558
  2. Not Available — 863

Count of Facility READM Measures categorical

rows5,421
null0 (0.0%)
unique12
top_valueNot Available
top_rate0.212
cardinality12
entropy3.459
entropy_ratio0.965
Show data table
Top values for Count of Facility READM Measures (12 unique shown, of 12 total).
valuecountshare
Not Available115021.2%
114989.2%
84668.6%
64388.1%
94257.8%
33756.9%
23746.9%
73586.6%
53476.4%
43356.2%
103336.1%
13225.9%
Top values (rank 1–20)
  1. Not Available — 1,150
  2. 11 — 498
  3. 8 — 466
  4. 6 — 438
  5. 9 — 425
  6. 3 — 375
  7. 2 — 374
  8. 7 — 358
  9. 5 — 347
  10. 4 — 335
  11. 10 — 333
  12. 1 — 322

Count of READM Measures Better categorical

rows5,421
null0 (0.0%)
unique7
top_value0
top_rate0.615
cardinality7
entropy1.510
entropy_ratio0.538
Show data table
Top values for Count of READM Measures Better (7 unique shown, of 7 total).
valuecountshare
0333261.5%
Not Available115021.2%
173713.6%
21613.0%
3280.5%
4100.2%
530.1%
Top values (rank 1–20)
  1. 0 — 3,332
  2. Not Available — 1,150
  3. 1 — 737
  4. 2 — 161
  5. 3 — 28
  6. 4 — 10
  7. 5 — 3

Count of READM Measures No Different categorical

rows5,421
null0 (0.0%)
unique13
top_valueNot Available
top_rate0.212
cardinality13
entropy3.408
entropy_ratio0.921
Show data table
Top values for Count of READM Measures No Different (13 unique shown, of 13 total).
valuecountshare
Not Available115021.2%
74979.2%
84919.1%
64808.9%
24287.9%
34287.9%
54267.9%
94187.7%
43987.3%
13726.9%
102494.6%
11811.5%
030.1%
Top values (rank 1–20)
  1. Not Available — 1,150
  2. 7 — 497
  3. 8 — 491
  4. 6 — 480
  5. 2 — 428
  6. 3 — 428
  7. 5 — 426
  8. 9 — 418
  9. 4 — 398
  10. 1 — 372
  11. 10 — 249
  12. 11 — 81
  13. 0 — 3

Count of READM Measures Worse categorical

rows5,421
null0 (0.0%)
unique9
top_value0
top_rate0.551
cardinality9
entropy1.758
entropy_ratio0.555
Show data table
Top values for Count of READM Measures Worse (9 unique shown, of 9 total).
valuecountshare
0298855.1%
Not Available115021.2%
183915.5%
23085.7%
31051.9%
4260.5%
620.0%
520.0%
710.0%
Top values (rank 1–20)
  1. 0 — 2,988
  2. Not Available — 1,150
  3. 1 — 839
  4. 2 — 308
  5. 3 — 105
  6. 4 — 26
  7. 6 — 2
  8. 5 — 2
  9. 7 — 1

READM Group Footnote numeric

78.8% null
rows5,421
null4,271 (78.8%)
unique3
min5.000
max22.000
mean15.151
median19.000
std6.366
q15.000
q319.000
iqr14.000
skew-0.953
kurtosis-1.051
n_outliers0
outlier_rate0.000
zero_rate0.000
Show data table
Histogram bins for READM Group Footnote (median: 19.0).
bincount
5 – 5.515323
5.515 – 6.030
6.03 – 6.5450
6.545 – 7.0610
7.061 – 7.5760
7.576 – 8.0910
8.091 – 8.6060
8.606 – 9.1210
9.121 – 9.6360
9.636 – 10.150
10.15 – 10.670
10.67 – 11.180
11.18 – 11.70
11.7 – 12.210
12.21 – 12.730
12.73 – 13.240
13.24 – 13.760
13.76 – 14.270
14.27 – 14.790
14.79 – 15.30
15.3 – 15.820
15.82 – 16.330
16.33 – 16.850
16.85 – 17.360
17.36 – 17.880
17.88 – 18.390
18.39 – 18.910
18.91 – 19.42795
19.42 – 19.940
19.94 – 20.450
20.45 – 20.970
20.97 – 21.480
21.48 – 2232

Pt Exp Group Measure Count categorical

rows5,421
null0 (0.0%)
unique2
top_value8
top_rate0.841
cardinality2
entropy0.632
entropy_ratio0.632
Show data table
Top values for Pt Exp Group Measure Count (2 unique shown, of 2 total).
valuecountshare
8455884.1%
Not Available86315.9%
Top values (rank 1–20)
  1. 8 — 4,558
  2. Not Available — 863

Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures categorical

rows5,421
null0 (0.0%)
unique2
top_value8
top_rate0.582
cardinality2
entropy0.981
entropy_ratio0.981
Show data table
Top values for Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures (2 unique shown, of 2 total).
valuecountshare
8315458.2%
Not Available226741.8%
Top values (rank 1–20)
  1. 8 — 3,154
  2. Not Available — 2,267

Pt Exp Group Footnote numeric

58.2% null
rows5,421
null3,154 (58.2%)
unique3
min5.000
max22.000
mean10.150
median5.000
std6.806
q15.000
q319.000
iqr14.000
skew0.571
kurtosis-1.658
n_outliers0
outlier_rate0.000
zero_rate0.000
Show data table
Histogram bins for Pt Exp Group Footnote (median: 5.0).
bincount
5 – 5.4251440
5.425 – 5.850
5.85 – 6.2750
6.275 – 6.70
6.7 – 7.1250
7.125 – 7.550
7.55 – 7.9750
7.975 – 8.40
8.4 – 8.8250
8.825 – 9.250
9.25 – 9.6750
9.675 – 10.10
10.1 – 10.520
10.52 – 10.950
10.95 – 11.380
11.38 – 11.80
11.8 – 12.220
12.22 – 12.650
12.65 – 13.070
13.07 – 13.50
13.5 – 13.920
13.92 – 14.350
14.35 – 14.780
14.78 – 15.20
15.2 – 15.620
15.62 – 16.050
16.05 – 16.480
16.48 – 16.90
16.9 – 17.320
17.32 – 17.750
17.75 – 18.170
18.17 – 18.60
18.6 – 19.02795
19.02 – 19.450
19.45 – 19.880
19.88 – 20.30
20.3 – 20.730
20.73 – 21.150
21.15 – 21.570
21.57 – 2232

TE Group Measure Count categorical

rows5,421
null0 (0.0%)
unique2
top_value12
top_rate0.841
cardinality2
entropy0.632
entropy_ratio0.632
Show data table
Top values for TE Group Measure Count (2 unique shown, of 2 total).
valuecountshare
12455884.1%
Not Available86315.9%
Top values (rank 1–20)
  1. 12 — 4,558
  2. Not Available — 863

Count of Facility TE Measures categorical

rows5,421
null0 (0.0%)
unique13
top_valueNot Available
top_rate0.171
cardinality13
entropy3.458
entropy_ratio0.934
Show data table
Top values for Count of Facility TE Measures (13 unique shown, of 13 total).
valuecountshare
Not Available92817.1%
1075914.0%
1172413.4%
954310.0%
83917.2%
53516.5%
123476.4%
63376.2%
72845.2%
42725.0%
32695.0%
21633.0%
1531.0%
Top values (rank 1–20)
  1. Not Available — 928
  2. 10 — 759
  3. 11 — 724
  4. 9 — 543
  5. 8 — 391
  6. 5 — 351
  7. 12 — 347
  8. 6 — 337
  9. 7 — 284
  10. 4 — 272
  11. 3 — 269
  12. 2 — 163
  13. 1 — 53

TE Group Footnote numeric

82.9% null skew=-2.43 14.3% rows beyond 1.5 IQR
rows5,421
null4,493 (82.9%)
unique3
min5.000
max22.000
mean17.580
median19.000
std4.432
q119.000
q319.000
iqr0.000
skew-2.430
kurtosis4.120
n_outliers133
outlier_rate0.143
zero_rate0.000
Show data table
Histogram bins for TE Group Footnote (median: 19.0).
bincount
5 – 5.567101
5.567 – 6.1330
6.133 – 6.70
6.7 – 7.2670
7.267 – 7.8330
7.833 – 8.40
8.4 – 8.9670
8.967 – 9.5330
9.533 – 10.10
10.1 – 10.670
10.67 – 11.230
11.23 – 11.80
11.8 – 12.370
12.37 – 12.930
12.93 – 13.50
13.5 – 14.070
14.07 – 14.630
14.63 – 15.20
15.2 – 15.770
15.77 – 16.330
16.33 – 16.90
16.9 – 17.470
17.47 – 18.030
18.03 – 18.60
18.6 – 19.17795
19.17 – 19.730
19.73 – 20.30
20.3 – 20.870
20.87 – 21.430
21.43 – 2232