saturn

/home/coolhand/html/datavis/data_trove/cache/wild/nyc_311_sample.json 1,000 rows sample n=1,000 seed 42 2026-06-21T23:19:33+00:00

Overview

Source/home/coolhand/html/datavis/data_trove/cache/wild/nyc_311_sample.json
Total rows1,000
Profiled sample1,000
Columns47
Generated2026-06-21T23:19:33+00:00
Show data table
Per-column null rate across the corpus.
columnkindnull %
unique_keycategorical0.0%
created_datecategorical0.0%
agencycategorical0.0%
agency_namecategorical0.0%
complaint_typecategorical0.0%
descriptorcategorical0.0%
location_typecategorical1.4%
incident_zipcategorical0.3%
incident_addresscategorical0.5%
street_namecategorical0.5%
cross_street_1categorical8.0%
cross_street_2categorical7.9%
intersection_street_1categorical8.5%
intersection_street_2categorical8.4%
address_typecategorical0.2%
citycategorical2.1%
landmarkcategorical10.5%
statuscategorical0.0%
community_boardcategorical0.0%
council_districtcategorical0.9%
police_precinctcategorical0.0%
bblcategorical5.5%
boroughcategorical0.0%
x_coordinate_state_planecategorical0.7%
y_coordinate_state_planecategorical0.7%
open_data_channel_typecategorical0.0%
park_facility_namecategorical0.0%
park_boroughcategorical0.0%
latitudecategorical0.7%
longitudecategorical0.7%
locationunknown0.0%
:@computed_region_f5dn_yrercategorical0.7%
:@computed_region_yeji_bk3qcategorical0.7%
:@computed_region_sbqj_enihcategorical0.7%
:@computed_region_92fq_4b7qcategorical0.7%
descriptor_2categorical88.2%
resolution_descriptioncategorical30.7%
resolution_action_updated_datecategorical30.6%
closed_datecategorical39.0%
taxi_pick_up_locationcategorical99.4%
vehicle_typecategorical96.5%
facility_typecategorical99.0%
taxi_company_boroughcategorical99.9%
bridge_highway_namecategorical99.7%
bridge_highway_directioncategorical99.7%
road_rampcategorical99.9%
bridge_highway_segmentcategorical99.7%

Insights opt-in

Model-generated narrative. These are opinions, not facts — the stats below are what saturn measured. Generated by: anthropic:default.

Dataset high anthropic:default

This dataset is a sample of 1,000 NYC 311 service requests, capturing complaints logged across the five boroughs with details on complaint type, location, agency, and resolution status. The dominant signal is complaint type: 'Noise - Residential' alone accounts for 39.3% of records, followed by 'Illegal Parking' (19.7%) and 'Noise - Commercial' (14.8%), pointing to a dataset heavily skewed toward NYPD-handled quality-of-life complaints (NYPD handles 88% of cases). A second area worth examining is resolution status — 61% of complaints are closed, 30.5% are still in progress, and 8.5% remain open, which raises questions about agency workload and response time. Many specialty columns (road_ramp, taxi_company_borough, bridge_highway fields) are nearly entirely null (99%+), indicating they apply only to rare complaint subtypes and can largely be ignored.

resolution_action_updated_date high anthropic:default

This column is a timestamp recording when a resolution action was last updated, stored as a categorical string in ISO 8601 format. The 30.6% null rate is a significant concern, indicating roughly one-third of records have no update date logged. Strikingly, one value — '2026-01-17T00:00:00.000' — accounts for 10.7% of all non-null records (74 occurrences) with a midnight-exactly timestamp, suggesting a bulk update or default-date assignment rather than genuine event timestamps. All remaining top values appear only twice, confirming a severe long-tail distribution (entropy ratio 0.94) consistent with mostly unique timestamps.

closed_date high anthropic:default

This column is a ticket or record closure timestamp, stored as a string rather than a parsed datetime type, with second-level precision. Two signals demand attention: 39% of rows are null, indicating a large share of records that have not yet been closed (open items); and with 585 unique values across 1,000 rows and an entropy ratio of 0.998, timestamps are nearly all distinct, which is expected for event times but confirms the column carries no categorical signal. All top values cluster on 2026-01-18, suggesting the snapshot or batch was captured on that single date.

descriptor_2 high anthropic:default

This column is a secondary complaint descriptor, likely a sub-category or detail field attached to a service request or complaint record (consistent with NYC 311-style data). It is almost entirely empty — null_rate is 0.882, meaning only 118 of 1,000 rows carry a value. Among the 43 unique non-null values, 'NO HEAT' dominates at 27.97% of non-null entries (33 occurrences), but the spread across housing, noise, sanitation, and transportation categories (e.g., 'Cannabis Smoking or Vaping', 'Unsafe Driving - Non-Passenger') signals this field is populated inconsistently across complaint types, not a uniform taxonomy. The high entropy_ratio of 0.807 confirms the long-tail alert: values are broadly dispersed despite the sparse fill rate.

park_facility_name high anthropic:default

This column captures the named park facility associated with each record, but it is almost entirely uninformative: 999 of 1000 rows (99.9%) carry the placeholder value 'Unspecified', with only a single record attributed to Flushing Meadows Corona Park. The near-zero entropy (0.011) confirms the column is maximally imbalanced and conveys virtually no discriminative signal. This is likely a poorly populated administrative field rather than a reliable feature.

address_type high anthropic:default

This column classifies the type of geographic address entry, with four categories: ADDRESS, INTERSECTION, BLOCKFACE, and PLACE. It is severely imbalanced — 'ADDRESS' dominates at 97.2% of valid records (970/1000), while the remaining three types collectively account for only 28 records. The entropy ratio of 0.108 confirms near-minimal informational diversity, meaning this field will contribute little discriminative power in most models without special handling.

resolution_description high anthropic:default

This column contains standardized resolution outcome descriptions from NYC 311 service requests, drawn from a fixed vocabulary of only 16 distinct boilerplate phrases. Despite being a text column, it behaves as a low-cardinality categorical: the top value (NYPD 'no criminal violation, condition corrected') accounts for 35.4% of non-null rows. A 30.7% null rate is flagged as an alert, likely reflecting complaints that have not yet been resolved or closed.

created_date high anthropic:default

This column is a creation timestamp, stored as a categorical string in ISO-8601 millisecond format (e.g., '2026-01-17T23:49:56.000'). With 939 unique values out of 1000 rows and an entropy ratio of 0.995, it behaves almost like a unique identifier. The long-tail alert and the fact that the most frequent value appears only 9 times (0.9% of rows) suggest occasional duplicate timestamps — likely batch inserts or rapid successive record creation within the same second.

unique_key high anthropic:default

This column is a unique row identifier, likely a primary key or transaction/record ID — every one of the 1000 rows has a distinct value, giving it perfect cardinality and a maximum entropy ratio of 1.0. Values appear to be numeric strings in a narrow range (~67519046–67525266), suggesting sequential or near-sequential ID assignment. There is nothing analytically surprising here beyond the expected long-tail alert, which is a trivial consequence of full uniqueness. The null rate is 0.0.

incident_address high anthropic:default

This column contains free-text street addresses of incident locations, likely from a New York City incident or complaints dataset given recognizable street names (Lenox Avenue, Avenue of the Americas, Bruckner Boulevard). With 776 unique values across 1,000 rows and an entropy ratio of 0.97, the distribution is highly dispersed — a classic long-tail pattern. Notably, '126 WEST 13 STREET' appears 31 times (3.1% of rows), a disproportionate spike that may indicate a shelter, institution, or high-incident venue worth investigating. Inconsistent spacing in values like '60 EAST 93 STREET' suggests formatting irregularities that will need normalization.

street_name high anthropic:default

This column contains street names, almost certainly from a New York City dataset given entries like 'WEST 13 STREET', 'LENOX AVENUE', 'BRUCKNER BOULEVARD', and 'JAMAICA AVENUE'. With 569 unique values across 1,000 rows and an entropy ratio of 0.955, the distribution is highly spread — the top value 'WEST 13 STREET' appears only 31 times (3.1% of rows), confirming the long-tail alert. The near-zero null rate (0.5%) is clean, but the high cardinality and long tail mean most street names are rare, which limits direct one-hot encoding utility.

latitude high anthropic:default

This column contains geographic latitude coordinates stored as strings, with all top values clustering tightly around 40.6–40.8°N — consistent with New York City's latitude range. Despite being numeric in nature, it was ingested as categorical, yielding 770 unique values across 1,000 rows (entropy ratio 0.97), which is near-unique. The long-tail alert and the top value ('40.73706433046593') appearing 31 times (3.1% of rows) suggests either a default/fallback coordinate or a high-traffic location being logged repeatedly.

longitude high anthropic:default

This column contains geographic longitude values, stored as strings (hence the categorical classification), representing locations clustered tightly around -73.8 to -74.0 — consistent with New York City. Despite 1,000 rows, there are 770 unique values, yet the top value '-73.99830041620608' appears 31 times (3.1% of rows), which is surprisingly high given the near-continuous nature of coordinate data and flags a long-tail concentration. Entropy ratio of 0.97 confirms very high diversity overall, but the repeated exact coordinate values suggest either data binning, snapping to a fixed point, or duplicated records at specific locations.

x_coordinate_state_plane high anthropic:default

This column contains X-coordinates in a State Plane coordinate system, stored as categorical strings rather than numerics — values like '984721' and '1004501' are typical State Plane Easting values in feet. With 763 unique values out of 1000 rows (entropy ratio 0.97) and a long-tail alert, the distribution is nearly unique per record, which is expected for spatial point coordinates. The top value '984721' appearing 31 times (3.1% of rows) is surprisingly frequent for a coordinate and may indicate a default, imputed, or snapped location worth investigating.

y_coordinate_state_plane high anthropic:default

This column represents Y-coordinates in a State Plane coordinate system, likely a geographic reference for spatial data (e.g., NYC or similar municipal dataset). Despite being numeric in nature, it is stored as a categorical type, which is unexpected and likely a data pipeline issue. With 768 unique values out of 1000 rows (entropy ratio 0.97) and a long-tail alert, the distribution is highly dispersed, though the top value '207809' appears 31 times — a modest but notable cluster suggesting a frequently referenced location. The near-unique cardinality makes this unsuitable for direct use as a categorical feature.

bbl high anthropic:default

This column contains New York City Borough-Block-Lot (BBL) codes, a standard 10-digit property identifier encoding borough (leading digit 1–5), block, and lot numbers. With 719 unique values across 1,000 rows and an entropy ratio of 0.97, it is near-unique, but the top value '1006080026' appears 31 times (3.3% of non-null rows), indicating repeated records tied to a single property — flagged as a long tail. The 5.5% null rate and clustering of repeats suggest this may be a foreign key referencing a property registry rather than a row-level unique identifier.

cross_street_2 high anthropic:default

This column contains the secondary cross-street name associated with a location record, likely from a NYC incident or address dataset. With 504 unique values across 1,000 rows and an entropy ratio of 0.948, the distribution is nearly flat — a strong long-tail signal where most street names appear very rarely. The top value '7 AVENUE' appears only 36 times (3.9% of non-null rows), and 'DEAD END' appearing 10 times is a notable data-quality flag indicating unresolved or terminus locations.

cross_street_1 high anthropic:default

This column captures the first cross street in a NYC street-address intersection, most likely from a traffic incident, 311, or similar geospatial events dataset. With 511 unique values across 1,000 rows and an entropy ratio of 0.953, the distribution is nearly flat — a strong long-tail signal — meaning the vast majority of street names appear only once or twice. The top value 'AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS' appears just 35 times (3.8% of rows), and the 8% null rate suggests some records lack cross-street data entirely.

intersection_street_2 high anthropic:default

This column captures the secondary (cross) street name at an intersection, likely from a New York City incident or traffic dataset. With 499 unique values across 1,000 rows and an entropy ratio of 0.948, the distribution is nearly flat — a strong long-tail pattern where '7 AVENUE' is the modal value at only 3.9% frequency. The presence of 'DEAD END' (10 occurrences) as a top value is notable, indicating it is used as a literal street descriptor rather than a true street name, which may require cleaning. An 8.4% null rate suggests some incidents occurred at non-intersection locations (e.g., mid-block).

intersection_street_1 high anthropic:default

This column captures the name of the first cross-street at an intersection, consistent with NYC street-incident or infrastructure data. With 506 unique values across 1,000 rows (entropy ratio 0.95), the distribution is nearly flat — a long-tail alert confirms that the vast majority of street names appear only once or twice, while even the top value ('AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS') accounts for just 3.8% of non-null records. An 8.5% null rate suggests intersections are not always fully recorded, which may indicate missing location data rather than true absence of a street.

landmark high anthropic:default

This column contains street or landmark names, likely representing the nearest notable street or geographic reference point for each record in a New York City–area dataset. With 515 unique values across 1,000 rows (51.5% uniqueness) and a 10.5% null rate, coverage is incomplete. The distribution is heavily long-tailed: the top value 'WEST 13 STREET' appears only 31 times (3.46%), and the entropy ratio of 0.955 indicates near-maximum disorder, meaning most landmark names are rare or unique — making this column unsuitable as a reliable grouping key without significant consolidation.

location low anthropic:default

This column is named 'location' and contains 1,000 non-null values with a null rate of 0.0, but the profiler skipped it entirely, yielding no stats, no uniqueness count, and no type inference. Without distribution, cardinality, or sample values, it is impossible to determine whether this is a structured geographic field (e.g., city, coordinates, country code) or free-text. The 'skipped' alert is the dominant signal and warrants direct inspection of raw values before any downstream use.

agency high anthropic:default

This column identifies the New York City municipal agency associated with each record, with 11 distinct agency codes and no nulls across 1,000 rows. The distribution is severely skewed: NYPD alone accounts for 88% of all records (880 of 1,000), while the remaining 10 agencies collectively cover only 120 rows — several (DHS, OOS, DCWP, DPR) appear just twice each. The low entropy ratio of 0.223 confirms this near-monolithic concentration, which could bias any agency-level analysis or model trained on this sample.

agency_name high anthropic:default

This column identifies the New York City municipal agency responsible for each record, with 11 distinct agencies across 1,000 rows and no nulls. It is severely dominated by the New York City Police Department, which accounts for 88% of all records (880 of 1,000), producing a very low entropy ratio of 0.223. The remaining 10 agencies collectively cover only 120 records, with several (e.g., Department of Homeless Services, Office of the Sheriff) appearing just twice. This extreme class imbalance will distort any agency-level aggregation or model that uses this column as a feature.

borough high anthropic:default

This column represents the five New York City boroughs, functioning as a geographic label with complete coverage (null_rate 0.0) across all 1,000 rows. Four boroughs — Queens (274), Manhattan (258), Brooklyn (254), and Bronx (203) — are distributed with reasonable balance, but Staten Island is strikingly underrepresented at just 11 occurrences (~1.1%), compared to 20% expected under uniform distribution. The high entropy_ratio of 0.886 reflects the near-even spread among the four dominant boroughs, masking Staten Island's severe underrepresentation.

community_board high anthropic:default

This column represents NYC Community Board designations, combining a numeric district ID with a borough name (e.g., '02 MANHATTAN'). With 65 unique values across 1,000 rows and zero nulls, coverage is complete. The distribution is notably flat — entropy ratio of 0.93 indicates near-uniform spread, with the most frequent value ('02 MANHATTAN') appearing only 5.6% of the time, suggesting no single board dominates the dataset. Manhattan and Queens boards appear disproportionately among the top 10, which may reflect a geographic sampling bias worth investigating.

complaint_type high anthropic:default

This column contains the categorized type of civic complaint (likely NYC 311 service requests), with 45 distinct complaint categories across 1,000 records and zero nulls. The distribution is heavily skewed: 'Noise - Residential' alone accounts for 39.3% of all records, and the top three noise-related categories together represent roughly 60% of the dataset. The entropy ratio of 0.53 indicates moderate concentration — far from uniform — with a long tail of rare complaint types below the top 10.

descriptor high anthropic:default

This column contains descriptive sub-type labels for service requests or complaints — likely from a system such as NYC 311 — further specifying the nature of each complaint beyond a top-level category. 'Loud Music/Party' dominates with 42.7% of all 1,000 records, creating notable class imbalance; the top two values alone account for 54.1% of rows. With 71 unique values, entropy ratio of 0.576, and zero nulls, the column is moderately concentrated but still covers a meaningful range of complaint types including noise, parking, and building issues.

open_data_channel_type high anthropic:default

This column captures the channel through which a report or request was submitted, with four distinct values: ONLINE, MOBILE, PHONE, and UNKNOWN. ONLINE dominates at 46.6% of records, followed by MOBILE (28.8%) and PHONE (23.6%), leaving only 10 records (1%) tagged as UNKNOWN. The near-uniform distribution across the three known channels is notable, and the UNKNOWN category — while small — may warrant imputation or flagging depending on downstream use.

park_borough high anthropic:default

This column encodes the five NYC borough names associated with park locations, making it a low-cardinality geographic label with zero nulls across 1,000 rows. Four boroughs (Queens, Manhattan, Brooklyn, Bronx) are nearly evenly distributed (203–274 records each), but Staten Island is severely underrepresented at just 11 occurrences (1.1%), which would surprise an analyst expecting proportional borough coverage. Entropy ratio of 0.886 reflects the near-uniform spread across four classes, masking the sharp imbalance on the fifth.

police_precinct high anthropic:default

This column represents the police precinct assignment for each record, with 76 distinct precinct labels across 1,000 rows and zero nulls. The distribution is remarkably flat: the most common value, 'Precinct 6', appears only 50 times (5% of rows), and entropy ratio is 0.936 — nearly as uniform as a perfectly even distribution across all 76 precincts. No dominant precinct stands out, suggesting either a geographically broad dataset or deliberate sampling across jurisdictions.

status high anthropic:default

This column is a workflow/lifecycle status field with exactly 3 states: Closed, In Progress, and Open. 'Closed' dominates at 61% (610/1000), while 'Open' is surprisingly rare at only 8.5% (85/1000), suggesting the dataset skews heavily toward resolved records — possibly a historical or archived snapshot rather than a live operational view. No nulls and perfect coverage across all 1000 rows.

incident_zip high anthropic:default

This column contains US ZIP codes associated with incidents, all values appearing to be New York City ZIP codes (10xxx and 11xxx series, consistent with Manhattan, Queens, and the Bronx). With 146 unique values across 1,000 rows and a high entropy ratio of 0.931, the distribution is remarkably spread — the most frequent ZIP '10011' appears only 42 times (4.2%), indicating incidents are distributed broadly across many neighbourhoods rather than concentrated in a few. Null rate is negligible at 0.3%.

:@computed_region_92fq_4b7q high anthropic:default

This column is a Socrata-generated computed region identifier, typically encoding a geographic zone or district (e.g., census tract, neighbourhood, or administrative boundary) as an opaque integer-like label. With 51 unique values across 1,000 rows and an entropy ratio of 0.948, the distribution is near-uniform — no single region dominates heavily, though region '10' leads with 6.4% of records (64 occurrences). The null rate of 0.7% is negligible, suggesting reliable spatial assignment.

:@computed_region_f5dn_yrer high anthropic:default

This column is a Socrata-generated computed region identifier, assigning each row to one of 62 geographic zones (e.g., neighborhood, district, or census tract polygons). With an entropy ratio of 0.939 and 62 unique integer-like codes across 1,000 rows, values are distributed fairly evenly — the most frequent region ('57') accounts for only 5.6% of rows, suggesting no strong spatial concentration. The null rate is negligible at 0.7%. The numeric-looking codes are categorical labels, not ordinal or continuous values.

:@computed_region_sbqj_enih high anthropic:default

This column is a Socrata computed region identifier, automatically generated by the platform to assign rows to pre-defined geographic boundary zones (e.g., neighbourhoods, council districts, or census tracts). With 75 distinct integer-like codes across 1,000 rows and an entropy ratio of 0.94, the distribution is remarkably flat — no single zone dominates, with even the top value '3' appearing in only 5% of rows. The near-uniform spread across 75 regions and very low null rate (0.7%) suggest broad geographic coverage with no strong spatial concentration.

:@computed_region_yeji_bk3q high anthropic:default

This column is a Socrata-generated computed region identifier (geo-zone lookup key), indicated by the ':@computed_region_' prefix — it maps each row to one of 5 predefined geographic regions. Values are nearly uniformly distributed across zones 2–4 (~254–269 rows each), but zone '1' is a stark outlier with only 11 occurrences (~1.1% of rows), which may signal a very small or edge-case geographic area. Null rate is negligible at 0.7%.

council_district high anthropic:default

This column represents a council district code — a zero-padded numeric string identifier (e.g., '03', '32') used to assign records to geographic administrative units. With 51 distinct values across 1,000 rows and an entropy ratio of 0.954, the distribution is remarkably flat and near-uniform, meaning no single district dominates heavily; the most frequent value '03' appears only 56 times (5.65% of rows). This near-maximum entropy is unusual for a district field and suggests either broad geographic coverage or deliberate sampling across all districts. Null rate is negligible at 0.9%.

location_type high anthropic:default

This column encodes the type of location where an incident or event occurred, with 20 distinct values across 1,000 rows. The dominant category is 'Residential Building/House' at 40.2% (396 occurrences), followed by 'Street/Sidewalk' at 324. A significant data quality issue is immediately apparent: the same real-world concept appears under multiple inconsistent labels — 'Residential Building/House' (396), 'RESIDENTIAL BUILDING' (74), and 'Residential Building' (7) are clearly duplicates, as are 'Street/Sidewalk' (324), 'Street' (8), and 'Sidewalk' (5) — meaning true cardinality is substantially lower than 20 and category frequencies are understated.

city high anthropic:default

This column contains NYC neighborhood and borough city names, almost certainly a mailing-address city field from a dataset heavily concentrated in New York City. The top three values alone — BROOKLYN (250), NEW YORK (249), and BRONX (198) — account for roughly 70% of the 1,000 rows, while the remaining 33 values (e.g., WOODHAVEN, JAMAICA, RIDGEWOOD) are clearly Queens and Brooklyn sub-neighborhoods used as postal city names. The distribution is notably skewed (top_rate 0.255) but the entropy_ratio of 0.635 across 36 unique values suggests moderate spread beyond the top cluster; the 2.1% null rate is minor.

unique_key categorical

1000 singleton categories
rows1,000
null0 (0.0%)
unique1,000
top_value67519092
top_rate1.00e-03
cardinality1,000
entropy9.966
entropy_ratio1.000
Show data table
Top values for unique_key (20 unique shown, of 1000 total).
valuecountshare
6751909210.1%
6752526610.1%
6752523910.1%
6752109410.1%
6751904610.1%
6751906010.1%
6752421810.1%
6752422110.1%
6752025310.1%
6751907810.1%
6752215710.1%
6752109810.1%
6752423410.1%
6752318310.1%
6751909110.1%
6752423110.1%
6752010410.1%
6752109510.1%
6752212710.1%
6752318610.1%
Top values (rank 1–20)
  1. 67519092 — 1
  2. 67525266 — 1
  3. 67525239 — 1
  4. 67521094 — 1
  5. 67519046 — 1
  6. 67519060 — 1
  7. 67524218 — 1
  8. 67524221 — 1
  9. 67520253 — 1
  10. 67519078 — 1
  11. 67522157 — 1
  12. 67521098 — 1
  13. 67524234 — 1
  14. 67523183 — 1
  15. 67519091 — 1
  16. 67524231 — 1
  17. 67520104 — 1
  18. 67521095 — 1
  19. 67522127 — 1
  20. 67523186 — 1

created_date categorical

889 singleton categories
rows1,000
null0 (0.0%)
unique939
top_value2026-01-17T23:49:56.000
top_rate9.00e-03
cardinality939
entropy9.828
entropy_ratio0.995
Show data table
Top values for created_date (20 unique shown, of 939 total).
valuecountshare
2026-01-17T23:49:56.00090.9%
2026-01-17T23:43:55.00040.4%
2026-01-18T01:11:10.00030.3%
2026-01-17T23:04:06.00030.3%
2026-01-18T01:25:57.00020.2%
2026-01-18T01:25:16.00020.2%
2026-01-18T01:18:23.00020.2%
2026-01-18T01:12:27.00020.2%
2026-01-18T01:08:57.00020.2%
2026-01-18T01:07:55.00020.2%
2026-01-18T01:04:36.00020.2%
2026-01-18T01:02:54.00020.2%
2026-01-18T00:53:20.00020.2%
2026-01-18T00:47:20.00020.2%
2026-01-18T00:38:56.00020.2%
2026-01-18T00:35:43.00020.2%
2026-01-18T00:35:09.00020.2%
2026-01-18T00:31:54.00020.2%
2026-01-18T00:28:06.00020.2%
2026-01-18T00:26:25.00020.2%
Top values (rank 1–20)
  1. 2026-01-17T23:49:56.000 — 9
  2. 2026-01-17T23:43:55.000 — 4
  3. 2026-01-18T01:11:10.000 — 3
  4. 2026-01-17T23:04:06.000 — 3
  5. 2026-01-18T01:25:57.000 — 2
  6. 2026-01-18T01:25:16.000 — 2
  7. 2026-01-18T01:18:23.000 — 2
  8. 2026-01-18T01:12:27.000 — 2
  9. 2026-01-18T01:08:57.000 — 2
  10. 2026-01-18T01:07:55.000 — 2
  11. 2026-01-18T01:04:36.000 — 2
  12. 2026-01-18T01:02:54.000 — 2
  13. 2026-01-18T00:53:20.000 — 2
  14. 2026-01-18T00:47:20.000 — 2
  15. 2026-01-18T00:38:56.000 — 2
  16. 2026-01-18T00:35:43.000 — 2
  17. 2026-01-18T00:35:09.000 — 2
  18. 2026-01-18T00:31:54.000 — 2
  19. 2026-01-18T00:28:06.000 — 2
  20. 2026-01-18T00:26:25.000 — 2

agency categorical

rows1,000
null0 (0.0%)
unique11
top_valueNYPD
top_rate0.880
cardinality11
entropy0.772
entropy_ratio0.223
Show data table
Top values for agency (11 unique shown, of 11 total).
valuecountshare
NYPD88088.0%
HPD747.4%
DOHMH131.3%
DOT111.1%
TLC60.6%
DSNY60.6%
DHS20.2%
OOS20.2%
DCWP20.2%
DPR20.2%
DEP20.2%
Top values (rank 1–20)
  1. NYPD — 880
  2. HPD — 74
  3. DOHMH — 13
  4. DOT — 11
  5. TLC — 6
  6. DSNY — 6
  7. DHS — 2
  8. OOS — 2
  9. DCWP — 2
  10. DPR — 2
  11. DEP — 2

agency_name categorical

rows1,000
null0 (0.0%)
unique11
top_valueNew York City Police Department
top_rate0.880
cardinality11
entropy0.772
entropy_ratio0.223
Show data table
Top values for agency_name (11 unique shown, of 11 total).
valuecountshare
New York City Police Department88088.0%
Department of Housing Preservation and Development747.4%
Department of Health and Mental Hygiene131.3%
Department of Transportation111.1%
Taxi and Limousine Commission60.6%
Department of Sanitation60.6%
Department of Homeless Services20.2%
Office of the Sheriff20.2%
Department of Consumer and Worker Protection20.2%
Department of Parks and Recreation20.2%
Department of Environmental Protection20.2%
Top values (rank 1–20)
  1. New York City Police Department — 880
  2. Department of Housing Preservation and Development — 74
  3. Department of Health and Mental Hygiene — 13
  4. Department of Transportation — 11
  5. Taxi and Limousine Commission — 6
  6. Department of Sanitation — 6
  7. Department of Homeless Services — 2
  8. Office of the Sheriff — 2
  9. Department of Consumer and Worker Protection — 2
  10. Department of Parks and Recreation — 2
  11. Department of Environmental Protection — 2

complaint_type categorical

rows1,000
null0 (0.0%)
unique45
top_valueNoise - Residential
top_rate0.393
cardinality45
entropy2.935
entropy_ratio0.534
Show data table
Top values for complaint_type (20 unique shown, of 45 total).
valuecountshare
Noise - Residential39339.3%
Illegal Parking19719.7%
Noise - Commercial14814.8%
Blocked Driveway555.5%
HEAT/HOT WATER494.9%
Noise - Street/Sidewalk444.4%
Noise - Vehicle171.7%
UNSANITARY CONDITION121.2%
Street Condition70.7%
Non-Emergency Police Matter70.7%
Smoking or Vaping50.5%
Abandoned Vehicle50.5%
Animal-Abuse50.5%
Rodent40.4%
Encampment40.4%
Taxi Complaint30.3%
Dirty Condition30.3%
PAINT/PLASTER30.3%
GENERAL30.3%
Drinking20.2%
Top values (rank 1–20)
  1. Noise - Residential — 393
  2. Illegal Parking — 197
  3. Noise - Commercial — 148
  4. Blocked Driveway — 55
  5. HEAT/HOT WATER — 49
  6. Noise - Street/Sidewalk — 44
  7. Noise - Vehicle — 17
  8. UNSANITARY CONDITION — 12
  9. Street Condition — 7
  10. Non-Emergency Police Matter — 7
  11. Smoking or Vaping — 5
  12. Abandoned Vehicle — 5
  13. Animal-Abuse — 5
  14. Rodent — 4
  15. Encampment — 4
  16. Taxi Complaint — 3
  17. Dirty Condition — 3
  18. PAINT/PLASTER — 3
  19. GENERAL — 3
  20. Drinking — 2

descriptor categorical

rows1,000
null0 (0.0%)
unique71
top_valueLoud Music/Party
top_rate0.427
cardinality71
entropy3.540
entropy_ratio0.576
Show data table
Top values for descriptor (20 unique shown, of 71 total).
valuecountshare
Loud Music/Party42742.7%
Banging/Pounding11411.4%
Blocked Hydrant797.9%
No Access454.5%
Posted Parking Sign Violation424.2%
Loud Talking363.6%
ENTIRE BUILDING353.5%
Blocked Sidewalk212.1%
Commercial Overnight Parking202.0%
APARTMENT ONLY141.4%
Car/Truck Music131.3%
Double Parked Blocking Traffic131.3%
Loud Television101.0%
Partial Access101.0%
PESTS101.0%
Blocked Crosswalk90.9%
Pothole60.6%
Allowed in Smoke Free Area50.5%
With License Plate50.5%
No Shelter50.5%
Top values (rank 1–20)
  1. Loud Music/Party — 427
  2. Banging/Pounding — 114
  3. Blocked Hydrant — 79
  4. No Access — 45
  5. Posted Parking Sign Violation — 42
  6. Loud Talking — 36
  7. ENTIRE BUILDING — 35
  8. Blocked Sidewalk — 21
  9. Commercial Overnight Parking — 20
  10. APARTMENT ONLY — 14
  11. Car/Truck Music — 13
  12. Double Parked Blocking Traffic — 13
  13. Loud Television — 10
  14. Partial Access — 10
  15. PESTS — 10
  16. Blocked Crosswalk — 9
  17. Pothole — 6
  18. Allowed in Smoke Free Area — 5
  19. With License Plate — 5
  20. No Shelter — 5

location_type categorical

rows1,000
null14 (1.4%)
unique20
top_valueResidential Building/House
top_rate0.402
cardinality20
entropy2.237
entropy_ratio0.518
Show data table
Top values for location_type (20 unique shown, of 20 total).
valuecountshare
Residential Building/House39639.6%
Street/Sidewalk32432.4%
Club/Bar/Restaurant919.1%
RESIDENTIAL BUILDING747.4%
Store/Commercial606.0%
Street80.8%
Residential Building70.7%
Sidewalk50.5%
3+ Family Apartment Building30.3%
House and Store30.3%
3+ Family Apt. Building20.2%
Business20.2%
Subway20.2%
Other20.2%
Park/Playground20.2%
1-2 Family Mixed Use Building10.1%
Restaurant/Bar/Deli/Bakery10.1%
Bridge10.1%
Taxi10.1%
1-2 Family Dwelling10.1%
Top values (rank 1–20)
  1. Residential Building/House — 396
  2. Street/Sidewalk — 324
  3. Club/Bar/Restaurant — 91
  4. RESIDENTIAL BUILDING — 74
  5. Store/Commercial — 60
  6. Street — 8
  7. Residential Building — 7
  8. Sidewalk — 5
  9. 3+ Family Apartment Building — 3
  10. House and Store — 3
  11. 3+ Family Apt. Building — 2
  12. Business — 2
  13. Subway — 2
  14. Other — 2
  15. Park/Playground — 2
  16. 1-2 Family Mixed Use Building — 1
  17. Restaurant/Bar/Deli/Bakery — 1
  18. Bridge — 1
  19. Taxi — 1
  20. 1-2 Family Dwelling — 1

incident_zip categorical

rows1,000
null3 (0.3%)
unique146
top_value10011
top_rate0.042
cardinality146
entropy6.696
entropy_ratio0.931
Show data table
Top values for incident_zip (20 unique shown, of 146 total).
valuecountshare
10011424.2%
11421353.5%
11385292.9%
10463222.2%
10031222.2%
11368212.1%
10456202.0%
10009191.9%
10462171.7%
10002161.6%
11206151.5%
11212151.5%
11226141.4%
11375141.4%
10012141.4%
11373141.4%
10461131.3%
10452121.2%
10468121.2%
10034121.2%
Top values (rank 1–20)
  1. 10011 — 42
  2. 11421 — 35
  3. 11385 — 29
  4. 10463 — 22
  5. 10031 — 22
  6. 11368 — 21
  7. 10456 — 20
  8. 10009 — 19
  9. 10462 — 17
  10. 10002 — 16
  11. 11206 — 15
  12. 11212 — 15
  13. 11226 — 14
  14. 11375 — 14
  15. 10012 — 14
  16. 11373 — 14
  17. 10461 — 13
  18. 10452 — 12
  19. 10468 — 12
  20. 10034 — 12

incident_address categorical

664 singleton categories
rows1,000
null5 (0.5%)
unique776
top_value126 WEST 13 STREET
top_rate0.031
cardinality776
entropy9.321
entropy_ratio0.971
Show data table
Top values for incident_address (20 unique shown, of 776 total).
valuecountshare
126 WEST 13 STREET313.1%
60 EAST 93 STREET131.3%
71 LENOX AVENUE80.8%
105 MACDOUGAL STREET80.8%
1465 WASHINGTON AVENUE80.8%
2918 BRUCKNER BOULEVARD70.7%
190 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS50.5%
235 COURT STREET50.5%
74-03 85 DRIVE50.5%
85 TOMPKINS AVENUE50.5%
1365 5 AVENUE40.4%
112-17 NORTHERN BOULEVARD40.4%
182 NAGLE AVENUE40.4%
108-26 159 STREET40.4%
402 ONDERDONK AVENUE40.4%
465 SENECA AVENUE30.3%
2140 MATTHEWS AVENUE30.3%
28-10 JACKSON AVENUE30.3%
62-11 108 STREET30.3%
499 MYRTLE AVENUE30.3%
Top values (rank 1–20)
  1. 126 WEST 13 STREET — 31
  2. 60 EAST 93 STREET — 13
  3. 71 LENOX AVENUE — 8
  4. 105 MACDOUGAL STREET — 8
  5. 1465 WASHINGTON AVENUE — 8
  6. 2918 BRUCKNER BOULEVARD — 7
  7. 190 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS — 5
  8. 235 COURT STREET — 5
  9. 74-03 85 DRIVE — 5
  10. 85 TOMPKINS AVENUE — 5
  11. 1365 5 AVENUE — 4
  12. 112-17 NORTHERN BOULEVARD — 4
  13. 182 NAGLE AVENUE — 4
  14. 108-26 159 STREET — 4
  15. 402 ONDERDONK AVENUE — 4
  16. 465 SENECA AVENUE — 3
  17. 2140 MATTHEWS AVENUE — 3
  18. 28-10 JACKSON AVENUE — 3
  19. 62-11 108 STREET — 3
  20. 499 MYRTLE AVENUE — 3

street_name categorical

371 singleton categories
rows1,000
null5 (0.5%)
unique569
top_valueWEST 13 STREET
top_rate0.031
cardinality569
entropy8.742
entropy_ratio0.955
Show data table
Top values for street_name (20 unique shown, of 569 total).
valuecountshare
WEST 13 STREET313.1%
EAST 93 STREET131.3%
JAMAICA AVENUE111.1%
WASHINGTON AVENUE111.1%
LENOX AVENUE101.0%
MACDOUGAL STREET101.0%
BROADWAY90.9%
BRUCKNER BOULEVARD80.8%
BROOKLYN AVENUE70.7%
NORTHERN BOULEVARD70.7%
76 STREET70.7%
COURT STREET60.6%
EAST 74 STREET60.6%
GRAND STREET50.5%
BUSHWICK AVENUE50.5%
EAST 3 STREET50.5%
SENECA AVENUE50.5%
111 AVENUE50.5%
AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS50.5%
AMSTERDAM AVENUE50.5%
Top values (rank 1–20)
  1. WEST 13 STREET — 31
  2. EAST 93 STREET — 13
  3. JAMAICA AVENUE — 11
  4. WASHINGTON AVENUE — 11
  5. LENOX AVENUE — 10
  6. MACDOUGAL STREET — 10
  7. BROADWAY — 9
  8. BRUCKNER BOULEVARD — 8
  9. BROOKLYN AVENUE — 7
  10. NORTHERN BOULEVARD — 7
  11. 76 STREET — 7
  12. COURT STREET — 6
  13. EAST 74 STREET — 6
  14. GRAND STREET — 5
  15. BUSHWICK AVENUE — 5
  16. EAST 3 STREET — 5
  17. SENECA AVENUE — 5
  18. 111 AVENUE — 5
  19. AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS — 5
  20. AMSTERDAM AVENUE — 5

cross_street_1 categorical

324 singleton categories
rows1,000
null80 (8.0%)
unique511
top_valueAVENUE OF THE AMERICAS
top_rate0.038
cardinality511
entropy8.574
entropy_ratio0.953
Show data table
Top values for cross_street_1 (20 unique shown, of 511 total).
valuecountshare
AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS353.5%
BLEECKER STREET111.1%
AMSTERDAM AVENUE111.1%
WEST 113 STREET80.8%
HIMROD STREET80.8%
112 STREET80.8%
ST PAULS PLACE80.8%
DEXTER COURT80.8%
EAST TREMONT AVENUE70.7%
BROADWAY70.7%
BEND60.6%
107 AVENUE60.6%
80 STREET60.6%
AVENUE B60.6%
3 AVENUE60.6%
EAST 182 STREET50.5%
5 AVENUE50.5%
4 AVENUE50.5%
VANDAM STREET50.5%
DEAD END50.5%
Top values (rank 1–20)
  1. AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS — 35
  2. BLEECKER STREET — 11
  3. AMSTERDAM AVENUE — 11
  4. WEST 113 STREET — 8
  5. HIMROD STREET — 8
  6. 112 STREET — 8
  7. ST PAULS PLACE — 8
  8. DEXTER COURT — 8
  9. EAST TREMONT AVENUE — 7
  10. BROADWAY — 7
  11. BEND — 6
  12. 107 AVENUE — 6
  13. 80 STREET — 6
  14. AVENUE B — 6
  15. 3 AVENUE — 6
  16. EAST 182 STREET — 5
  17. 5 AVENUE — 5
  18. 4 AVENUE — 5
  19. VANDAM STREET — 5
  20. DEAD END — 5

cross_street_2 categorical

321 singleton categories
rows1,000
null79 (7.9%)
unique504
top_value7 AVENUE
top_rate0.039
cardinality504
entropy8.511
entropy_ratio0.948
Show data table
Top values for cross_street_2 (20 unique shown, of 504 total).
valuecountshare
7 AVENUE363.6%
BROADWAY191.9%
MINETTA LANE101.0%
DEAD END101.0%
109 AVENUE90.9%
EAST 171 STREET90.9%
WEST 114 STREET80.8%
HARMAN STREET80.8%
75 STREET80.8%
EDISON AVENUE70.7%
112 PLACE70.7%
BEND70.7%
AVENUE D60.6%
DITMAS AVENUE60.6%
EAST 174 STREET60.6%
10 AVENUE60.6%
3 AVENUE60.6%
1 AVENUE60.6%
EAST 170 STREET60.6%
BALTIC STREET60.6%
Top values (rank 1–20)
  1. 7 AVENUE — 36
  2. BROADWAY — 19
  3. MINETTA LANE — 10
  4. DEAD END — 10
  5. 109 AVENUE — 9
  6. EAST 171 STREET — 9
  7. WEST 114 STREET — 8
  8. HARMAN STREET — 8
  9. 75 STREET — 8
  10. EDISON AVENUE — 7
  11. 112 PLACE — 7
  12. BEND — 7
  13. AVENUE D — 6
  14. DITMAS AVENUE — 6
  15. EAST 174 STREET — 6
  16. 10 AVENUE — 6
  17. 3 AVENUE — 6
  18. 1 AVENUE — 6
  19. EAST 170 STREET — 6
  20. BALTIC STREET — 6

intersection_street_1 categorical

319 singleton categories
rows1,000
null85 (8.5%)
unique506
top_valueAVENUE OF THE AMERICAS
top_rate0.038
cardinality506
entropy8.558
entropy_ratio0.953
Show data table
Top values for intersection_street_1 (20 unique shown, of 506 total).
valuecountshare
AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS353.5%
BLEECKER STREET111.1%
AMSTERDAM AVENUE111.1%
WEST 113 STREET80.8%
HIMROD STREET80.8%
112 STREET80.8%
ST PAULS PLACE80.8%
DEXTER COURT80.8%
EAST TREMONT AVENUE70.7%
BROADWAY70.7%
BEND60.6%
5 AVENUE60.6%
107 AVENUE60.6%
80 STREET60.6%
AVENUE B60.6%
3 AVENUE60.6%
EAST 182 STREET50.5%
4 AVENUE50.5%
VANDAM STREET50.5%
DEAD END50.5%
Top values (rank 1–20)
  1. AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS — 35
  2. BLEECKER STREET — 11
  3. AMSTERDAM AVENUE — 11
  4. WEST 113 STREET — 8
  5. HIMROD STREET — 8
  6. 112 STREET — 8
  7. ST PAULS PLACE — 8
  8. DEXTER COURT — 8
  9. EAST TREMONT AVENUE — 7
  10. BROADWAY — 7
  11. BEND — 6
  12. 5 AVENUE — 6
  13. 107 AVENUE — 6
  14. 80 STREET — 6
  15. AVENUE B — 6
  16. 3 AVENUE — 6
  17. EAST 182 STREET — 5
  18. 4 AVENUE — 5
  19. VANDAM STREET — 5
  20. DEAD END — 5

intersection_street_2 categorical

316 singleton categories
rows1,000
null84 (8.4%)
unique499
top_value7 AVENUE
top_rate0.039
cardinality499
entropy8.495
entropy_ratio0.948
Show data table
Top values for intersection_street_2 (20 unique shown, of 499 total).
valuecountshare
7 AVENUE363.6%
BROADWAY191.9%
MINETTA LANE101.0%
DEAD END101.0%
109 AVENUE90.9%
EAST 171 STREET90.9%
WEST 114 STREET80.8%
HARMAN STREET80.8%
75 STREET80.8%
EDISON AVENUE70.7%
112 PLACE70.7%
BEND70.7%
AVENUE D60.6%
DITMAS AVENUE60.6%
EAST 174 STREET60.6%
10 AVENUE60.6%
3 AVENUE60.6%
1 AVENUE60.6%
EAST 170 STREET60.6%
BALTIC STREET60.6%
Top values (rank 1–20)
  1. 7 AVENUE — 36
  2. BROADWAY — 19
  3. MINETTA LANE — 10
  4. DEAD END — 10
  5. 109 AVENUE — 9
  6. EAST 171 STREET — 9
  7. WEST 114 STREET — 8
  8. HARMAN STREET — 8
  9. 75 STREET — 8
  10. EDISON AVENUE — 7
  11. 112 PLACE — 7
  12. BEND — 7
  13. AVENUE D — 6
  14. DITMAS AVENUE — 6
  15. EAST 174 STREET — 6
  16. 10 AVENUE — 6
  17. 3 AVENUE — 6
  18. 1 AVENUE — 6
  19. EAST 170 STREET — 6
  20. BALTIC STREET — 6

address_type categorical

top value is 97.2% of rows
rows1,000
null2 (0.2%)
unique4
top_valueADDRESS
top_rate0.972
cardinality4
entropy0.217
entropy_ratio0.108
Show data table
Top values for address_type (4 unique shown, of 4 total).
valuecountshare
ADDRESS97097.0%
INTERSECTION191.9%
BLOCKFACE70.7%
PLACE20.2%
Top values (rank 1–20)
  1. ADDRESS — 970
  2. INTERSECTION — 19
  3. BLOCKFACE — 7
  4. PLACE — 2

city categorical

rows1,000
null21 (2.1%)
unique36
top_valueBROOKLYN
top_rate0.255
cardinality36
entropy3.282
entropy_ratio0.635
Show data table
Top values for city (20 unique shown, of 36 total).
valuecountshare
BROOKLYN25025.0%
NEW YORK24924.9%
BRONX19819.8%
WOODHAVEN353.5%
JAMAICA292.9%
RIDGEWOOD292.9%
CORONA202.0%
ASTORIA141.4%
ELMHURST141.4%
FOREST HILLS111.1%
STATEN ISLAND111.1%
SOUTH OZONE PARK111.1%
OZONE PARK90.9%
SOUTH RICHMOND HILL90.9%
REGO PARK90.9%
JACKSON HEIGHTS90.9%
RICHMOND HILL70.7%
COLLEGE POINT60.6%
QUEENS60.6%
WOODSIDE60.6%
Top values (rank 1–20)
  1. BROOKLYN — 250
  2. NEW YORK — 249
  3. BRONX — 198
  4. WOODHAVEN — 35
  5. JAMAICA — 29
  6. RIDGEWOOD — 29
  7. CORONA — 20
  8. ASTORIA — 14
  9. ELMHURST — 14
  10. FOREST HILLS — 11
  11. STATEN ISLAND — 11
  12. SOUTH OZONE PARK — 11
  13. OZONE PARK — 9
  14. SOUTH RICHMOND HILL — 9
  15. REGO PARK — 9
  16. JACKSON HEIGHTS — 9
  17. RICHMOND HILL — 7
  18. COLLEGE POINT — 6
  19. QUEENS — 6
  20. WOODSIDE — 6

landmark categorical

335 singleton categories
rows1,000
null105 (10.5%)
unique515
top_valueWEST 13 STREET
top_rate0.035
cardinality515
entropy8.603
entropy_ratio0.955
Show data table
Top values for landmark (20 unique shown, of 515 total).
valuecountshare
WEST 13 STREET313.1%
JAMAICA AVENUE111.1%
WASHINGTON AVENUE111.1%
LENOX AVENUE101.0%
MAC DOUGAL STREET101.0%
BRUCKNER BOULEVARD80.8%
BROADWAY80.8%
BROOKLYN AVENUE70.7%
NORTHERN BOULEVARD70.7%
76 STREET70.7%
COURT STREET60.6%
EAST 74 STREET60.6%
GRAND STREET50.5%
BUSHWICK AVENUE50.5%
EAST 3 STREET50.5%
SENECA AVENUE50.5%
111 AVENUE50.5%
AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS50.5%
MYRTLE AVENUE50.5%
90 STREET50.5%
Top values (rank 1–20)
  1. WEST 13 STREET — 31
  2. JAMAICA AVENUE — 11
  3. WASHINGTON AVENUE — 11
  4. LENOX AVENUE — 10
  5. MAC DOUGAL STREET — 10
  6. BRUCKNER BOULEVARD — 8
  7. BROADWAY — 8
  8. BROOKLYN AVENUE — 7
  9. NORTHERN BOULEVARD — 7
  10. 76 STREET — 7
  11. COURT STREET — 6
  12. EAST 74 STREET — 6
  13. GRAND STREET — 5
  14. BUSHWICK AVENUE — 5
  15. EAST 3 STREET — 5
  16. SENECA AVENUE — 5
  17. 111 AVENUE — 5
  18. AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS — 5
  19. MYRTLE AVENUE — 5
  20. 90 STREET — 5

status categorical

rows1,000
null0 (0.0%)
unique3
top_valueClosed
top_rate0.610
cardinality3
entropy1.260
entropy_ratio0.795
Show data table
Top values for status (3 unique shown, of 3 total).
valuecountshare
Closed61061.0%
In Progress30530.5%
Open858.5%
Top values (rank 1–20)
  1. Closed — 610
  2. In Progress — 305
  3. Open — 85

community_board categorical

rows1,000
null0 (0.0%)
unique65
top_value02 MANHATTAN
top_rate0.056
cardinality65
entropy5.610
entropy_ratio0.932
Show data table
Top values for community_board (20 unique shown, of 65 total).
valuecountshare
02 MANHATTAN565.6%
09 QUEENS484.8%
03 MANHATTAN383.8%
05 QUEENS383.8%
12 QUEENS303.0%
03 BRONX292.9%
12 MANHATTAN292.9%
10 MANHATTAN282.8%
08 BRONX282.8%
09 MANHATTAN282.8%
17 BROOKLYN272.7%
10 QUEENS272.7%
03 QUEENS252.5%
01 BROOKLYN242.4%
06 QUEENS242.4%
11 BROOKLYN232.3%
04 BROOKLYN222.2%
09 BRONX212.1%
04 QUEENS202.0%
10 BRONX202.0%
Top values (rank 1–20)
  1. 02 MANHATTAN — 56
  2. 09 QUEENS — 48
  3. 03 MANHATTAN — 38
  4. 05 QUEENS — 38
  5. 12 QUEENS — 30
  6. 03 BRONX — 29
  7. 12 MANHATTAN — 29
  8. 10 MANHATTAN — 28
  9. 08 BRONX — 28
  10. 09 MANHATTAN — 28
  11. 17 BROOKLYN — 27
  12. 10 QUEENS — 27
  13. 03 QUEENS — 25
  14. 01 BROOKLYN — 24
  15. 06 QUEENS — 24
  16. 11 BROOKLYN — 23
  17. 04 BROOKLYN — 22
  18. 09 BRONX — 21
  19. 04 QUEENS — 20
  20. 10 BRONX — 20

council_district categorical

rows1,000
null9 (0.9%)
unique51
top_value03
top_rate0.057
cardinality51
entropy5.412
entropy_ratio0.954
Show data table
Top values for council_district (20 unique shown, of 51 total).
valuecountshare
03565.6%
32484.8%
02393.9%
34383.8%
13363.6%
10363.6%
07333.3%
16323.2%
09323.2%
28303.0%
01282.8%
11262.6%
30252.5%
21252.5%
17242.4%
14242.4%
47242.4%
41232.3%
35222.2%
18222.2%
Top values (rank 1–20)
  1. 03 — 56
  2. 32 — 48
  3. 02 — 39
  4. 34 — 38
  5. 13 — 36
  6. 10 — 36
  7. 07 — 33
  8. 16 — 32
  9. 09 — 32
  10. 28 — 30
  11. 01 — 28
  12. 11 — 26
  13. 30 — 25
  14. 21 — 25
  15. 17 — 24
  16. 14 — 24
  17. 47 — 24
  18. 41 — 23
  19. 35 — 22
  20. 18 — 22

police_precinct categorical

rows1,000
null0 (0.0%)
unique76
top_valuePrecinct 6
top_rate0.050
cardinality76
entropy5.847
entropy_ratio0.936
Show data table
Top values for police_precinct (20 unique shown, of 76 total).
valuecountshare
Precinct 6505.0%
Precinct 102484.8%
Precinct 104383.8%
Precinct 42292.9%
Precinct 50282.8%
Precinct 67272.7%
Precinct 106272.7%
Precinct 30262.6%
Precinct 110242.4%
Precinct 112242.4%
Precinct 62232.3%
Precinct 115232.3%
Precinct 83222.2%
Precinct 43212.1%
Precinct 9202.0%
Precinct 103202.0%
Precinct 45202.0%
Precinct 49191.9%
Precinct 34191.9%
Precinct 32181.8%
Top values (rank 1–20)
  1. Precinct 6 — 50
  2. Precinct 102 — 48
  3. Precinct 104 — 38
  4. Precinct 42 — 29
  5. Precinct 50 — 28
  6. Precinct 67 — 27
  7. Precinct 106 — 27
  8. Precinct 30 — 26
  9. Precinct 110 — 24
  10. Precinct 112 — 24
  11. Precinct 62 — 23
  12. Precinct 115 — 23
  13. Precinct 83 — 22
  14. Precinct 43 — 21
  15. Precinct 9 — 20
  16. Precinct 103 — 20
  17. Precinct 45 — 20
  18. Precinct 49 — 19
  19. Precinct 34 — 19
  20. Precinct 32 — 18

bbl categorical

606 singleton categories
rows1,000
null55 (5.5%)
unique719
top_value1006080026
top_rate0.033
cardinality719
entropy9.189
entropy_ratio0.968
Show data table
Top values for bbl (20 unique shown, of 719 total).
valuecountshare
1006080026313.1%
3045950215131.3%
101823003380.8%
100542004880.8%
202902003680.8%
205419012270.7%
401706750170.7%
100504001150.5%
300396000450.5%
408838006550.5%
301740000150.5%
101618000140.4%
102217004740.4%
410146005140.4%
102170011240.4%
403427003040.4%
403430000130.3%
204323001430.3%
203943750130.3%
202409009630.3%
Top values (rank 1–20)
  1. 1006080026 — 31
  2. 3045950215 — 13
  3. 1018230033 — 8
  4. 1005420048 — 8
  5. 2029020036 — 8
  6. 2054190122 — 7
  7. 4017067501 — 7
  8. 1005040011 — 5
  9. 3003960004 — 5
  10. 4088380065 — 5
  11. 3017400001 — 5
  12. 1016180001 — 4
  13. 1022170047 — 4
  14. 4101460051 — 4
  15. 1021700112 — 4
  16. 4034270030 — 4
  17. 4034300001 — 3
  18. 2043230014 — 3
  19. 2039437501 — 3
  20. 2024090096 — 3

borough categorical

rows1,000
null0 (0.0%)
unique5
top_valueQUEENS
top_rate0.274
cardinality5
entropy2.057
entropy_ratio0.886
Show data table
Top values for borough (5 unique shown, of 5 total).
valuecountshare
QUEENS27427.4%
MANHATTAN25825.8%
BROOKLYN25425.4%
BRONX20320.3%
STATEN ISLAND111.1%
Top values (rank 1–20)
  1. QUEENS — 274
  2. MANHATTAN — 258
  3. BROOKLYN — 254
  4. BRONX — 203
  5. STATEN ISLAND — 11

x_coordinate_state_plane categorical

643 singleton categories
rows1,000
null7 (0.7%)
unique763
top_value984721
top_rate0.031
cardinality763
entropy9.292
entropy_ratio0.970
Show data table
Top values for x_coordinate_state_plane (20 unique shown, of 763 total).
valuecountshare
984721313.1%
1004501131.3%
99787080.8%
98403280.8%
101088580.8%
103196970.7%
98323850.5%
98587750.5%
102082550.5%
99907750.5%
99870340.4%
102382940.4%
100522440.4%
104146340.4%
100828540.4%
100832330.3%
99597130.3%
102217730.3%
100799230.3%
100127630.3%
Top values (rank 1–20)
  1. 984721 — 31
  2. 1004501 — 13
  3. 997870 — 8
  4. 984032 — 8
  5. 1010885 — 8
  6. 1031969 — 7
  7. 983238 — 5
  8. 985877 — 5
  9. 1020825 — 5
  10. 999077 — 5
  11. 998703 — 4
  12. 1023829 — 4
  13. 1005224 — 4
  14. 1041463 — 4
  15. 1008285 — 4
  16. 1008323 — 3
  17. 995971 — 3
  18. 1022177 — 3
  19. 1007992 — 3
  20. 1001276 — 3

y_coordinate_state_plane categorical

651 singleton categories
rows1,000
null7 (0.7%)
unique768
top_value207809
top_rate0.031
cardinality768
entropy9.304
entropy_ratio0.971
Show data table
Top values for y_coordinate_state_plane (20 unique shown, of 768 total).
valuecountshare
207809313.1%
180649131.3%
23092680.8%
20511180.8%
24421280.8%
24290070.7%
20392950.5%
18920550.5%
19190150.5%
19311050.5%
23031140.4%
21551140.4%
25326740.4%
19249740.4%
19707740.4%
19652630.3%
25086230.3%
24006130.3%
21197830.3%
20764930.3%
Top values (rank 1–20)
  1. 207809 — 31
  2. 180649 — 13
  3. 230926 — 8
  4. 205111 — 8
  5. 244212 — 8
  6. 242900 — 7
  7. 203929 — 5
  8. 189205 — 5
  9. 191901 — 5
  10. 193110 — 5
  11. 230311 — 4
  12. 215511 — 4
  13. 253267 — 4
  14. 192497 — 4
  15. 197077 — 4
  16. 196526 — 3
  17. 250862 — 3
  18. 240061 — 3
  19. 211978 — 3
  20. 207649 — 3

open_data_channel_type categorical

rows1,000
null0 (0.0%)
unique4
top_valueONLINE
top_rate0.466
cardinality4
entropy1.589
entropy_ratio0.794
Show data table
Top values for open_data_channel_type (4 unique shown, of 4 total).
valuecountshare
ONLINE46646.6%
MOBILE28828.8%
PHONE23623.6%
UNKNOWN101.0%
Top values (rank 1–20)
  1. ONLINE — 466
  2. MOBILE — 288
  3. PHONE — 236
  4. UNKNOWN — 10

park_facility_name categorical

top value is 99.9% of rows
rows1,000
null0 (0.0%)
unique2
top_valueUnspecified
top_rate0.999
cardinality2
entropy0.011
entropy_ratio0.011
Show data table
Top values for park_facility_name (2 unique shown, of 2 total).
valuecountshare
Unspecified99999.9%
Flushing Meadows Corona Park10.1%
Top values (rank 1–20)
  1. Unspecified — 999
  2. Flushing Meadows Corona Park — 1

park_borough categorical

rows1,000
null0 (0.0%)
unique5
top_valueQUEENS
top_rate0.274
cardinality5
entropy2.057
entropy_ratio0.886
Show data table
Top values for park_borough (5 unique shown, of 5 total).
valuecountshare
QUEENS27427.4%
MANHATTAN25825.8%
BROOKLYN25425.4%
BRONX20320.3%
STATEN ISLAND111.1%
Top values (rank 1–20)
  1. QUEENS — 274
  2. MANHATTAN — 258
  3. BROOKLYN — 254
  4. BRONX — 203
  5. STATEN ISLAND — 11

latitude categorical

655 singleton categories
rows1,000
null7 (0.7%)
unique770
top_value40.73706433046593
top_rate0.031
cardinality770
entropy9.308
entropy_ratio0.971
Show data table
Top values for latitude (20 unique shown, of 770 total).
valuecountshare
40.73706433046593313.1%
40.662493333971206131.3%
40.80050400034680580.8%
40.7296589937187580.8%
40.8369406629241780.8%
40.8332508510871170.7%
40.72641463677291550.5%
40.6860006389615650.5%
40.69332511094426550.5%
40.69670669192838450.5%
40.7988146702151340.4%
40.7581158095972340.4%
40.86180921113531640.4%
40.69485163390080440.4%
40.7075749538037440.4%
40.706062486329930.3%
40.8551516595575330.3%
40.8255556164952930.3%
40.7484908168886930.3%
40.7365293563731730.3%
Top values (rank 1–20)
  1. 40.73706433046593 — 31
  2. 40.662493333971206 — 13
  3. 40.800504000346805 — 8
  4. 40.72965899371875 — 8
  5. 40.83694066292417 — 8
  6. 40.83325085108711 — 7
  7. 40.726414636772915 — 5
  8. 40.68600063896156 — 5
  9. 40.693325110944265 — 5
  10. 40.696706691928384 — 5
  11. 40.79881467021513 — 4
  12. 40.75811580959723 — 4
  13. 40.861809211135316 — 4
  14. 40.694851633900804 — 4
  15. 40.70757495380374 — 4
  16. 40.7060624863299 — 3
  17. 40.85515165955753 — 3
  18. 40.82555561649529 — 3
  19. 40.74849081688869 — 3
  20. 40.73652935637317 — 3

longitude categorical

655 singleton categories
rows1,000
null7 (0.7%)
unique770
top_value-73.99830041620608
top_rate0.031
cardinality770
entropy9.308
entropy_ratio0.971
Show data table
Top values for longitude (20 unique shown, of 770 total).
valuecountshare
-73.99830041620608313.1%
-73.9270067970956131.3%
-73.9508059587071680.8%
-74.0007865564607880.8%
-73.9037444129810380.8%
-73.8275589387227770.7%
-74.0036511760836850.5%
-73.99413353445450.5%
-73.8681071731774950.5%
-73.9465297740722750.5%
-73.9477985726832840.4%
-73.8571356338648140.4%
-73.9241742271880940.4%
-73.7936798032137840.4%
-73.9133090617082640.4%
-73.9131739709097130.3%
-73.8628989683991530.3%
-73.9142140401405630.3%
-73.9385518485121830.3%
-73.8514372906424430.3%
Top values (rank 1–20)
  1. -73.99830041620608 — 31
  2. -73.9270067970956 — 13
  3. -73.95080595870716 — 8
  4. -74.00078655646078 — 8
  5. -73.90374441298103 — 8
  6. -73.82755893872277 — 7
  7. -74.00365117608368 — 5
  8. -73.994133534454 — 5
  9. -73.86810717317749 — 5
  10. -73.94652977407227 — 5
  11. -73.94779857268328 — 4
  12. -73.85713563386481 — 4
  13. -73.92417422718809 — 4
  14. -73.79367980321378 — 4
  15. -73.91330906170826 — 4
  16. -73.91317397090971 — 3
  17. -73.86289896839915 — 3
  18. -73.91421404014056 — 3
  19. -73.93855184851218 — 3
  20. -73.85143729064244 — 3

location unknown

no profiler for kind=unknown
rows1,000
null0 (0.0%)

:@computed_region_f5dn_yrer categorical

rows1,000
null7 (0.7%)
unique62
top_value57
top_rate0.056
cardinality62
entropy5.591
entropy_ratio0.939
Show data table
Top values for :@computed_region_f5dn_yrer (20 unique shown, of 62 total).
valuecountshare
57565.6%
46484.8%
70383.8%
54373.7%
41303.0%
34292.9%
47292.9%
18282.8%
48282.8%
37282.8%
61272.7%
62272.7%
65252.5%
36242.4%
1232.3%
42222.2%
58212.1%
40212.1%
66202.0%
43202.0%
Top values (rank 1–20)
  1. 57 — 56
  2. 46 — 48
  3. 70 — 38
  4. 54 — 37
  5. 41 — 30
  6. 34 — 29
  7. 47 — 29
  8. 18 — 28
  9. 48 — 28
  10. 37 — 28
  11. 61 — 27
  12. 62 — 27
  13. 65 — 25
  14. 36 — 24
  15. 1 — 23
  16. 42 — 22
  17. 58 — 21
  18. 40 — 21
  19. 66 — 20
  20. 43 — 20

:@computed_region_yeji_bk3q categorical

rows1,000
null7 (0.7%)
unique5
top_value3
top_rate0.271
cardinality5
entropy2.054
entropy_ratio0.885
Show data table
Top values for :@computed_region_yeji_bk3q (5 unique shown, of 5 total).
valuecountshare
326926.9%
426626.6%
225425.4%
519319.3%
1111.1%
Top values (rank 1–20)
  1. 3 — 269
  2. 4 — 266
  3. 2 — 254
  4. 5 — 193
  5. 1 — 11

:@computed_region_sbqj_enih categorical

rows1,000
null7 (0.7%)
unique75
top_value3
top_rate0.050
cardinality75
entropy5.846
entropy_ratio0.939
Show data table
Top values for :@computed_region_sbqj_enih (20 unique shown, of 75 total).
valuecountshare
3505.0%
60484.8%
62373.7%
25292.9%
33282.8%
40272.7%
64272.7%
19262.6%
68232.3%
37232.3%
73232.3%
53222.2%
26212.1%
70212.1%
61202.0%
28202.0%
32191.9%
5191.9%
22191.9%
20181.8%
Top values (rank 1–20)
  1. 3 — 50
  2. 60 — 48
  3. 62 — 37
  4. 25 — 29
  5. 33 — 28
  6. 40 — 27
  7. 64 — 27
  8. 19 — 26
  9. 68 — 23
  10. 37 — 23
  11. 73 — 23
  12. 53 — 22
  13. 26 — 21
  14. 70 — 21
  15. 61 — 20
  16. 28 — 20
  17. 32 — 19
  18. 5 — 19
  19. 22 — 19
  20. 20 — 18

:@computed_region_92fq_4b7q categorical

rows1,000
null7 (0.7%)
unique51
top_value10
top_rate0.064
cardinality51
entropy5.376
entropy_ratio0.948
Show data table
Top values for :@computed_region_92fq_4b7q (20 unique shown, of 51 total).
valuecountshare
10646.4%
34545.4%
30404.0%
36363.6%
32363.6%
12353.5%
39353.5%
46343.4%
23333.3%
42282.8%
50272.7%
21272.7%
43272.7%
40252.5%
28252.5%
48242.4%
45232.3%
29222.2%
17222.2%
35212.1%
Top values (rank 1–20)
  1. 10 — 64
  2. 34 — 54
  3. 30 — 40
  4. 36 — 36
  5. 32 — 36
  6. 12 — 35
  7. 39 — 35
  8. 46 — 34
  9. 23 — 33
  10. 42 — 28
  11. 50 — 27
  12. 21 — 27
  13. 43 — 27
  14. 40 — 25
  15. 28 — 25
  16. 48 — 24
  17. 45 — 23
  18. 29 — 22
  19. 17 — 22
  20. 35 — 21

descriptor_2 categorical

27 singleton categories 88.2% null
rows1,000
null882 (88.2%)
unique43
top_valueNO HEAT
top_rate0.280
cardinality43
entropy4.376
entropy_ratio0.807
Show data table
Top values for descriptor_2 (20 unique shown, of 43 total).
valuecountshare
NO HEAT333.3%
NO HEAT AND NO HOT WATER101.0%
N/A90.9%
NO HOT WATER70.7%
Cannabis Smoking or Vaping50.5%
ROACHES40.4%
Unsafe Driving - Non-Passenger30.3%
Dog30.3%
OTHER30.3%
Not Cleaned by Property Owner20.2%
Parked In Front Of Fire Hydrant20.2%
Operating Improperly20.2%
AT WALL OR CEILING20.2%
FLIES20.2%
BROKEN OR MISSING20.2%
MISSING OR INADEQUATE CANS/LID20.2%
Loose or Improperly Stored Garbage or Food10.1%
Droppings10.1%
Fare/Tip Complaint10.1%
Waste10.1%
Top values (rank 1–20)
  1. NO HEAT — 33
  2. NO HEAT AND NO HOT WATER — 10
  3. N/A — 9
  4. NO HOT WATER — 7
  5. Cannabis Smoking or Vaping — 5
  6. ROACHES — 4
  7. Unsafe Driving - Non-Passenger — 3
  8. Dog — 3
  9. OTHER — 3
  10. Not Cleaned by Property Owner — 2
  11. Parked In Front Of Fire Hydrant — 2
  12. Operating Improperly — 2
  13. AT WALL OR CEILING — 2
  14. FLIES — 2
  15. BROKEN OR MISSING — 2
  16. MISSING OR INADEQUATE CANS/LID — 2
  17. Loose or Improperly Stored Garbage or Food — 1
  18. Droppings — 1
  19. Fare/Tip Complaint — 1
  20. Waste — 1

resolution_description categorical

30.7% null
rows1,000
null307 (30.7%)
unique16
top_valueThe New York City Police Department responded to the complaint and their investigation determined that no criminal violation existed. The condition was corrected without the need to issue a summons or effect an arrest. If the problem persists, please contact 311 to create another complaint. If possible, provide contact information so responding officers may reach out to you for more details. If necessary, your complaint may be referred to your local precinct's special operations units (Quality of Life, etc.). Thank you for your attention to this matter. We count on New Yorkers like yourself to maintain a safe City, so please let us know if you see other conditions that require our attention.
top_rate0.354
cardinality16
entropy2.777
entropy_ratio0.694
Show data table
Top values for resolution_description (16 unique shown, of 16 total).
valuecountshare
The New York City Police Department responded to the complaint and their investigation determined that no criminal violation existed. The condition was corrected without the need to issue a summons or effect an arrest. If the problem persists, please contact 311 to create another complaint. If possible, provide contact information so responding officers may reach out to you for more details. If necessary, your complaint may be referred to your local precinct's special operations units (Quality of Life, etc.). Thank you for your attention to this matter. We count on New Yorkers like yourself to maintain a safe City, so please let us know if you see other conditions that require our attention.24524.5%
The New York City Police Department responded to the complaint and with the information available observed no evidence of a criminal violation at that time. If the problem persists, please contact 311 to create another complaint. If possible, provide contact information so responding officers may reach out to you for more details. If necessary, your complaint may be referred to your local precinct's special operations units (Quality of Life, etc.). We count on New Yorkers like yourself to maintain a safe City, so please let us know if you see other conditions that require our attention.16116.1%
The New York City Police Department responded to the complaint and their investigation determined that a violation of law occurred. Police issued a summons in response to the complaint. Thank you for attention to this matter. We count on New Yorkers like yourself to maintain a safe City, so please let us know if you see other conditions that require our attention.686.8%
The New York City Police Department responded to the complaint but officers were unable to gain entry into the premises. If the problem persists, please contact 311 to create another complaint and ensure that contact information (e.g., buzzer number, phone number, etc.) is available to assist the responding officers in gaining entry to properly investigate the complaint. We count on New Yorkers like yourself to maintain a safe City, so please let us know if you see other conditions that require our attention.505.0%
The following complaint conditions are still open. HPD has already attempted to notify the property owner that the condition exists; the tenant should provide access for the owner to make the repair. HPD may attempt to contact the tenant by phone to verify the correction of the condition or an HPD Inspector may attempt to conduct an inspection.444.4%
The New York City Police Department responded to the complaint and their investigation determined that police action was not necessary. If the problem persists, please contact 311 to create another complaint. If possible, provide contact information so responding officers may reach out to you for more details. We count on New Yorkers like yourself to maintain a safe City, so please let us know if you see other conditions that require our attention.404.0%
The New York City Police Department responded to the complaint and observed no criminal violation upon their arrival. If the problem persists, please contact 311 to create another complaint. If possible, provide contact information so responding officers may reach out to you for more details. We count on New Yorkers like yourself to maintain a safe City, so please let us know if you see other conditions that require our attention.313.1%
This complaint is a duplicate of a building-wide condition already reported by another tenant. The original complaint is still open, and HPD may only need to confirm that the condition exists by inspecting one apartment. If we cannot contact the tenant from the original complaint or get access to that apartment, HPD may attempt to contact the person who filed this complaint to verify the correction of the condition or may conduct an inspection of your unit. You can check HPDONLINE to see if a292.9%
The Department of Transportation referred this complaint to the appropriate Maintenance Unit for repair.60.6%
Your complaint has been received but does not fall under the jurisdiction of the New York City Police Department. Please contact your local precinct for more information, including which City agency your request was referred to. We count on New Yorkers like yourself to maintain a safe City, so please let us know if you see other conditions that require our attention.50.5%
The Police Department reviewed your complaint and provided additional information below.40.4%
The New York City Police Department responded to the complaint and a report was prepared as part of their investigation. Thank you for attention to this matter. We count on New Yorkers like yourself to maintain a safe City, so please let us know if you see other conditions that require our attention.30.3%
The Department of Health and Mental Hygiene has sent official written notification to the Owner/Landlord warning them of potential violations and instructing them to correct the situation. If the situation persists 21 days after your initial complaint, please make a new complaint.30.3%
The New York City Police Department responded to the complaint and observed an encampment at the noted location. The complaint has been referred to the Department of Homeless Services (DHS) for further action. DHS will inspect the condition and update your service request with more information. Thank you for attention to this matter. We count on New Yorkers like yourself to maintain a safe City, so please let us know if you see other conditions that require our attention.20.2%
Your complaint has been received by the New York City Police Department and assigned to a unit at your local precinct. The responding officers will conduct an assessment of the complaint and may contact you for further information, if you left contact information. Our team is committed to resolving this matter promptly, and we appreciate your contribution to maintaining the well-being of our community.10.1%
The New York City Police Department responded to the complaint and their investigation determined another specific tow is required. Please contact the local precinct for more information. Thank you for attention to this matter. We count on New Yorkers like yourself to maintain a safe City, so please let us know if you see other conditions that require our attention.10.1%
Top values (rank 1–20)
  1. The New York City Police Department responded to the complaint and their investigation determined that no criminal violation existed. The condition was corrected without the need to issue a summons or effect an arrest. If the problem persists, please contact 311 to create another complaint. If possible, provide contact information so responding officers may reach out to you for more details. If necessary, your complaint may be referred to your local precinct's special operations units (Quality of Life, etc.). Thank you for your attention to this matter. We count on New Yorkers like yourself to maintain a safe City, so please let us know if you see other conditions that require our attention. — 245
  2. The New York City Police Department responded to the complaint and with the information available observed no evidence of a criminal violation at that time. If the problem persists, please contact 311 to create another complaint. If possible, provide contact information so responding officers may reach out to you for more details. If necessary, your complaint may be referred to your local precinct's special operations units (Quality of Life, etc.). We count on New Yorkers like yourself to maintain a safe City, so please let us know if you see other conditions that require our attention. — 161
  3. The New York City Police Department responded to the complaint and their investigation determined that a violation of law occurred. Police issued a summons in response to the complaint. Thank you for attention to this matter. We count on New Yorkers like yourself to maintain a safe City, so please let us know if you see other conditions that require our attention. — 68
  4. The New York City Police Department responded to the complaint but officers were unable to gain entry into the premises. If the problem persists, please contact 311 to create another complaint and ensure that contact information (e.g., buzzer number, phone number, etc.) is available to assist the responding officers in gaining entry to properly investigate the complaint. We count on New Yorkers like yourself to maintain a safe City, so please let us know if you see other conditions that require our attention. — 50
  5. The following complaint conditions are still open. HPD has already attempted to notify the property owner that the condition exists; the tenant should provide access for the owner to make the repair. HPD may attempt to contact the tenant by phone to verify the correction of the condition or an HPD Inspector may attempt to conduct an inspection. — 44
  6. The New York City Police Department responded to the complaint and their investigation determined that police action was not necessary. If the problem persists, please contact 311 to create another complaint. If possible, provide contact information so responding officers may reach out to you for more details. We count on New Yorkers like yourself to maintain a safe City, so please let us know if you see other conditions that require our attention. — 40
  7. The New York City Police Department responded to the complaint and observed no criminal violation upon their arrival. If the problem persists, please contact 311 to create another complaint. If possible, provide contact information so responding officers may reach out to you for more details. We count on New Yorkers like yourself to maintain a safe City, so please let us know if you see other conditions that require our attention. — 31
  8. This complaint is a duplicate of a building-wide condition already reported by another tenant. The original complaint is still open, and HPD may only need to confirm that the condition exists by inspecting one apartment. If we cannot contact the tenant from the original complaint or get access to that apartment, HPD may attempt to contact the person who filed this complaint to verify the correction of the condition or may conduct an inspection of your unit. You can check HPDONLINE to see if a — 29
  9. The Department of Transportation referred this complaint to the appropriate Maintenance Unit for repair. — 6
  10. Your complaint has been received but does not fall under the jurisdiction of the New York City Police Department. Please contact your local precinct for more information, including which City agency your request was referred to. We count on New Yorkers like yourself to maintain a safe City, so please let us know if you see other conditions that require our attention. — 5
  11. The Police Department reviewed your complaint and provided additional information below. — 4
  12. The New York City Police Department responded to the complaint and a report was prepared as part of their investigation. Thank you for attention to this matter. We count on New Yorkers like yourself to maintain a safe City, so please let us know if you see other conditions that require our attention. — 3
  13. The Department of Health and Mental Hygiene has sent official written notification to the Owner/Landlord warning them of potential violations and instructing them to correct the situation. If the situation persists 21 days after your initial complaint, please make a new complaint. — 3
  14. The New York City Police Department responded to the complaint and observed an encampment at the noted location. The complaint has been referred to the Department of Homeless Services (DHS) for further action. DHS will inspect the condition and update your service request with more information. Thank you for attention to this matter. We count on New Yorkers like yourself to maintain a safe City, so please let us know if you see other conditions that require our attention. — 2
  15. Your complaint has been received by the New York City Police Department and assigned to a unit at your local precinct. The responding officers will conduct an assessment of the complaint and may contact you for further information, if you left contact information. Our team is committed to resolving this matter promptly, and we appreciate your contribution to maintaining the well-being of our community. — 1
  16. The New York City Police Department responded to the complaint and their investigation determined another specific tow is required. Please contact the local precinct for more information. Thank you for attention to this matter. We count on New Yorkers like yourself to maintain a safe City, so please let us know if you see other conditions that require our attention. — 1

resolution_action_updated_date categorical

548 singleton categories 30.6% null
rows1,000
null306 (30.6%)
unique585
top_value2026-01-17T00:00:00.000
top_rate0.107
cardinality585
entropy8.673
entropy_ratio0.944
Show data table
Top values for resolution_action_updated_date (20 unique shown, of 585 total).
valuecountshare
2026-01-17T00:00:00.000747.4%
2026-01-18T02:03:44.00020.2%
2026-01-18T02:04:03.00020.2%
2026-01-18T02:01:54.00020.2%
2026-01-18T01:35:08.00020.2%
2026-01-18T01:41:49.00020.2%
2026-01-18T01:26:35.00020.2%
2026-01-18T01:32:28.00020.2%
2026-01-18T01:25:53.00020.2%
2026-01-18T01:54:39.00020.2%
2026-01-18T01:19:59.00020.2%
2026-01-18T01:09:47.00020.2%
2026-01-18T01:00:57.00020.2%
2026-01-18T01:04:36.00020.2%
2026-01-18T00:58:56.00020.2%
2026-01-18T01:07:50.00020.2%
2026-01-18T01:27:34.00020.2%
2026-01-18T00:46:07.00020.2%
2026-01-18T00:55:02.00020.2%
2026-01-18T00:40:32.00020.2%
Top values (rank 1–20)
  1. 2026-01-17T00:00:00.000 — 74
  2. 2026-01-18T02:03:44.000 — 2
  3. 2026-01-18T02:04:03.000 — 2
  4. 2026-01-18T02:01:54.000 — 2
  5. 2026-01-18T01:35:08.000 — 2
  6. 2026-01-18T01:41:49.000 — 2
  7. 2026-01-18T01:26:35.000 — 2
  8. 2026-01-18T01:32:28.000 — 2
  9. 2026-01-18T01:25:53.000 — 2
  10. 2026-01-18T01:54:39.000 — 2
  11. 2026-01-18T01:19:59.000 — 2
  12. 2026-01-18T01:09:47.000 — 2
  13. 2026-01-18T01:00:57.000 — 2
  14. 2026-01-18T01:04:36.000 — 2
  15. 2026-01-18T00:58:56.000 — 2
  16. 2026-01-18T01:07:50.000 — 2
  17. 2026-01-18T01:27:34.000 — 2
  18. 2026-01-18T00:46:07.000 — 2
  19. 2026-01-18T00:55:02.000 — 2
  20. 2026-01-18T00:40:32.000 — 2

closed_date categorical

561 singleton categories 39.0% null
rows1,000
null390 (39.0%)
unique585
top_value2026-01-18T00:41:26.000
top_rate4.92e-03
cardinality585
entropy9.169
entropy_ratio0.998
Show data table
Top values for closed_date (20 unique shown, of 585 total).
valuecountshare
2026-01-18T00:41:26.00030.3%
2026-01-18T02:02:35.00020.2%
2026-01-18T02:03:41.00020.2%
2026-01-18T01:41:47.00020.2%
2026-01-18T01:26:28.00020.2%
2026-01-18T01:45:29.00020.2%
2026-01-18T01:54:33.00020.2%
2026-01-18T01:07:46.00020.2%
2026-01-18T01:27:29.00020.2%
2026-01-18T00:46:04.00020.2%
2026-01-18T00:40:28.00020.2%
2026-01-18T00:55:27.00020.2%
2026-01-18T00:41:08.00020.2%
2026-01-18T00:20:14.00020.2%
2026-01-18T00:37:27.00020.2%
2026-01-18T00:22:36.00020.2%
2026-01-18T00:36:52.00020.2%
2026-01-18T00:17:49.00020.2%
2026-01-18T00:28:52.00020.2%
2026-01-18T00:20:55.00020.2%
Top values (rank 1–20)
  1. 2026-01-18T00:41:26.000 — 3
  2. 2026-01-18T02:02:35.000 — 2
  3. 2026-01-18T02:03:41.000 — 2
  4. 2026-01-18T01:41:47.000 — 2
  5. 2026-01-18T01:26:28.000 — 2
  6. 2026-01-18T01:45:29.000 — 2
  7. 2026-01-18T01:54:33.000 — 2
  8. 2026-01-18T01:07:46.000 — 2
  9. 2026-01-18T01:27:29.000 — 2
  10. 2026-01-18T00:46:04.000 — 2
  11. 2026-01-18T00:40:28.000 — 2
  12. 2026-01-18T00:55:27.000 — 2
  13. 2026-01-18T00:41:08.000 — 2
  14. 2026-01-18T00:20:14.000 — 2
  15. 2026-01-18T00:37:27.000 — 2
  16. 2026-01-18T00:22:36.000 — 2
  17. 2026-01-18T00:36:52.000 — 2
  18. 2026-01-18T00:17:49.000 — 2
  19. 2026-01-18T00:28:52.000 — 2
  20. 2026-01-18T00:20:55.000 — 2

taxi_pick_up_location categorical

6 singleton categories 99.4% null
rows1,000
null994 (99.4%)
unique6
top_value55 LITTLE WEST 12 STREET, MANHATTAN (NEW YORK), NY, 10014
top_rate0.167
cardinality6
entropy2.585
entropy_ratio1.000
Show data table
Top values for taxi_pick_up_location (6 unique shown, of 6 total).
valuecountshare
55 LITTLE WEST 12 STREET, MANHATTAN (NEW YORK), NY, 1001410.1%
JOHN F KENNEDY AIRPORT, QUEENS (JAMAICA) ,NY, 1143010.1%
11 WATER STREET, BROOKLYN, NY, 1120110.1%
9 AVENUE AND WEST 43 STREET, MANHATTAN, NY, 1003610.1%
30 AVENUE AND 33 STREET, QUEENS, NY, 1110210.1%
30-08 33 STREET, QUEENS (ASTORIA), NY, 1110210.1%
Top values (rank 1–20)
  1. 55 LITTLE WEST 12 STREET, MANHATTAN (NEW YORK), NY, 10014 — 1
  2. JOHN F KENNEDY AIRPORT, QUEENS (JAMAICA) ,NY, 11430 — 1
  3. 11 WATER STREET, BROOKLYN, NY, 11201 — 1
  4. 9 AVENUE AND WEST 43 STREET, MANHATTAN, NY, 10036 — 1
  5. 30 AVENUE AND 33 STREET, QUEENS, NY, 11102 — 1
  6. 30-08 33 STREET, QUEENS (ASTORIA), NY, 11102 — 1

vehicle_type categorical

96.5% null
rows1,000
null965 (96.5%)
unique4
top_valueCar
top_rate0.771
cardinality4
entropy1.097
entropy_ratio0.548
Show data table
Top values for vehicle_type (4 unique shown, of 4 total).
valuecountshare
Car272.7%
Other40.4%
SUV30.3%
Van10.1%
Top values (rank 1–20)
  1. Car — 27
  2. Other — 4
  3. SUV — 3
  4. Van — 1

facility_type categorical

99.0% null top value is 100.0% of rows
rows1,000
null990 (99.0%)
unique1
top_valueN/A
top_rate1.000
cardinality1
entropy-0.000
entropy_ratio0.000
Show data table
Top values for facility_type (1 unique shown, of 1 total).
valuecountshare
N/A101.0%
Top values (rank 1–20)
  1. N/A — 10

taxi_company_borough categorical

1 singleton categories 99.9% null top value is 100.0% of rows
rows1,000
null999 (99.9%)
unique1
top_valueBROOKLYN
top_rate1.000
cardinality1
entropy-0.000
entropy_ratio0.000
Show data table
Top values for taxi_company_borough (1 unique shown, of 1 total).
valuecountshare
BROOKLYN10.1%
Top values (rank 1–20)
  1. BROOKLYN — 1

bridge_highway_name categorical

99.7% null
rows1,000
null997 (99.7%)
unique2
top_valueE
top_rate0.667
cardinality2
entropy0.918
entropy_ratio0.918
Show data table
Top values for bridge_highway_name (2 unique shown, of 2 total).
valuecountshare
E20.2%
Kosciuszko Br - BQE10.1%
Top values (rank 1–20)
  1. E — 2
  2. Kosciuszko Br - BQE — 1

bridge_highway_direction categorical

99.7% null
rows1,000
null997 (99.7%)
unique2
top_valueC E Local Downtown & Brooklyn
top_rate0.667
cardinality2
entropy0.918
entropy_ratio0.918
Show data table
Top values for bridge_highway_direction (2 unique shown, of 2 total).
valuecountshare
C E Local Downtown & Brooklyn20.2%
Queens Bound10.1%
Top values (rank 1–20)
  1. C E Local Downtown & Brooklyn — 2
  2. Queens Bound — 1

road_ramp categorical

1 singleton categories 99.9% null top value is 100.0% of rows
rows1,000
null999 (99.9%)
unique1
top_valueRamp
top_rate1.000
cardinality1
entropy-0.000
entropy_ratio0.000
Show data table
Top values for road_ramp (1 unique shown, of 1 total).
valuecountshare
Ramp10.1%
Top values (rank 1–20)
  1. Ramp — 1

bridge_highway_segment categorical

99.7% null
rows1,000
null997 (99.7%)
unique2
top_valuePlatform
top_rate0.667
cardinality2
entropy0.918
entropy_ratio0.918
Show data table
Top values for bridge_highway_segment (2 unique shown, of 2 total).
valuecountshare
Platform20.2%
Ramp10.1%
Top values (rank 1–20)
  1. Platform — 2
  2. Ramp — 1