saturn·

accessibility atlas cms medicaid enrollment 2026

saturn notebook · generated 2026-05-01 Report Notebook

Overview

Source: /home/coolhand/datasets/accessibility-atlas/cms_medicaid_enrollment_2026.csv

Saturn profiled 10,302 rows across 44 columns. The stats below are deterministic and machine-readable; the prose is a language-model interpretation of those stats (opt-in, added after the fact, never sees raw rows).

[2]:
!pip install saturn-dissect
import subprocess
subprocess.run([
    "saturn", "analyze", "/home/coolhand/datasets/accessibility-atlas/cms_medicaid_enrollment_2026.csv",
    "--findings", "accessibility-atlas-cms_medicaid_enrollment_2026.json",
    "--llm", "anthropic:claude-opus-4-7",
])

Summary confidence: high

This dataset contains 10,302 monthly state-level records (51 states across 102 reporting periods from 201309 to 202510) tracking Medicaid and CHIP enrollment, application processing, eligibility determinations, and call center performance. The headline metric, Total Medicaid and CHIP Enrollment, is nearly complete and ranges from 0 to about 14.46M with a median of roughly 1.03M, while most other operational metrics are heavily right-skewed with substantial outliers. Two things deserve a closer look first: missingness is very uneven — Total Adult Medicaid Enrollment is 84.7% null and the call center metrics are ~69% null, while core enrollment fields are essentially complete — and the 'State Expanded Medicaid' flag splits the panel roughly 73%/27% (Y/N), which is a natural cut for comparison. The Final Report and Preliminary/Updated flags are exactly 50/50, suggesting each record appears in both a preliminary and final form, so deduplication may be needed before aggregation.

citing: row_count · column_count · Total Medicaid and CHIP Enrollment · Total Adult Medicaid Enrollment · Average Call Center Wait Time (Minutes) · Average Call Center Abandonment Rate · State Expanded Medicaid · Final Report · Preliminary or Updated · State Name · Reporting Period

Out[4]:

saturn.schema() · 44 columns

column kind n null% unique alerts
State Abbreviation categorical 10,302 0.0% 51
State Name categorical 10,302 0.0% 51
Reporting Period numeric 10,302 0.0% 102
State Expanded Medicaid categorical 10,302 0.0% 2
Preliminary or Updated categorical 10,302 0.0% 2
Final Report categorical 10,302 0.0% 2
New Applications Submitted to Medicaid and CHIP Agencies numeric 10,302 0.5% 5,378 high_skew outliers
New Applications Submitted to Medicaid and CHIP Agencies - footnotes categorical 10,302 76.6% 18 null_rate
Applications for Financial Assistance Submitted to the State Based Marketplace numeric 10,302 0.5% 1,373 high_skew outliers
Applications for Financial Assistance Submitted to the State Based Marketplace - footnotes categorical 10,302 97.4% 3 null_rate
Total Applications for Financial Assistance Submitted at State Level numeric 10,302 0.5% 5,591 high_skew outliers
Total Applications for Financial Assistance Submitted at State Level - footnotes categorical 10,302 73.4% 17 null_rate
Individuals Determined Eligible for Medicaid at Application numeric 10,302 0.5% 5,568 high_skew outliers
Individuals Determined Eligible for Medicaid at Application - footnotes categorical 10,302 72.8% 18 null_rate
Individuals Determined Eligible for CHIP at Application numeric 10,302 0.5% 3,064 high_skew outliers
Individuals Determined Eligible for CHIP at Application - footnotes categorical 10,302 91.0% 7 null_rate
Total Medicaid and CHIP Determinations numeric 10,302 0.5% 5,587 high_skew outliers
Total Medicaid and CHIP Determinations - footnotes categorical 10,302 81.6% 12 null_rate
Medicaid and CHIP Child Enrollment numeric 10,302 0.5% 8,094 high_skew outliers
Medicaid and CHIP Child Enrollment - footnotes categorical 10,302 92.2% 7 null_rate
Total Medicaid and CHIP Enrollment numeric 10,302 0.0% 8,309 high_skew outliers
Total Medicaid and CHIP Enrollment - footnotes categorical 10,302 93.1% 9 null_rate
Total Medicaid Enrollment numeric 10,302 0.5% 8,221 high_skew outliers
Total Medicaid Enrollment - footnotes categorical 10,302 93.2% 7 null_rate
Total CHIP Enrollment numeric 10,302 0.5% 7,918 high_skew outliers
Total CHIP Enrollment - footnotes categorical 10,302 95.9% 4 null_rate
Total Adult Medicaid Enrollment numeric 10,302 84.7% 1,415 null_rate high_skew
Total Adult Medicaid Enrollment - footnotes categorical 10,302 98.8% 4 null_rate
Total Medicaid and CHIP Determinations Processed in Less than 24 Hours numeric 10,302 43.1% 2,701 null_rate high_skew outliers
Total Medicaid and CHIP Determinations Processed in Less than 24 Hours - footnotes categorical 10,302 89.2% 20 null_rate
Total Medicaid and CHIP Determinations Processed Between 24 Hours and 7 Days numeric 10,302 43.1% 2,559 null_rate high_skew outliers
Total Medicaid and CHIP Determinations Processed Between 24 Hours and 7 Days - footnotes categorical 10,302 89.2% 21 null_rate
Total Medicaid and CHIP Determinations Processed Between 8 Days and 30 Days numeric 10,302 43.1% 2,608 null_rate high_skew outliers
Total Medicaid and CHIP Determinations Processed Between 8 Days and 30 Days - footnotes categorical 10,302 89.3% 16 null_rate
Total Medicaid and CHIP Determinations Processed between 31 days and 45 days numeric 10,302 43.1% 1,923 null_rate high_skew outliers
Total Medicaid and CHIP Determinations Processed between 31 days and 45 days - footnotes categorical 10,302 89.3% 15 null_rate
Total Medicaid and CHIP Determinations Processed in More than 45 Days numeric 10,302 43.1% 1,691 null_rate high_skew outliers
Total Medicaid and CHIP Determinations Processed in More than 45 Days - footnotes categorical 10,302 89.3% 15 null_rate
Total Call Center Volume (Number of Calls) numeric 10,302 69.5% 1,592 null_rate high_skew outliers
Total Call Center Volume (Number of Calls) - footnotes categorical 10,302 71.0% 27 null_rate
Average Call Center Wait Time (Minutes) numeric 10,302 69.5% 63 null_rate
Average Call Center Wait Time (Minutes) - footnotes categorical 10,302 69.7% 44 null_rate
Average Call Center Abandonment Rate numeric 10,302 69.5% 408 null_rate
Average Call Center Abandonment Rate - footnotes categorical 10,302 69.7% 36 null_rate
Fig 1.
Total Medicaid and CHIP Enrollment · Headline enrollment metric — note the strong right skew and very large maximum dragging the mean above the median.
Show data table
Histogram bins for Total Medicaid and CHIP Enrollment (median: 1031822.0).
bincount
0 – 3.616e+052640
3.616e+05 – 7.231e+051192
7.231e+05 – 1.085e+061581
1.085e+06 – 1.446e+061149
1.446e+06 – 1.808e+061171
1.808e+06 – 2.169e+06726
2.169e+06 – 2.531e+06291
2.531e+06 – 2.893e+06207
2.893e+06 – 3.254e+06331
3.254e+06 – 3.616e+06143
3.616e+06 – 3.977e+06175
3.977e+06 – 4.339e+06106
4.339e+06 – 4.7e+0684
4.7e+06 – 5.062e+0642
5.062e+06 – 5.423e+0626
5.423e+06 – 5.785e+0619
5.785e+06 – 6.147e+0675
6.147e+06 – 6.508e+0620
6.508e+06 – 6.87e+0651
6.87e+06 – 7.231e+0635
7.231e+06 – 7.593e+0632
7.593e+06 – 7.954e+063
7.954e+06 – 8.316e+060
8.316e+06 – 8.678e+060
8.678e+06 – 9.039e+060
9.039e+06 – 9.401e+060
9.401e+06 – 9.762e+060
9.762e+06 – 1.012e+070
1.012e+07 – 1.049e+070
1.049e+07 – 1.085e+070
1.085e+07 – 1.121e+070
1.121e+07 – 1.157e+076
1.157e+07 – 1.193e+0735
1.193e+07 – 1.229e+0738
1.229e+07 – 1.265e+0711
1.265e+07 – 1.302e+0710
1.302e+07 – 1.338e+0723
1.338e+07 – 1.374e+0739
1.374e+07 – 1.41e+0721
1.41e+07 – 1.446e+0718
Fig 2.
State Expanded Medicaid · About 73% of records come from states that expanded Medicaid, a useful split for any comparative analysis.
Show data table
Top values for State Expanded Medicaid (2 unique shown, of 2 total).
valuecountshare
Y747572.6%
N282727.4%
Fig 3.
State Name · All 51 jurisdictions appear exactly 202 times, confirming the panel is balanced across states.
Show data table
Top values for State Name (20 unique shown, of 51 total).
valuecountshare
Alaska2022.0%
Alabama2022.0%
Arkansas2022.0%
Arizona2022.0%
California2022.0%
Colorado2022.0%
Connecticut2022.0%
District of Columbia2022.0%
Delaware2022.0%
Florida2022.0%
Georgia2022.0%
Hawaii2022.0%
Iowa2022.0%
Idaho2022.0%
Illinois2022.0%
Indiana2022.0%
Kansas2022.0%
Kentucky2022.0%
Louisiana2022.0%
Massachusetts2022.0%
Fig 4.
Average Call Center Wait Time (Minutes) · Wait times cluster low (median 5 min) but stretch to 72 minutes — check the long tail and the ~70% missingness before using.
Show data table
Histogram bins for Average Call Center Wait Time (Minutes) (median: 5.0).
bincount
0 – 1.8942
1.8 – 3.6417
3.6 – 5.4329
5.4 – 7.2188
7.2 – 980
9 – 10.8116
10.8 – 12.6168
12.6 – 14.4103
14.4 – 16.2106
16.2 – 1843
18 – 19.886
19.8 – 21.675
21.6 – 23.473
23.4 – 25.250
25.2 – 2720
27 – 28.844
28.8 – 30.648
30.6 – 32.447
32.4 – 34.238
34.2 – 3615
36 – 37.828
37.8 – 39.628
39.6 – 41.46
41.4 – 43.215
43.2 – 4512
45 – 46.814
46.8 – 48.610
48.6 – 50.42
50.4 – 52.24
52.2 – 542
54 – 55.80
55.8 – 57.610
57.6 – 59.412
59.4 – 61.23
61.2 – 632
63 – 64.82
64.8 – 66.64
66.6 – 68.40
68.4 – 70.20
70.2 – 723
Fig 5.
Reporting Period · Coverage spans 201309–202510; check the distribution to see whether earlier periods are thinner than recent ones.
Show data table
Histogram bins for Reporting Period (median: 202107.5).
bincount
2.013e+05 – 2.013e+0551
2.013e+05 – 2.014e+050
2.014e+05 – 2.014e+050
2.014e+05 – 2.014e+050
2.014e+05 – 2.015e+050
2.015e+05 – 2.015e+050
2.015e+05 – 2.015e+050
2.015e+05 – 2.015e+050
2.015e+05 – 2.016e+050
2.016e+05 – 2.016e+050
2.016e+05 – 2.016e+050
2.016e+05 – 2.017e+050
2.017e+05 – 2.017e+050
2.017e+05 – 2.017e+05714
2.017e+05 – 2.018e+050
2.018e+05 – 2.018e+050
2.018e+05 – 2.018e+051224
2.018e+05 – 2.018e+050
2.018e+05 – 2.019e+050
2.019e+05 – 2.019e+05918
2.019e+05 – 2.019e+05306
2.019e+05 – 2.02e+050
2.02e+05 – 2.02e+050
2.02e+05 – 2.02e+051224
2.02e+05 – 2.021e+050
2.021e+05 – 2.021e+050
2.021e+05 – 2.021e+051224
2.021e+05 – 2.021e+050
2.021e+05 – 2.022e+050
2.022e+05 – 2.022e+05918
2.022e+05 – 2.022e+05306
2.022e+05 – 2.023e+050
2.023e+05 – 2.023e+050
2.023e+05 – 2.023e+051224
2.023e+05 – 2.024e+050
2.024e+05 – 2.024e+050
2.024e+05 – 2.024e+051224
2.024e+05 – 2.024e+050
2.024e+05 – 2.025e+050
2.025e+05 – 2.025e+05969
Fig 6.
Per-column null rate across the corpus. Columns are ordered by input position.
Show data table
Per-column null rate across the corpus.
columnkindnull %
State Abbreviationcategorical0.0%
State Namecategorical0.0%
Reporting Periodnumeric0.0%
State Expanded Medicaidcategorical0.0%
Preliminary or Updatedcategorical0.0%
Final Reportcategorical0.0%
New Applications Submitted to Medicaid and CHIP Agenciesnumeric0.5%
New Applications Submitted to Medicaid and CHIP Agencies - footnotescategorical76.6%
Applications for Financial Assistance Submitted to the State Based Marketplacenumeric0.5%
Applications for Financial Assistance Submitted to the State Based Marketplace - footnotescategorical97.4%
Total Applications for Financial Assistance Submitted at State Levelnumeric0.5%
Total Applications for Financial Assistance Submitted at State Level - footnotescategorical73.4%
Individuals Determined Eligible for Medicaid at Applicationnumeric0.5%
Individuals Determined Eligible for Medicaid at Application - footnotescategorical72.8%
Individuals Determined Eligible for CHIP at Applicationnumeric0.5%
Individuals Determined Eligible for CHIP at Application - footnotescategorical91.0%
Total Medicaid and CHIP Determinationsnumeric0.5%
Total Medicaid and CHIP Determinations - footnotescategorical81.6%
Medicaid and CHIP Child Enrollmentnumeric0.5%
Medicaid and CHIP Child Enrollment - footnotescategorical92.2%
Total Medicaid and CHIP Enrollmentnumeric0.0%
Total Medicaid and CHIP Enrollment - footnotescategorical93.1%
Total Medicaid Enrollmentnumeric0.5%
Total Medicaid Enrollment - footnotescategorical93.2%
Total CHIP Enrollmentnumeric0.5%
Total CHIP Enrollment - footnotescategorical95.9%
Total Adult Medicaid Enrollmentnumeric84.7%
Total Adult Medicaid Enrollment - footnotescategorical98.8%
Total Medicaid and CHIP Determinations Processed in Less than 24 Hoursnumeric43.1%
Total Medicaid and CHIP Determinations Processed in Less than 24 Hours - footnotescategorical89.2%
Total Medicaid and CHIP Determinations Processed Between 24 Hours and 7 Daysnumeric43.1%
Total Medicaid and CHIP Determinations Processed Between 24 Hours and 7 Days - footnotescategorical89.2%
Total Medicaid and CHIP Determinations Processed Between 8 Days and 30 Daysnumeric43.1%
Total Medicaid and CHIP Determinations Processed Between 8 Days and 30 Days - footnotescategorical89.3%
Total Medicaid and CHIP Determinations Processed between 31 days and 45 daysnumeric43.1%
Total Medicaid and CHIP Determinations Processed between 31 days and 45 days - footnotescategorical89.3%
Total Medicaid and CHIP Determinations Processed in More than 45 Daysnumeric43.1%
Total Medicaid and CHIP Determinations Processed in More than 45 Days - footnotescategorical89.3%
Total Call Center Volume (Number of Calls)numeric69.5%
Total Call Center Volume (Number of Calls) - footnotescategorical71.0%
Average Call Center Wait Time (Minutes)numeric69.5%
Average Call Center Wait Time (Minutes) - footnotescategorical69.7%
Average Call Center Abandonment Ratenumeric69.5%
Average Call Center Abandonment Rate - footnotescategorical69.7%
Fig 7.
Pearson correlation across numeric columns (sampled, bounded).
Show data table
Pearson correlation across 12 numeric columns (values clipped to 2 decimals).
Reporting PeriodNew Applications Submitted to Medicaid and CHIP AgenciesApplications for Financial Assistance Submitted to the State Based MarketplaceTotal Applications for Financial Assistance Submitted at State LevelIndividuals Determined Eligible for Medicaid at ApplicationIndividuals Determined Eligible for CHIP at ApplicationTotal Medicaid and CHIP DeterminationsMedicaid and CHIP Child EnrollmentTotal Medicaid and CHIP EnrollmentTotal Medicaid EnrollmentTotal CHIP EnrollmentTotal Adult Medicaid Enrollment
Reporting Period+1.00-0.03+0.09+0.06+0.07+0.05+0.07+0.11+0.11+0.11+0.07+0.06
New Applications Submitted to Medicaid and CHIP Agencies-0.03+1.00-0.07+0.49+0.60+0.62+0.61+0.70+0.59+0.62+0.52+0.37
Applications for Financial Assistance Submitted to the State Based Marketplace+0.09-0.07+1.00+0.83+0.25+0.11+0.24+0.24+0.27+0.30+0.29+0.08
Total Applications for Financial Assistance Submitted at State Level+0.06+0.49+0.83+1.00+0.55+0.44+0.54+0.60+0.56+0.61+0.54+0.27
Individuals Determined Eligible for Medicaid at Application+0.07+0.60+0.25+0.55+1.00+0.89+1.00+0.65+0.61+0.64+0.63+0.38
Individuals Determined Eligible for CHIP at Application+0.05+0.62+0.11+0.44+0.89+1.00+0.91+0.55+0.46+0.48+0.50+0.27
Total Medicaid and CHIP Determinations+0.07+0.61+0.24+0.54+1.00+0.91+1.00+0.65+0.60+0.63+0.62+0.38
Medicaid and CHIP Child Enrollment+0.11+0.70+0.24+0.60+0.65+0.55+0.65+1.00+0.94+0.96+0.92+0.61
Total Medicaid and CHIP Enrollment+0.11+0.59+0.27+0.56+0.61+0.46+0.60+0.94+1.00+0.98+0.95+0.68
Total Medicaid Enrollment+0.11+0.62+0.30+0.61+0.64+0.48+0.63+0.96+0.98+1.00+0.96+0.69
Total CHIP Enrollment+0.07+0.52+0.29+0.54+0.63+0.50+0.62+0.92+0.95+0.96+1.00+0.68
Total Adult Medicaid Enrollment+0.06+0.37+0.08+0.27+0.38+0.27+0.38+0.61+0.68+0.69+0.68+1.00

State Abbreviation categorical feature

Two-letter US state abbreviation, with 51 distinct values (the 50 states plus DC) covering all 10,302 rows without nulls. The distribution is perfectly uniform: every state appears exactly 202 times, and entropy_ratio is 1.0, indicating the dataset was constructed as a balanced panel across states rather than sampled from real-world population.

Treatment: One-hot or target-encode for modelling; can also serve as a join key to state-level reference tables.

anthropic:claude-opus-4-7 · confidence high
Out[13]:

saturn.columns["State Abbreviation"].stats

statvalue
n10,302
nulls0 (0.0%)
unique51
top_value AK
top_rate 0.01961
cardinality 51
entropy 5.672
entropy_ratio 1
Fig 8.
Top values for State Abbreviation.
Show data table
Top values for State Abbreviation (20 unique shown, of 51 total).
valuecountshare
AK2022.0%
AL2022.0%
AR2022.0%
AZ2022.0%
CA2022.0%
CO2022.0%
CT2022.0%
DC2022.0%
DE2022.0%
FL2022.0%
GA2022.0%
HI2022.0%
IA2022.0%
ID2022.0%
IL2022.0%
IN2022.0%
KS2022.0%
KY2022.0%
LA2022.0%
MA2022.0%

State Name categorical feature

This column lists US state names, with 51 unique values (the 50 states plus District of Columbia) and zero nulls across 10,302 rows. The distribution is perfectly uniform: every state appears exactly 202 times, yielding a top_rate of 0.0196 and entropy_ratio of 1.0. That balance suggests the dataset was constructed as a state-by-period grid rather than sampled from real-world activity.

Treatment: Use as a categorical grouping key; one-hot or target-encode for modelling.

anthropic:claude-opus-4-7 · confidence high
Out[16]:

saturn.columns["State Name"].stats

statvalue
n10,302
nulls0 (0.0%)
unique51
top_value Alaska
top_rate 0.01961
cardinality 51
entropy 5.672
entropy_ratio 1
Fig 9.
Top values for State Name.
Show data table
Top values for State Name (20 unique shown, of 51 total).
valuecountshare
Alaska2022.0%
Alabama2022.0%
Arkansas2022.0%
Arizona2022.0%
California2022.0%
Colorado2022.0%
Connecticut2022.0%
District of Columbia2022.0%
Delaware2022.0%
Florida2022.0%
Georgia2022.0%
Hawaii2022.0%
Iowa2022.0%
Idaho2022.0%
Illinois2022.0%
Indiana2022.0%
Kansas2022.0%
Kentucky2022.0%
Louisiana2022.0%
Massachusetts2022.0%

Reporting Period numeric timestamp

Values like 202510, 202107, 201309 in YYYYMM form indicate this is a reporting period encoded as an integer year-month, not a true numeric measure. The range spans 201309 to 202510 with 102 unique periods across 10,302 rows and no nulls, consistent with monthly snapshots over roughly a decade. Summary stats like mean 202112.5 and std 249.6 are arithmetic artefacts of the YYYYMM encoding and should not be interpreted as a distribution.

Treatment: parse YYYYMM into a proper date and treat as a temporal key, not a numeric feature.

anthropic:claude-opus-4-7 · confidence high
Out[19]:

saturn.columns["Reporting Period"].stats

statvalue
n10,302
nulls0 (0.0%)
unique102
min 201,309
max 202,510
mean 2.021e+05
median 2.021e+05
std 249.6
q1 201,906
q3 202,309
iqr 403
skew -0.1301
kurtosis -0.8155
n_outliers 0
outlier_rate 0
zero_rate 0
Fig 10.
Distribution of Reporting Period. Vertical dash marks the median.
Show data table
Histogram bins for Reporting Period (median: 202107.5).
bincount
2.013e+05 – 2.013e+0551
2.013e+05 – 2.014e+050
2.014e+05 – 2.014e+050
2.014e+05 – 2.014e+050
2.014e+05 – 2.015e+050
2.015e+05 – 2.015e+050
2.015e+05 – 2.015e+050
2.015e+05 – 2.015e+050
2.015e+05 – 2.016e+050
2.016e+05 – 2.016e+050
2.016e+05 – 2.016e+050
2.016e+05 – 2.017e+050
2.017e+05 – 2.017e+050
2.017e+05 – 2.017e+05714
2.017e+05 – 2.018e+050
2.018e+05 – 2.018e+050
2.018e+05 – 2.018e+051224
2.018e+05 – 2.018e+050
2.018e+05 – 2.019e+050
2.019e+05 – 2.019e+05918
2.019e+05 – 2.019e+05306
2.019e+05 – 2.02e+050
2.02e+05 – 2.02e+050
2.02e+05 – 2.02e+051224
2.02e+05 – 2.021e+050
2.021e+05 – 2.021e+050
2.021e+05 – 2.021e+051224
2.021e+05 – 2.021e+050
2.021e+05 – 2.022e+050
2.022e+05 – 2.022e+05918
2.022e+05 – 2.022e+05306
2.022e+05 – 2.023e+050
2.023e+05 – 2.023e+050
2.023e+05 – 2.023e+051224
2.023e+05 – 2.024e+050
2.024e+05 – 2.024e+050
2.024e+05 – 2.024e+051224
2.024e+05 – 2.024e+050
2.024e+05 – 2.025e+050
2.025e+05 – 2.025e+05969

State Expanded Medicaid categorical feature

Binary Y/N flag indicating whether the state expanded Medicaid, fully populated across all 10,302 rows. The distribution is moderately imbalanced, with 'Y' covering 72.6% (7,475) of rows versus 2,827 'N'. With only 2 categories and no nulls, this is a clean feature.

Treatment: Encode as a 0/1 binary indicator for modelling.

anthropic:claude-opus-4-7 · confidence high
Out[22]:

saturn.columns["State Expanded Medicaid"].stats

statvalue
n10,302
nulls0 (0.0%)
unique2
top_value Y
top_rate 0.7256
cardinality 2
entropy 0.8477
entropy_ratio 0.8477
Fig 11.
Top values for State Expanded Medicaid.
Show data table
Top values for State Expanded Medicaid (2 unique shown, of 2 total).
valuecountshare
Y747572.6%
N282727.4%

Preliminary or Updated categorical metadata

Binary flag distinguishing preliminary versus updated records, taking values 'P' and 'U'. The split is exactly even at 5151 each, yielding maximum entropy (1.0) and a top_rate of 0.5 — this perfect balance suggests every event appears once in each state rather than being a natural distribution.

Treatment: Use to filter to one revision state (likely 'U') before analysis to avoid double-counting.

anthropic:claude-opus-4-7 · confidence high
Out[25]:

saturn.columns["Preliminary or Updated"].stats

statvalue
n10,302
nulls0 (0.0%)
unique2
top_value U
top_rate 0.5
cardinality 2
entropy 1
entropy_ratio 1
Fig 12.
Top values for Preliminary or Updated.
Show data table
Top values for Preliminary or Updated (2 unique shown, of 2 total).
valuecountshare
U515150.0%
P515150.0%

Final Report categorical label

Binary Y/N flag indicating whether a final report exists, with exactly 10302 rows split evenly into 5151 Y and 5151 N. The perfect 50/50 balance (entropy 1.0, top_rate 0.5) is unusual for organic data and suggests deliberate sampling or stratification.

Treatment: Use directly as a binary target; encode Y/N to 1/0.

anthropic:claude-opus-4-7 · confidence high
Out[28]:

saturn.columns["Final Report"].stats

statvalue
n10,302
nulls0 (0.0%)
unique2
top_value Y
top_rate 0.5
cardinality 2
entropy 1
entropy_ratio 1
Fig 13.
Top values for Final Report.
Show data table
Top values for Final Report (2 unique shown, of 2 total).
valuecountshare
Y515150.0%
N515150.0%

New Applications Submitted to Medicaid and CHIP Agencies numeric feature

Counts of new Medicaid/CHIP applications submitted to state agencies, reported across 10,302 rows. The distribution is heavily right-skewed (skew 4.08, kurtosis 23.5) with a median of 14,644 but a max of 733,651, and 11.5% of values flagged as outliers. About 4% of rows are zero and 0.5% are null, suggesting either non-reporting periods or genuinely inactive agencies.

Treatment: log1p-transform before modelling to tame the heavy right tail.

anthropic:claude-opus-4-7 · confidence high
Out[31]:

saturn.columns["New Applications Submitted to Medicaid and CHIP Agencies"].stats

statvalue
n10,302
nulls51 (0.5%)
unique5,378
min 0
max 733,651
mean 2.99e+04
median 14,644
std 4.911e+04
q1 4508
q3 29,970
iqr 2.546e+04
skew 4.077
kurtosis 23.55
n_outliers 1,175
outlier_rate 0.1146
zero_rate 0.04019
alert: high_skewskew=+4.08
alert: outliers11.5% rows beyond 1.5 IQR
Fig 14.
Distribution of New Applications Submitted to Medicaid and CHIP Agencies. Vertical dash marks the median.
Show data table
Histogram bins for New Applications Submitted to Medicaid and CHIP Agencies (median: 14644.0).
bincount
0 – 1.834e+045923
1.834e+04 – 3.668e+042165
3.668e+04 – 5.502e+04640
5.502e+04 – 7.337e+04475
7.337e+04 – 9.171e+04348
9.171e+04 – 1.1e+05193
1.1e+05 – 1.284e+05106
1.284e+05 – 1.467e+0596
1.467e+05 – 1.651e+0550
1.651e+05 – 1.834e+0534
1.834e+05 – 2.018e+054
2.018e+05 – 2.201e+056
2.201e+05 – 2.384e+0520
2.384e+05 – 2.568e+0529
2.568e+05 – 2.751e+0550
2.751e+05 – 2.935e+0534
2.935e+05 – 3.118e+0518
3.118e+05 – 3.301e+0530
3.301e+05 – 3.485e+0516
3.485e+05 – 3.668e+056
3.668e+05 – 3.852e+052
3.852e+05 – 4.035e+054
4.035e+05 – 4.218e+050
4.218e+05 – 4.402e+050
4.402e+05 – 4.585e+050
4.585e+05 – 4.769e+050
4.769e+05 – 4.952e+050
4.952e+05 – 5.136e+050
5.136e+05 – 5.319e+050
5.319e+05 – 5.502e+050
5.502e+05 – 5.686e+050
5.686e+05 – 5.869e+050
5.869e+05 – 6.053e+050
6.053e+05 – 6.236e+050
6.236e+05 – 6.419e+050
6.419e+05 – 6.603e+050
6.603e+05 – 6.786e+050
6.786e+05 – 6.97e+050
6.97e+05 – 7.153e+050
7.153e+05 – 7.337e+052

New Applications Submitted to Medicaid and CHIP Agencies - footnotes categorical metadata

This is a footnote/qualifier column annotating the 'New Applications Submitted to Medicaid and CHIP Agencies' metric, explaining caveats like inclusion of renewals, administrative data transfers, or excluded application types. It is sparse with a 76.6% null rate, leaving only 18 distinct footnote strings across 10,302 rows; the most common, 'Includes Renewals and/or Redeterminations', covers 27% of non-null entries. Entropy ratio of 0.84 across just 18 categories indicates the present footnotes are spread fairly evenly, and several values are concatenations of multiple caveats separated by semicolons.

Treatment: Treat as qualifier metadata: split semicolon-separated flags into binary indicators and use to caveat or filter the main metric rather than as a feature.

anthropic:claude-opus-4-7 · confidence high
Out[34]:

saturn.columns["New Applications Submitted to Medicaid and CHIP Agencies - footnotes"].stats

statvalue
n10,302
nulls7,891 (76.6%)
unique18
top_value Includes Renewals and/or Redeterminations
top_rate 0.27
cardinality 18
entropy 3.502
entropy_ratio 0.8399
alert: null_rate76.6% null
Fig 15.
Top values for New Applications Submitted to Medicaid and CHIP Agencies - footnotes.
Show data table
Top values for New Applications Submitted to Medicaid and CHIP Agencies - footnotes (18 unique shown, of 18 total).
valuecountshare
Includes Renewals and/or Redeterminations6516.3%
Does Not Include All Non-MAGI Applications Submitted to Medicaid and CHIP Agencies2452.4%
Includes Renewals and/or Redeterminations; Includes Administrative Data Transfers1971.9%
Includes Applications for Other Programs (e.g, QHPs, SNAP, etc.)1931.9%
Includes Applications for Other Programs (e.g, QHPs, SNAP, etc.); Includes Accounts Transferred from FFM1921.9%
Does Not Include All Applications for Limited-Benefit Programs Submitted to Medicaid and CHIP Agencies1901.8%
Includes Administrative Data Transfers; Does Not Include All Medicaid Applications Submitted to Medicaid and CHIP Agencies1611.6%
Does Not Include All Medicaid Applications Submitted to Medicaid and CHIP Agencies1121.1%
Includes SBM data991.0%
Includes Accounts Transferred from FFM; Does Not Include All Applications for Limited-Benefit Programs Submitted to Medicaid and CHIP Agencies970.9%
Includes Accounts Transferred from FFM; Does Not Include All Medicaid Applications Submitted to Medicaid and CHIP Agencies; Does Not Include All CHIP Applications Submitted to Medicaid and CHIP Agencies; Includes Administrative Data Transfers910.9%
Includes Administrative Data Transfers; Includes Accounts Transferred from FFM; Does Not Include All Medicaid Applications Submitted to Medicaid and CHIP Agencies; Does Not Include All CHIP Applications Submitted to Medicaid and CHIP Agencies670.7%
Does Not Include All Medicaid Applications Submitted to Medicaid and CHIP Agencies; Includes Administrative Data Transfers340.3%
Includes Duplicates260.3%
Count is of individuals as opposed to applications210.2%
Does Not Include All Medicaid Applications Submitted to Medicaid and CHIP Agencies; Includes Duplicates190.2%
Includes Accounts Transferred from FFM80.1%
Includes Administrative Data Transfers; Includes Accounts Transferred from FFM80.1%

Applications for Financial Assistance Submitted to the State Based Marketplace numeric feature

This column appears to count applications for financial assistance submitted to a State Based Marketplace, recorded as a numeric tally per row. The distribution is dominated by zeros (zero_rate 0.77, median 0, IQR 0), yet the mean is 11228.57 and the max reaches 762069.0, producing extreme skew (8.41) and kurtosis (82.64). Roughly 23% of rows (2357) flag as outliers, so the non-zero tail carries nearly all the signal.

Treatment: Log1p-transform and consider a zero-vs-nonzero indicator before modelling.

anthropic:claude-opus-4-7 · confidence high
Out[37]:

saturn.columns["Applications for Financial Assistance Submitted to the State Based Marketplace"].stats

statvalue
n10,302
nulls51 (0.5%)
unique1,373
min 0
max 762,069
mean 1.123e+04
median 0
std 5.539e+04
q1 0
q3 0
iqr 0
skew 8.415
kurtosis 82.64
n_outliers 2,357
outlier_rate 0.2299
zero_rate 0.7701
alert: high_skewskew=+8.41
alert: outliers23.0% rows beyond 1.5 IQR
Fig 16.
Distribution of Applications for Financial Assistance Submitted to the State Based Marketplace. Vertical dash marks the median.
Show data table
Histogram bins for Applications for Financial Assistance Submitted to the State Based Marketplace (median: 0.0).
bincount
0 – 1.905e+049479
1.905e+04 – 3.81e+04115
3.81e+04 – 5.716e+0457
5.716e+04 – 7.621e+04139
7.621e+04 – 9.526e+04141
9.526e+04 – 1.143e+0573
1.143e+05 – 1.334e+0577
1.334e+05 – 1.524e+0525
1.524e+05 – 1.715e+0514
1.715e+05 – 1.905e+0512
1.905e+05 – 2.096e+054
2.096e+05 – 2.286e+052
2.286e+05 – 2.477e+052
2.477e+05 – 2.667e+050
2.667e+05 – 2.858e+056
2.858e+05 – 3.048e+056
3.048e+05 – 3.239e+058
3.239e+05 – 3.429e+054
3.429e+05 – 3.62e+058
3.62e+05 – 3.81e+0510
3.81e+05 – 4.001e+054
4.001e+05 – 4.191e+054
4.191e+05 – 4.382e+054
4.382e+05 – 4.572e+050
4.572e+05 – 4.763e+050
4.763e+05 – 4.953e+050
4.953e+05 – 5.144e+0510
5.144e+05 – 5.334e+056
5.334e+05 – 5.525e+057
5.525e+05 – 5.716e+054
5.716e+05 – 5.906e+052
5.906e+05 – 6.097e+056
6.097e+05 – 6.287e+054
6.287e+05 – 6.478e+054
6.478e+05 – 6.668e+054
6.668e+05 – 6.859e+050
6.859e+05 – 7.049e+052
7.049e+05 – 7.24e+052
7.24e+05 – 7.43e+054
7.43e+05 – 7.621e+052

Applications for Financial Assistance Submitted to the State Based Marketplace - footnotes categorical metadata

This is a footnotes/qualifier column annotating SBM application counts, with only 3 distinct caveat strings observed. It is 97.43% null, and among the 265 populated rows, 83.0% carry the single note "Includes Renewals and/or Redeterminations". The other two values layer on duplicates and Medicaid-coverage caveats that materially affect comparability of the underlying counts.

Treatment: Keep as a data-quality flag joined to the metric; do not model directly.

anthropic:claude-opus-4-7 · confidence high
Out[40]:

saturn.columns["Applications for Financial Assistance Submitted to the State Based Marketplace - footnotes"].stats

statvalue
n10,302
nulls10,037 (97.4%)
unique3
top_value Includes Renewals and/or Redeterminations
top_rate 0.8302
cardinality 3
entropy 0.8241
entropy_ratio 0.52
alert: null_rate97.4% null
Fig 17.
Top values for Applications for Financial Assistance Submitted to the State Based Marketplace - footnotes.
Show data table
Top values for Applications for Financial Assistance Submitted to the State Based Marketplace - footnotes (3 unique shown, of 3 total).
valuecountshare
Includes Renewals and/or Redeterminations2202.1%
Includes Duplicates; Includes Renewals and/or Redeterminations260.3%
Does Not Include All Medicaid Applications Received By the SBM; Includes Duplicates; Includes Renewals and/or Redeterminations190.2%

Total Applications for Financial Assistance Submitted at State Level numeric feature

This is a numeric count of financial-assistance applications submitted at the state level, with 10,302 records and 5,591 unique values. The distribution is heavily right-skewed (skew 4.40, kurtosis 26.40): the median is 18,257 but the mean is 41,125 and the max reaches 762,069, with 12.2% of rows flagged as outliers. About 2% of values are zero and only 0.5% are null.

Treatment: Log-transform (log1p) before modelling to tame the heavy right skew and outliers.

anthropic:claude-opus-4-7 · confidence high
Out[43]:

saturn.columns["Total Applications for Financial Assistance Submitted at State Level"].stats

statvalue
n10,302
nulls51 (0.5%)
unique5,591
min 0
max 762,069
mean 4.113e+04
median 18,257
std 7.208e+04
q1 6,490
q3 40,107
iqr 33,617
skew 4.396
kurtosis 26.4
n_outliers 1,249
outlier_rate 0.1218
zero_rate 0.02039
alert: high_skewskew=+4.40
alert: outliers12.2% rows beyond 1.5 IQR
Fig 18.
Distribution of Total Applications for Financial Assistance Submitted at State Level. Vertical dash marks the median.
Show data table
Histogram bins for Total Applications for Financial Assistance Submitted at State Level (median: 18257.0).
bincount
0 – 1.905e+045336
1.905e+04 – 3.81e+042304
3.81e+04 – 5.716e+04717
5.716e+04 – 7.621e+04403
7.621e+04 – 9.526e+04332
9.526e+04 – 1.143e+05257
1.143e+05 – 1.334e+05204
1.334e+05 – 1.524e+05139
1.524e+05 – 1.715e+05112
1.715e+05 – 1.905e+0554
1.905e+05 – 2.096e+0537
2.096e+05 – 2.286e+0528
2.286e+05 – 2.477e+0520
2.477e+05 – 2.667e+0551
2.667e+05 – 2.858e+0560
2.858e+05 – 3.048e+0530
3.048e+05 – 3.239e+0536
3.239e+05 – 3.429e+0528
3.429e+05 – 3.62e+0512
3.62e+05 – 3.81e+0516
3.81e+05 – 4.001e+058
4.001e+05 – 4.191e+054
4.191e+05 – 4.382e+054
4.382e+05 – 4.572e+050
4.572e+05 – 4.763e+050
4.763e+05 – 4.953e+050
4.953e+05 – 5.144e+0510
5.144e+05 – 5.334e+056
5.334e+05 – 5.525e+057
5.525e+05 – 5.716e+054
5.716e+05 – 5.906e+052
5.906e+05 – 6.097e+056
6.097e+05 – 6.287e+054
6.287e+05 – 6.478e+054
6.478e+05 – 6.668e+054
6.668e+05 – 6.859e+050
6.859e+05 – 7.049e+052
7.049e+05 – 7.24e+052
7.24e+05 – 7.43e+056
7.43e+05 – 7.621e+052

Total Applications for Financial Assistance Submitted at State Level - footnotes categorical metadata

Free-form footnote annotations qualifying state-level financial assistance application counts, drawn from a small controlled vocabulary of 17 caveat strings (often concatenated with semicolons). 73.44% of rows are null, and among the 2,737 populated rows the single value "Includes Renewals and/or Redeterminations" covers 42.5% (1,163 rows), indicating these are methodology caveats rather than data values. Entropy ratio of 0.73 shows the non-null distribution is moderately spread across the 17 caveat combinations.

Treatment: Keep as a qualifier for interpreting the paired count column; split on ';' into caveat flags rather than modelling as a single category.

anthropic:claude-opus-4-7 · confidence high
Out[46]:

saturn.columns["Total Applications for Financial Assistance Submitted at State Level - footnotes"].stats

statvalue
n10,302
nulls7,566 (73.4%)
unique17
top_value Includes Renewals and/or Redeterminations
top_rate 0.4251
cardinality 17
entropy 2.977
entropy_ratio 0.7283
alert: null_rate73.4% null
Fig 19.
Top values for Total Applications for Financial Assistance Submitted at State Level - footnotes.
Show data table
Top values for Total Applications for Financial Assistance Submitted at State Level - footnotes (17 unique shown, of 17 total).
valuecountshare
Includes Renewals and/or Redeterminations116311.3%
Does Not Include All Non-MAGI Applications2452.4%
Includes Renewals and/or Redeterminations; Includes Administrative Data Transfers1971.9%
Includes Applications for Other Programs (e.g, QHPs, SNAP, etc.)1931.9%
Includes Applications for Other Programs (e.g, QHPs, SNAP, etc.); Includes Accounts Transferred from FFM1921.9%
Does Not Include All Applications for Limited-Benefit Programs1901.8%
Includes Administrative Data Transfers; Does Not Include All Medicaid Applications; Does Not Include All CHIP Applications1611.6%
Includes Accounts Transferred from FFM; Does Not Include All Applications for Limited-Benefit Programs970.9%
Includes Accounts Transferred from FFM; Does Not Include All Medicaid Applications; Does Not Include All CHIP Applications; Includes Administrative Data Transfers910.9%
Includes Administrative Data Transfers; Includes Accounts Transferred from FFM; Does Not Include All Medicaid Applications; Does Not Include All CHIP Applications670.7%
Does Not Include All Medicaid Applications; Does Not Include All CHIP Applications; Includes Administrative Data Transfers340.3%
Includes Duplicates260.3%
Does Not Include All Medicaid Applications240.2%
Count is of individuals as opposed to applications210.2%
Does Not Include All Medicaid Applications; Includes Duplicates190.2%
Includes Accounts Transferred from FFM80.1%
Includes Administrative Data Transfers; Includes Accounts Transferred from FFM80.1%

Individuals Determined Eligible for Medicaid at Application numeric feature

This is a numeric count of individuals deemed Medicaid-eligible at application, likely aggregated by some reporting unit (state, month, or office) given 10,302 rows and 5,568 unique values. The distribution is heavily right-skewed (skew 2.93, kurtosis 11.06): the median is 11,008 but the mean is 27,437 and the max reaches 435,560, with 10.25% of rows flagged as outliers. About 5.86% of values are zero and 0.5% are null, so empty reporting periods are present but rare.

Treatment: Log-transform (or log1p, since zeros exist) before any regression or distance-based modelling.

anthropic:claude-opus-4-7 · confidence high
Out[49]:

saturn.columns["Individuals Determined Eligible for Medicaid at Application"].stats

statvalue
n10,302
nulls51 (0.5%)
unique5,568
min 0
max 435,560
mean 2.744e+04
median 11,008
std 4.159e+04
q1 4,344
q3 32,631
iqr 28,287
skew 2.932
kurtosis 11.06
n_outliers 1,051
outlier_rate 0.1025
zero_rate 0.05863
alert: high_skewskew=+2.93
alert: outliers10.3% rows beyond 1.5 IQR
Fig 20.
Distribution of Individuals Determined Eligible for Medicaid at Application. Vertical dash marks the median.
Show data table
Histogram bins for Individuals Determined Eligible for Medicaid at Application (median: 11008.0).
bincount
0 – 1.089e+045085
1.089e+04 – 2.178e+041748
2.178e+04 – 3.267e+04862
3.267e+04 – 4.356e+04850
4.356e+04 – 5.444e+04382
5.444e+04 – 6.533e+04138
6.533e+04 – 7.622e+04144
7.622e+04 – 8.711e+04146
8.711e+04 – 9.8e+04136
9.8e+04 – 1.089e+05135
1.089e+05 – 1.198e+05107
1.198e+05 – 1.307e+0572
1.307e+05 – 1.416e+0554
1.416e+05 – 1.524e+0577
1.524e+05 – 1.633e+0562
1.633e+05 – 1.742e+0574
1.742e+05 – 1.851e+0549
1.851e+05 – 1.96e+0540
1.96e+05 – 2.069e+0516
2.069e+05 – 2.178e+0527
2.178e+05 – 2.287e+057
2.287e+05 – 2.396e+0511
2.396e+05 – 2.504e+056
2.504e+05 – 2.613e+056
2.613e+05 – 2.722e+053
2.722e+05 – 2.831e+054
2.831e+05 – 2.94e+050
2.94e+05 – 3.049e+052
3.049e+05 – 3.158e+050
3.158e+05 – 3.267e+050
3.267e+05 – 3.376e+051
3.376e+05 – 3.484e+053
3.484e+05 – 3.593e+050
3.593e+05 – 3.702e+050
3.702e+05 – 3.811e+050
3.811e+05 – 3.92e+050
3.92e+05 – 4.029e+050
4.029e+05 – 4.138e+050
4.138e+05 – 4.247e+052
4.247e+05 – 4.356e+052

Individuals Determined Eligible for Medicaid at Application - footnotes categorical metadata

Footnote/caveat column annotating the Medicaid eligibility count, with 18 distinct semicolon-joined qualifier strings such as 'Includes Renewals and/or Redeterminations' (28.1% of non-nulls) and 'Does Not Include All Medicaid Determinations Made At Application'. 72.8% of rows are null, triggering the null_rate alert, meaning most reporters submitted no caveat. Entropy ratio of 0.82 across only 18 categories shows the qualifiers are spread fairly evenly rather than dominated by one note, and several values are compound flags that would need splitting to analyze cleanly.

Treatment: Split on '; ' into binary caveat flags and use to qualify or filter the paired count column; do not model directly.

anthropic:claude-opus-4-7 · confidence high
Out[52]:

saturn.columns["Individuals Determined Eligible for Medicaid at Application - footnotes"].stats

statvalue
n10,302
nulls7,500 (72.8%)
unique18
top_value Includes Renewals and/or Redeterminations
top_rate 0.2812
cardinality 18
entropy 3.41
entropy_ratio 0.8178
alert: null_rate72.8% null
Fig 21.
Top values for Individuals Determined Eligible for Medicaid at Application - footnotes.
Show data table
Top values for Individuals Determined Eligible for Medicaid at Application - footnotes (18 unique shown, of 18 total).
valuecountshare
Includes Renewals and/or Redeterminations7887.6%
Does Not Include All Medicaid Determinations Made At Application3863.7%
Includes Renewals and/or Redeterminations; Includes CHIP2602.5%
Includes Renewals and/or Redeterminations; Does Not Include All Medicaid Determinations Made At Application2162.1%
Count is of Households, Not Individuals2032.0%
Includes CHIP1921.9%
Includes Renewals and/or Redeterminations; Does Not Include All MAGI Determinations Made At Application1801.7%
Includes CHIP; Includes Renewals and/or Redeterminations1021.0%
Does Not Include All Determinations for Limited-Benefit Programs Made At Application970.9%
Count is of Households, Not Individuals; Includes Renewals and/or Redeterminations830.8%
Includes CHIP; Count is of Households, Not Individuals; Includes Renewals and/or Redeterminations770.7%
Count is of Households, Not Individuals; Does Not Include All Non-MAGI Determinations Made At Application740.7%
Count is of Households, Not Individuals; Includes Renewals and/or Redeterminations; Includes CHIP670.7%
Includes Renewals and/or Redeterminations; Count is of Households, Not Individuals250.2%
Includes Conditional Eligibility Determinations; Includes Presumptive Eligibility Determinations; Does Not Include All CHIP Determinations Made At Application210.2%
Includes Final Eligibility Determinations Made by FFM; Includes Conditional Eligibility Determinations; Includes Presumptive Eligibility Determinations150.1%
Does Not Include All MAGI Determinations Made At Application; Includes Renewals and/or Redeterminations90.1%
Does Not Include All Non-MAGI Determinations Made At Application70.1%

Individuals Determined Eligible for CHIP at Application numeric

Out[55]:

saturn.columns["Individuals Determined Eligible for CHIP at Application"].stats

statvalue
n10,302
nulls51 (0.5%)
unique3,064
min 0
max 44,881
mean 2375
median 679
std 4296
q1 142
q3 2,418
iqr 2,276
skew 3.31
kurtosis 13.83
n_outliers 1,295
outlier_rate 0.1263
zero_rate 0.1137
alert: high_skewskew=+3.31
alert: outliers12.6% rows beyond 1.5 IQR
Fig 22.
Distribution of Individuals Determined Eligible for CHIP at Application. Vertical dash marks the median.
Show data table
Histogram bins for Individuals Determined Eligible for CHIP at Application (median: 679.0).
bincount
0 – 11226282
1122 – 22441289
2244 – 3366774
3366 – 4488376
4488 – 5610207
5610 – 6732198
6732 – 7854187
7854 – 8976159
8976 – 1.01e+04171
1.01e+04 – 1.122e+0483
1.122e+04 – 1.234e+0494
1.234e+04 – 1.346e+0480
1.346e+04 – 1.459e+0463
1.459e+04 – 1.571e+0442
1.571e+04 – 1.683e+0425
1.683e+04 – 1.795e+0436
1.795e+04 – 1.907e+0422
1.907e+04 – 2.02e+0420
2.02e+04 – 2.132e+0426
2.132e+04 – 2.244e+0433
2.244e+04 – 2.356e+0419
2.356e+04 – 2.468e+0419
2.468e+04 – 2.581e+048
2.581e+04 – 2.693e+048
2.693e+04 – 2.805e+042
2.805e+04 – 2.917e+043
2.917e+04 – 3.029e+043
3.029e+04 – 3.142e+042
3.142e+04 – 3.254e+048
3.254e+04 – 3.366e+046
3.366e+04 – 3.478e+044
3.478e+04 – 3.59e+040
3.59e+04 – 3.703e+040
3.703e+04 – 3.815e+040
3.815e+04 – 3.927e+040
3.927e+04 – 4.039e+040
4.039e+04 – 4.151e+040
4.151e+04 – 4.264e+040
4.264e+04 – 4.376e+040
4.376e+04 – 4.488e+042

Individuals Determined Eligible for CHIP at Application - footnotes categorical metadata

Free-text footnote annotations qualifying CHIP eligibility counts, populated only when a state needs to caveat its figures. The column is 90.99% null and only 7 distinct notes appear across 10,302 rows, with 'Includes Renewals and/or Redeterminations' covering 46.55% of the non-null cases. These caveats materially change comparability — some rows count households not individuals, others include presumptive or conditional determinations.

Treatment: Retain as a caveat flag joined to the eligibility count column; do not use as a modelling feature.

anthropic:claude-opus-4-7 · confidence high
Out[58]:

saturn.columns["Individuals Determined Eligible for CHIP at Application - footnotes"].stats

statvalue
n10,302
nulls9,374 (91.0%)
unique7
top_value Includes Renewals and/or Redeterminations
top_rate 0.4655
cardinality 7
entropy 1.939
entropy_ratio 0.6905
alert: null_rate91.0% null
Fig 23.
Top values for Individuals Determined Eligible for CHIP at Application - footnotes.
Show data table
Top values for Individuals Determined Eligible for CHIP at Application - footnotes (7 unique shown, of 7 total).
valuecountshare
Includes Renewals and/or Redeterminations4324.2%
Includes Renewals and/or Redeterminations; Does Not Include All CHIP Determinations Made At Application2162.1%
Does Not Include All CHIP Determinations Made At Application2001.9%
Count is of Households, Not Individuals370.4%
Includes Conditional Eligibility Determinations; Includes Presumptive Eligibility Determinations; Does Not Include All CHIP Determinations Made At Application210.2%
Includes Final Eligibility Determinations Made by FFM; Includes Conditional Eligibility Determinations; Includes Presumptive Eligibility Determinations150.1%
Count is of Households, Not Individuals; Includes Renewals and/or Redeterminations70.1%

Total Medicaid and CHIP Determinations numeric feature

Numeric counts of total Medicaid and CHIP determinations per record, likely a state-month or state-period rollup. The distribution is heavily right-skewed (skew 2.92, kurtosis 10.77) with a median of 11,977 sitting far below the mean of 29,811 and a max of 467,780, and 10.5% of values flagged as outliers. About 5.5% of rows are zeros and 0.5% are null, which is worth checking against reporting periods or non-reporting states.

Treatment: Log-transform (after handling zeros) before any regression or distance-based modelling.

anthropic:claude-opus-4-7 · confidence high
Out[61]:

saturn.columns["Total Medicaid and CHIP Determinations"].stats

statvalue
n10,302
nulls51 (0.5%)
unique5,587
min 0
max 467,780
mean 2.981e+04
median 11,977
std 4.535e+04
q1 4738
q3 35,059
iqr 3.032e+04
skew 2.922
kurtosis 10.77
n_outliers 1,076
outlier_rate 0.105
zero_rate 0.05492
alert: high_skewskew=+2.92
alert: outliers10.5% rows beyond 1.5 IQR
Fig 24.
Distribution of Total Medicaid and CHIP Determinations. Vertical dash marks the median.
Show data table
Histogram bins for Total Medicaid and CHIP Determinations (median: 11977.0).
bincount
0 – 1.169e+045036
1.169e+04 – 2.339e+041757
2.339e+04 – 3.508e+04896
3.508e+04 – 4.678e+04844
4.678e+04 – 5.847e+04386
5.847e+04 – 7.017e+04137
7.017e+04 – 8.186e+04137
8.186e+04 – 9.356e+04131
9.356e+04 – 1.053e+05147
1.053e+05 – 1.169e+05149
1.169e+05 – 1.286e+05120
1.286e+05 – 1.403e+0560
1.403e+05 – 1.52e+0552
1.52e+05 – 1.637e+0565
1.637e+05 – 1.754e+0564
1.754e+05 – 1.871e+0564
1.871e+05 – 1.988e+0551
1.988e+05 – 2.105e+0543
2.105e+05 – 2.222e+0526
2.222e+05 – 2.339e+0533
2.339e+05 – 2.456e+0511
2.456e+05 – 2.573e+059
2.573e+05 – 2.69e+0511
2.69e+05 – 2.807e+054
2.807e+05 – 2.924e+052
2.924e+05 – 3.041e+056
3.041e+05 – 3.158e+050
3.158e+05 – 3.274e+052
3.274e+05 – 3.391e+050
3.391e+05 – 3.508e+050
3.508e+05 – 3.625e+054
3.625e+05 – 3.742e+050
3.742e+05 – 3.859e+050
3.859e+05 – 3.976e+050
3.976e+05 – 4.093e+050
4.093e+05 – 4.21e+050
4.21e+05 – 4.327e+050
4.327e+05 – 4.444e+051
4.444e+05 – 4.561e+051
4.561e+05 – 4.678e+052

Total Medicaid and CHIP Determinations - footnotes categorical metadata

Free-text footnote field qualifying the Medicaid/CHIP determinations metric, with 12 distinct semicolon-delimited caveat strings drawn from a small controlled vocabulary. 81.58% of rows are null, and among the 18% populated, 47.10% carry the single caveat 'Includes Renewals and/or Redeterminations'. Most other values are compound caveats concatenated with semicolons, signalling these are flags about how each state reported the count rather than analytic content.

Treatment: Split on '; ' into boolean caveat flags and use to qualify or filter the paired determinations metric.

anthropic:claude-opus-4-7 · confidence high
Out[64]:

saturn.columns["Total Medicaid and CHIP Determinations - footnotes"].stats

statvalue
n10,302
nulls8,404 (81.6%)
unique12
top_value Includes Renewals and/or Redeterminations
top_rate 0.471
cardinality 12
entropy 2.42
entropy_ratio 0.675
alert: null_rate81.6% null
Fig 25.
Top values for Total Medicaid and CHIP Determinations - footnotes.
Show data table
Top values for Total Medicaid and CHIP Determinations - footnotes (12 unique shown, of 12 total).
valuecountshare
Includes Renewals and/or Redeterminations8948.7%
Does Not Include All Medicaid Determinations Made At Application; Does Not Include All CHIP Determinations Made At Application3343.2%
Includes Renewals and/or Redeterminations; Does Not Include All Medicaid Determinations Made At Application; Does Not Include All CHIP Determinations Made At Application2162.1%
Count is of Households, Not Individuals; Includes Renewals and/or Redeterminations1511.5%
Does Not Include All Determinations for Limited-Benefit Programs Made At Application970.9%
Does Not Include All Non-MAGI Determinations Made At Application810.8%
Does Not Include All Medicaid Determinations Made At Application490.5%
Includes Renewals and/or Redeterminations; Count is of Households, Not Individuals250.2%
Includes Conditional Eligibility Determinations; Includes Presumptive Eligibility Determinations; Does Not Include All CHIP Determinations Made At Application210.2%
Includes Final Eligibility Determinations Made by FFM; Includes Conditional Eligibility Determinations; Includes Presumptive Eligibility Determinations150.1%
Count is of Households, Not Individuals120.1%
Does Not Include All Non-MAGI Determinations Made At Application; Does Not Include All Medicaid Determinations Made At Application; Does Not Include All CHIP Determinations Made At Application30.0%

Medicaid and CHIP Child Enrollment numeric feature

This column reports Medicaid and CHIP child enrollment counts, ranging from 0 to 5,339,904 with a mean of 740,683 and median of 511,370. The distribution is severely right-skewed (skew 2.80, kurtosis 8.85) with 804 outliers (7.84%) and a 2.13% zero rate, consistent with a few large states dominating while smaller jurisdictions cluster low. Null rate is negligible (0.5%).

Treatment: log-transform before regression to tame the heavy right tail.

anthropic:claude-opus-4-7 · confidence high
Out[67]:

saturn.columns["Medicaid and CHIP Child Enrollment"].stats

statvalue
n10,302
nulls51 (0.5%)
unique8,094
min 0
max 5.34e+06
mean 7.407e+05
median 511,370
std 9.294e+05
q1 156,319
q3 836,511
iqr 680,192
skew 2.799
kurtosis 8.851
n_outliers 804
outlier_rate 0.07843
zero_rate 0.02127
alert: high_skewskew=+2.80
alert: outliers7.8% rows beyond 1.5 IQR
Fig 26.
Distribution of Medicaid and CHIP Child Enrollment. Vertical dash marks the median.
Show data table
Histogram bins for Medicaid and CHIP Child Enrollment (median: 511370.0).
bincount
0 – 1.335e+052347
1.335e+05 – 2.67e+051120
2.67e+05 – 4.005e+051049
4.005e+05 – 5.34e+05815
5.34e+05 – 6.675e+051121
6.675e+05 – 8.01e+05986
8.01e+05 – 9.345e+05783
9.345e+05 – 1.068e+06174
1.068e+06 – 1.201e+0694
1.201e+06 – 1.335e+06316
1.335e+06 – 1.468e+06404
1.468e+06 – 1.602e+06196
1.602e+06 – 1.735e+0631
1.735e+06 – 1.869e+0611
1.869e+06 – 2.002e+060
2.002e+06 – 2.136e+060
2.136e+06 – 2.269e+060
2.269e+06 – 2.403e+0622
2.403e+06 – 2.536e+06217
2.536e+06 – 2.67e+0695
2.67e+06 – 2.803e+0620
2.803e+06 – 2.937e+0624
2.937e+06 – 3.07e+0620
3.07e+06 – 3.204e+0616
3.204e+06 – 3.337e+0655
3.337e+06 – 3.471e+0628
3.471e+06 – 3.604e+0630
3.604e+06 – 3.738e+066
3.738e+06 – 3.871e+0612
3.871e+06 – 4.005e+0620
4.005e+06 – 4.138e+0616
4.138e+06 – 4.272e+066
4.272e+06 – 4.405e+0616
4.405e+06 – 4.539e+060
4.539e+06 – 4.672e+060
4.672e+06 – 4.806e+068
4.806e+06 – 4.939e+0640
4.939e+06 – 5.073e+0662
5.073e+06 – 5.206e+0658
5.206e+06 – 5.34e+0633

Medicaid and CHIP Child Enrollment - footnotes categorical metadata

This is a footnotes/caveat column annotating Medicaid and CHIP child enrollment figures, with only 7 distinct values across 10,302 rows. It is overwhelmingly null (92.19%), and among the populated rows nearly half (49.57%) carry the same caveat about counting individuals enrolled at any time in the month rather than a point-in-time. The second most common note flags states 'Unable to provide data due to system limitations' (218 rows), which is a meaningful data-quality signal worth surfacing alongside any enrollment analysis.

Treatment: Keep as a qualitative flag joined to enrollment rows; do not model directly.

anthropic:claude-opus-4-7 · confidence high
Out[70]:

saturn.columns["Medicaid and CHIP Child Enrollment - footnotes"].stats

statvalue
n10,302
nulls9,497 (92.2%)
unique7
top_value Includes Individuals Enrolled At Any Time in Month (Not a Point-in-Time Count)
top_rate 0.4957
cardinality 7
entropy 1.854
entropy_ratio 0.6605
alert: null_rate92.2% null
Fig 27.
Top values for Medicaid and CHIP Child Enrollment - footnotes.
Show data table
Top values for Medicaid and CHIP Child Enrollment - footnotes (7 unique shown, of 7 total).
valuecountshare
Includes Individuals Enrolled At Any Time in Month (Not a Point-in-Time Count)3993.9%
Unable to provide data due to system limitations2182.1%
Includes Retroactive Enrollments1201.2%
Does Not Include All Full-Benefit Child Medicaid enrollees420.4%
Does Not Include All Full-Benefit MAGI Child enrollees110.1%
Includes Individuals Enrolled At Any Time in Month (Not a Point-in-Time Count); Includes Retroactive Enrollments80.1%
Does Not Include All Full-Benefit Child Medicaid enrollees; Does Not Include All CHIP enrollees70.1%

Total Medicaid and CHIP Enrollment numeric feature

State- or region-level Medicaid and CHIP enrollment counts, with a median of 1,031,822 and a max of 14,462,560 stretching the distribution well past the mean of 1,567,204. Skew of 3.67 and kurtosis of 16.57 confirm a long right tail, and 692 rows (6.7%) flag as outliers — consistent with a few very large states dominating. Near-zero null and zero rates mean the column is essentially fully populated.

Treatment: log-transform before regression to tame the heavy right tail.

anthropic:claude-opus-4-7 · confidence high
Out[73]:

saturn.columns["Total Medicaid and CHIP Enrollment"].stats

statvalue
n10,302
nulls2 (0.0%)
unique8,309
min 0
max 1.446e+07
mean 1.567e+06
median 1.032e+06
std 2.054e+06
q1 349,321
q3 1.805e+06
iqr 1.456e+06
skew 3.67
kurtosis 16.57
n_outliers 692
outlier_rate 0.06718
zero_rate 0.0002913
alert: high_skewskew=+3.67
alert: outliers6.7% rows beyond 1.5 IQR
Fig 28.
Distribution of Total Medicaid and CHIP Enrollment. Vertical dash marks the median.
Show data table
Histogram bins for Total Medicaid and CHIP Enrollment (median: 1031822.0).
bincount
0 – 3.616e+052640
3.616e+05 – 7.231e+051192
7.231e+05 – 1.085e+061581
1.085e+06 – 1.446e+061149
1.446e+06 – 1.808e+061171
1.808e+06 – 2.169e+06726
2.169e+06 – 2.531e+06291
2.531e+06 – 2.893e+06207
2.893e+06 – 3.254e+06331
3.254e+06 – 3.616e+06143
3.616e+06 – 3.977e+06175
3.977e+06 – 4.339e+06106
4.339e+06 – 4.7e+0684
4.7e+06 – 5.062e+0642
5.062e+06 – 5.423e+0626
5.423e+06 – 5.785e+0619
5.785e+06 – 6.147e+0675
6.147e+06 – 6.508e+0620
6.508e+06 – 6.87e+0651
6.87e+06 – 7.231e+0635
7.231e+06 – 7.593e+0632
7.593e+06 – 7.954e+063
7.954e+06 – 8.316e+060
8.316e+06 – 8.678e+060
8.678e+06 – 9.039e+060
9.039e+06 – 9.401e+060
9.401e+06 – 9.762e+060
9.762e+06 – 1.012e+070
1.012e+07 – 1.049e+070
1.049e+07 – 1.085e+070
1.085e+07 – 1.121e+070
1.121e+07 – 1.157e+076
1.157e+07 – 1.193e+0735
1.193e+07 – 1.229e+0738
1.229e+07 – 1.265e+0711
1.265e+07 – 1.302e+0710
1.302e+07 – 1.338e+0723
1.338e+07 – 1.374e+0739
1.374e+07 – 1.41e+0721
1.41e+07 – 1.446e+0718

Total Medicaid and CHIP Enrollment - footnotes categorical metadata

Free-text footnote qualifiers attached to state-month Medicaid/CHIP enrollment figures, explaining methodology caveats. The column is 93.11% null and only 710 rows carry any of 9 distinct notes; among those, 56.19% read 'Includes Individuals Enrolled At Any Time in Month (Not a Point-in-Time Count)', flagging that the headline counts are not point-in-time and so are not directly comparable across rows.

Treatment: Keep as a methodology flag; binarize or one-hot the few recurring notes when filtering comparable enrollment values.

anthropic:claude-opus-4-7 · confidence high
Out[76]:

saturn.columns["Total Medicaid and CHIP Enrollment - footnotes"].stats

statvalue
n10,302
nulls9,592 (93.1%)
unique9
top_value Includes Individuals Enrolled At Any Time in Month (Not a Point-in-Time Count)
top_rate 0.562
cardinality 9
entropy 1.832
entropy_ratio 0.578
alert: null_rate93.1% null
Fig 29.
Top values for Total Medicaid and CHIP Enrollment - footnotes.
Show data table
Top values for Total Medicaid and CHIP Enrollment - footnotes (9 unique shown, of 9 total).
valuecountshare
Includes Individuals Enrolled At Any Time in Month (Not a Point-in-Time Count)3993.9%
Includes Enrollees in Other Financial Assistance Programs Not Enrolled in Medicaid or CHIP1351.3%
Includes Retroactive Enrollments1201.2%
Does Not Include All Full-Benefit Medicaid enrollees; Does Not Include All CHIP enrollees190.2%
Does Not Include All Full-Benefit Non-MAGI enrollees110.1%
Does Not Include All Full-Benefit Medicaid enrollees100.1%
Includes Individuals Enrolled At Any Time in Month (Not a Point-in-Time Count); Includes Limited-Benefit Enrollees; Includes Retroactive Enrollments80.1%
Does Not Include All Individuals Conditionally Eligible50.0%
Unable to Provide Data due to System Limitations30.0%

Total Medicaid Enrollment numeric feature

Numeric tally of Medicaid enrollees, almost certainly aggregated by state-month or similar jurisdiction-period grain given 10302 rows and 8221 unique values. The distribution is severely right-skewed (skew 3.61, kurtosis 16.1) with the mean (1,432,519) sitting well above the median (949,244) and a max of 13,160,563 dwarfing Q3 of 1,646,917. About 6.7% of rows (691) flag as outliers, while nulls are negligible (0.5%) and zeros essentially absent.

Treatment: Log-transform before any regression or distance-based modelling to tame the heavy right tail.

anthropic:claude-opus-4-7 · confidence high
Out[79]:

saturn.columns["Total Medicaid Enrollment"].stats

statvalue
n10,302
nulls51 (0.5%)
unique8,221
min 0
max 1.316e+07
mean 1.433e+06
median 949,244
std 1.865e+06
q1 319,105
q3 1.647e+06
iqr 1.328e+06
skew 3.613
kurtosis 16.11
n_outliers 691
outlier_rate 0.06741
zero_rate 0.0002927
alert: high_skewskew=+3.61
alert: outliers6.7% rows beyond 1.5 IQR
Fig 30.
Distribution of Total Medicaid Enrollment. Vertical dash marks the median.
Show data table
Histogram bins for Total Medicaid Enrollment (median: 949244.0).
bincount
0 – 3.29e+052655
3.29e+05 – 6.58e+051219
6.58e+05 – 9.87e+051452
9.87e+05 – 1.316e+061130
1.316e+06 – 1.645e+061219
1.645e+06 – 1.974e+06738
1.974e+06 – 2.303e+06276
2.303e+06 – 2.632e+06180
2.632e+06 – 2.961e+06355
2.961e+06 – 3.29e+06147
3.29e+06 – 3.619e+06171
3.619e+06 – 3.948e+06137
3.948e+06 – 4.277e+0654
4.277e+06 – 4.606e+0642
4.606e+06 – 4.935e+0638
4.935e+06 – 5.264e+0614
5.264e+06 – 5.593e+0678
5.593e+06 – 5.922e+0639
5.922e+06 – 6.251e+0637
6.251e+06 – 6.58e+0626
6.58e+06 – 6.909e+0630
6.909e+06 – 7.238e+0613
7.238e+06 – 7.567e+060
7.567e+06 – 7.896e+060
7.896e+06 – 8.225e+060
8.225e+06 – 8.554e+060
8.554e+06 – 8.883e+060
8.883e+06 – 9.212e+060
9.212e+06 – 9.541e+060
9.541e+06 – 9.87e+060
9.87e+06 – 1.02e+073
1.02e+07 – 1.053e+0727
1.053e+07 – 1.086e+0735
1.086e+07 – 1.119e+0720
1.119e+07 – 1.152e+0710
1.152e+07 – 1.184e+0711
1.184e+07 – 1.217e+0724
1.217e+07 – 1.25e+0734
1.25e+07 – 1.283e+0721
1.283e+07 – 1.316e+0716

Total Medicaid Enrollment - footnotes categorical metadata

This is a footnote/annotation field qualifying Total Medicaid Enrollment figures, with only 7 distinct caveat strings across 10,302 rows. It is empty 93.21% of the time, and when populated, 57% of values are the single caveat 'Includes Individuals Enrolled At Any Time in Month (Not a Point-in-Time Count)'. The remaining notes flag methodology variations like retroactive enrollments, limited-benefit inclusions, or system limitations preventing reporting.

Treatment: Keep as a qualitative caveat flag; binarize as 'has_footnote' or one-hot the 7 categories rather than treating as a feature.

anthropic:claude-opus-4-7 · confidence high
Out[82]:

saturn.columns["Total Medicaid Enrollment - footnotes"].stats

statvalue
n10,302
nulls9,602 (93.2%)
unique7
top_value Includes Individuals Enrolled At Any Time in Month (Not a Point-in-Time Count)
top_rate 0.57
cardinality 7
entropy 1.725
entropy_ratio 0.6144
alert: null_rate93.2% null
Fig 31.
Top values for Total Medicaid Enrollment - footnotes.
Show data table
Top values for Total Medicaid Enrollment - footnotes (7 unique shown, of 7 total).
valuecountshare
Includes Individuals Enrolled At Any Time in Month (Not a Point-in-Time Count)3993.9%
Includes Enrollees in Other Financial Assistance Programs Not Enrolled in Medicaid or CHIP1351.3%
Includes Retroactive Enrollments1201.2%
Does Not Include All Full-Benefit Medicaid enrollees240.2%
Does Not Include All Full-Benefit Non-MAGI enrollees110.1%
Includes Individuals Enrolled At Any Time in Month (Not a Point-in-Time Count); Includes Limited-Benefit Enrollees; Includes Retroactive Enrollments80.1%
Unable to Provide Data due to System Limitations30.0%

Total CHIP Enrollment numeric feature

Numeric column capturing total CHIP (Children's Health Insurance Program) enrollment counts, likely per state-month or similar administrative unit. The distribution is heavily right-skewed (skew 3.90, kurtosis 18.21) with the mean (136,663) far above the median (78,933) and a max of 1,317,347 versus a Q3 of 171,960. About 5.3% of rows (542) are flagged outliers, and nulls and zeros are negligible.

Treatment: log-transform before regression to tame the heavy right tail.

anthropic:claude-opus-4-7 · confidence high
Out[85]:

saturn.columns["Total CHIP Enrollment"].stats

statvalue
n10,302
nulls51 (0.5%)
unique7,918
min 0
max 1.317e+06
mean 1.367e+05
median 78,933
std 2.026e+05
q1 2.605e+04
q3 171,960
iqr 1.459e+05
skew 3.897
kurtosis 18.21
n_outliers 542
outlier_rate 0.05287
zero_rate 0.0002927
alert: high_skewskew=+3.90
alert: outliers5.3% rows beyond 1.5 IQR
Fig 32.
Distribution of Total CHIP Enrollment. Vertical dash marks the median.
Show data table
Histogram bins for Total CHIP Enrollment (median: 78933.0).
bincount
0 – 3.293e+042984
3.293e+04 – 6.587e+041521
6.587e+04 – 9.88e+041323
9.88e+04 – 1.317e+05963
1.317e+05 – 1.647e+05780
1.647e+05 – 1.976e+05717
1.976e+05 – 2.305e+05428
2.305e+05 – 2.635e+05359
2.635e+05 – 2.964e+05303
2.964e+05 – 3.293e+05186
3.293e+05 – 3.623e+05137
3.623e+05 – 3.952e+0510
3.952e+05 – 4.281e+0512
4.281e+05 – 4.611e+058
4.611e+05 – 4.94e+058
4.94e+05 – 5.269e+0521
5.269e+05 – 5.599e+0565
5.599e+05 – 5.928e+05112
5.928e+05 – 6.257e+0567
6.257e+05 – 6.587e+0518
6.587e+05 – 6.916e+0528
6.916e+05 – 7.245e+050
7.245e+05 – 7.575e+050
7.575e+05 – 7.904e+050
7.904e+05 – 8.233e+050
8.233e+05 – 8.563e+050
8.563e+05 – 8.892e+050
8.892e+05 – 9.221e+050
9.221e+05 – 9.551e+050
9.551e+05 – 9.88e+050
9.88e+05 – 1.021e+060
1.021e+06 – 1.054e+060
1.054e+06 – 1.087e+060
1.087e+06 – 1.12e+060
1.12e+06 – 1.153e+060
1.153e+06 – 1.186e+060
1.186e+06 – 1.219e+060
1.219e+06 – 1.251e+0636
1.251e+06 – 1.284e+0615
1.284e+06 – 1.317e+06150

Total CHIP Enrollment - footnotes categorical metadata

This is a sparse footnote/qualifier column accompanying CHIP enrollment counts, with only 4 distinct annotation strings across 10,302 rows. It is null 95.92% of the time, and when present is dominated (76.0%) by "Includes Individuals Enrolled At Any Time in Month (Not a Point-in-Time Count)". The remaining notes flag retroactive enrollments, incomplete coverage, or system-limitation gaps — caveats that materially affect comparability of the enrollment figures.

Treatment: Keep as a caveat flag joined to the enrollment metric; do not use as a model feature.

anthropic:claude-opus-4-7 · confidence high
Out[88]:

saturn.columns["Total CHIP Enrollment - footnotes"].stats

statvalue
n10,302
nulls9,882 (95.9%)
unique4
top_value Includes Individuals Enrolled At Any Time in Month (Not a Point-in-Time Count)
top_rate 0.7595
cardinality 4
entropy 1.033
entropy_ratio 0.5167
alert: null_rate95.9% null
Fig 33.
Top values for Total CHIP Enrollment - footnotes.
Show data table
Top values for Total CHIP Enrollment - footnotes (4 unique shown, of 4 total).
valuecountshare
Includes Individuals Enrolled At Any Time in Month (Not a Point-in-Time Count)3193.1%
Includes Retroactive Enrollments730.7%
Does Not Include All CHIP enrollees250.2%
Unable to Provide Data due to System Limitations30.0%

Total Adult Medicaid Enrollment numeric feature

Numeric tally of total adult Medicaid enrollees, almost certainly aggregated by state and reporting period given the multi-million maximum (8,497,290) and median of 551,447. The column is sparsely populated—84.65% null—and heavily right-skewed (skew 4.56, kurtosis 23.4), with 62 outliers and a standard deviation (1,268,819) larger than the mean (810,066). Only 1,415 unique values across 10,302 rows suggests repeated state-level totals rather than per-person records.

Treatment: Impute or filter the 84.65% nulls and log-transform before any regression to tame the skew.

anthropic:claude-opus-4-7 · confidence high
Out[91]:

saturn.columns["Total Adult Medicaid Enrollment"].stats

statvalue
n10,302
nulls8,721 (84.7%)
unique1,415
min 0
max 8.497e+06
mean 8.101e+05
median 551,447
std 1.269e+06
q1 168,141
q3 951,232
iqr 783,091
skew 4.556
kurtosis 23.38
n_outliers 62
outlier_rate 0.03922
zero_rate 0.001898
alert: null_rate84.7% null
alert: high_skewskew=+4.56
Fig 34.
Distribution of Total Adult Medicaid Enrollment. Vertical dash marks the median.
Show data table
Histogram bins for Total Adult Medicaid Enrollment (median: 551447.0).
bincount
0 – 2.179e+05490
2.179e+05 – 4.358e+05238
4.358e+05 – 6.536e+05209
6.536e+05 – 8.715e+05183
8.715e+05 – 1.089e+06203
1.089e+06 – 1.307e+0623
1.307e+06 – 1.525e+0680
1.525e+06 – 1.743e+0674
1.743e+06 – 1.961e+0619
1.961e+06 – 2.179e+060
2.179e+06 – 2.397e+060
2.397e+06 – 2.615e+060
2.615e+06 – 2.832e+060
2.832e+06 – 3.05e+060
3.05e+06 – 3.268e+060
3.268e+06 – 3.486e+060
3.486e+06 – 3.704e+060
3.704e+06 – 3.922e+060
3.922e+06 – 4.14e+0615
4.14e+06 – 4.358e+0616
4.358e+06 – 4.575e+060
4.575e+06 – 4.793e+060
4.793e+06 – 5.011e+060
5.011e+06 – 5.229e+060
5.229e+06 – 5.447e+060
5.447e+06 – 5.665e+060
5.665e+06 – 5.883e+060
5.883e+06 – 6.101e+060
6.101e+06 – 6.318e+060
6.318e+06 – 6.536e+060
6.536e+06 – 6.754e+060
6.754e+06 – 6.972e+060
6.972e+06 – 7.19e+060
7.19e+06 – 7.408e+060
7.408e+06 – 7.626e+060
7.626e+06 – 7.844e+060
7.844e+06 – 8.062e+060
8.062e+06 – 8.279e+062
8.279e+06 – 8.497e+0629

Total Adult Medicaid Enrollment - footnotes categorical metadata

This is a footnote/qualifier column for the Total Adult Medicaid Enrollment metric, carrying free-text caveats about how a state's count was constructed. It is overwhelmingly empty (98.79% null) with only 4 distinct notes across 10,302 rows; the dominant note (56% of non-null) flags that counts include anyone enrolled at any time in the month rather than a point-in-time snapshot. A small but notable 3 rows admit the data could not be provided due to system limitations.

Treatment: Keep as a qualitative caveat flag joined to the enrollment column; do not use as a model feature.

anthropic:claude-opus-4-7 · confidence high
Out[94]:

saturn.columns["Total Adult Medicaid Enrollment - footnotes"].stats

statvalue
n10,302
nulls10,177 (98.8%)
unique4
top_value Includes Individuals Enrolled At Any Time in Month (Not a Point-in-Time Count)
top_rate 0.56
cardinality 4
entropy 1.382
entropy_ratio 0.6908
alert: null_rate98.8% null
Fig 35.
Top values for Total Adult Medicaid Enrollment - footnotes.
Show data table
Top values for Total Adult Medicaid Enrollment - footnotes (4 unique shown, of 4 total).
valuecountshare
Includes Individuals Enrolled At Any Time in Month (Not a Point-in-Time Count)700.7%
Includes Retroactive Enrollments440.4%
Includes Individuals Enrolled At Any Time in Month (Not a Point-in-Time Count); Includes Limited-Benefit Enrollees; Includes Retroactive Enrollments80.1%
Unable to Provide Data due to System Limitations30.0%

Total Medicaid and CHIP Determinations Processed in Less than 24 Hours numeric feature

Counts of Medicaid/CHIP determinations processed in under 24 hours, reported per state-month or similar reporting unit. The distribution is severely right-skewed (skew 6.44, kurtosis 47.28) with a median of 3,470 but a max of 791,175 and 699 outliers (11.9%). Notably, 43.1% of rows are null, suggesting many reporters did not submit this metric.

Treatment: Log-transform and impute or flag missingness before modelling.

anthropic:claude-opus-4-7 · confidence high
Out[97]:

saturn.columns["Total Medicaid and CHIP Determinations Processed in Less than 24 Hours"].stats

statvalue
n10,302
nulls4,437 (43.1%)
unique2,701
min 0
max 791,175
mean 2.224e+04
median 3,470
std 7.333e+04
q1 932
q3 12,172
iqr 11,240
skew 6.441
kurtosis 47.28
n_outliers 699
outlier_rate 0.1192
zero_rate 0.02148
alert: null_rate43.1% null
alert: high_skewskew=+6.44
alert: outliers11.9% rows beyond 1.5 IQR
Fig 36.
Distribution of Total Medicaid and CHIP Determinations Processed in Less than 24 Hours. Vertical dash marks the median.
Show data table
Histogram bins for Total Medicaid and CHIP Determinations Processed in Less than 24 Hours (median: 3470.0).
bincount
0 – 1.978e+044914
1.978e+04 – 3.956e+04349
3.956e+04 – 5.934e+04102
5.934e+04 – 7.912e+04136
7.912e+04 – 9.89e+0443
9.89e+04 – 1.187e+0569
1.187e+05 – 1.385e+0568
1.385e+05 – 1.582e+0535
1.582e+05 – 1.78e+0512
1.78e+05 – 1.978e+0514
1.978e+05 – 2.176e+054
2.176e+05 – 2.374e+058
2.374e+05 – 2.571e+052
2.571e+05 – 2.769e+058
2.769e+05 – 2.967e+056
2.967e+05 – 3.165e+054
3.165e+05 – 3.362e+054
3.362e+05 – 3.56e+052
3.56e+05 – 3.758e+058
3.758e+05 – 3.956e+052
3.956e+05 – 4.154e+054
4.154e+05 – 4.351e+054
4.351e+05 – 4.549e+054
4.549e+05 – 4.747e+052
4.747e+05 – 4.945e+050
4.945e+05 – 5.143e+0510
5.143e+05 – 5.34e+056
5.34e+05 – 5.538e+059
5.538e+05 – 5.736e+054
5.736e+05 – 5.934e+054
5.934e+05 – 6.132e+056
6.132e+05 – 6.329e+054
6.329e+05 – 6.527e+054
6.527e+05 – 6.725e+052
6.725e+05 – 6.923e+050
6.923e+05 – 7.121e+052
7.121e+05 – 7.318e+052
7.318e+05 – 7.516e+054
7.516e+05 – 7.714e+052
7.714e+05 – 7.912e+052

Total Medicaid and CHIP Determinations Processed in Less than 24 Hours - footnotes categorical metadata

Footnote/caveat field annotating the '<24 hour Medicaid/CHIP determinations' metric, capturing reporting caveats reported by states. It is mostly empty (89.21% null) and only 20 distinct strings appear across 10302 rows; when present, the dominant caveat is 'Incorrectly reporting processing time at application level, as opposed to the individual level' at 37.77% of non-nulls. Several values are semicolon-concatenated combinations of base caveats, so the 20 categories are not independent.

Treatment: Keep as a data-quality flag joined to the metric; split on ';' into boolean caveat indicators rather than modelling as a single category.

anthropic:claude-opus-4-7 · confidence high
Out[100]:

saturn.columns["Total Medicaid and CHIP Determinations Processed in Less than 24 Hours - footnotes"].stats

statvalue
n10,302
nulls9,190 (89.2%)
unique20
top_value Incorrectly reporting processing time at application level, as opposed to the individual level
top_rate 0.3777
cardinality 20
entropy 2.968
entropy_ratio 0.6867
alert: null_rate89.2% null
Fig 37.
Top values for Total Medicaid and CHIP Determinations Processed in Less than 24 Hours - footnotes.
Show data table
Top values for Total Medicaid and CHIP Determinations Processed in Less than 24 Hours - footnotes (20 unique shown, of 20 total).
valuecountshare
Incorrectly reporting processing time at application level, as opposed to the individual level4204.1%
Incorrectly includes redeterminations1771.7%
Does not include all MAGI determinations on applications1431.4%
Determinations conducted in less than 24 hours are reported under the 1-7 days category; Incorrectly reporting processing time at application level, as opposed to the individual level900.9%
Determinations conducted in less than 24 hours are reported under the 1-7 days category; Incorrectly reporting processing time at application level, as opposed to the individual level; Incorrectly includes redeterminations700.7%
Incorrectly includes redeterminations; Does not include all MAGI determinations on applications570.6%
Unable to provide data due to system limitations390.4%
Includes some non-MAGI determinations on applications240.2%
Includes some non-MAGI determinations on applications; Incorrectly includes redeterminations180.2%
Reflects incorrect start dates for processing time on some reopened applications100.1%
Determinations conducted in less than 24 hours are reported under the 1-7 days category; Incorrectly reporting processing time at application level, as opposed to the individual level; Does not include all MAGI determinations on applications100.1%
Includes some non-Medicaid or CHIP determinations on applications; Reflects incorrect start dates for processing time on some reopened applications80.1%
Incorrectly reporting processing time at application level, as opposed to the individual level; Does not include all MAGI determinations on applications80.1%
Includes some non-MAGI determinations on applications; Does not include all MAGI determinations on applications60.1%
Includes some non-MAGI determinations on applications; Incorrectly reporting processing time at application level, as opposed to the individual level60.1%
Determinations conducted in less than 24 hours are reported under the 1-7 days category60.1%
Incorrectly includes reinstatements60.1%
Incorrectly reporting processing time at application level, as opposed to the individual level; Incorrectly includes redeterminations60.1%
Determinations conducted in less than 24 hours are reported under the 1-7 days category; Incorrectly includes redeterminations60.1%
Includes some non-Medicaid or CHIP determinations on applications20.0%

Total Medicaid and CHIP Determinations Processed Between 24 Hours and 7 Days numeric feature

This is a state/period-level count of Medicaid and CHIP eligibility determinations completed within a 24-hour to 7-day window. The distribution is heavily right-skewed (skew 4.39, kurtosis 29.5) with a median of 2,312 but a max of 133,996, and 10.3% of values flag as outliers. Notably, 43.1% of rows are null, suggesting many reporting periods or jurisdictions did not submit this metric.

Treatment: Log-transform and impute or flag missingness before modelling.

anthropic:claude-opus-4-7 · confidence high
Out[103]:

saturn.columns["Total Medicaid and CHIP Determinations Processed Between 24 Hours and 7 Days"].stats

statvalue
n10,302
nulls4,437 (43.1%)
unique2,559
min 0
max 133,996
mean 5465
median 2,312
std 9481
q1 723
q3 5,802
iqr 5,079
skew 4.392
kurtosis 29.55
n_outliers 602
outlier_rate 0.1026
zero_rate 0.02677
alert: null_rate43.1% null
alert: high_skewskew=+4.39
alert: outliers10.3% rows beyond 1.5 IQR
Fig 38.
Distribution of Total Medicaid and CHIP Determinations Processed Between 24 Hours and 7 Days. Vertical dash marks the median.
Show data table
Histogram bins for Total Medicaid and CHIP Determinations Processed Between 24 Hours and 7 Days (median: 2312.0).
bincount
0 – 33503582
3350 – 67001036
6700 – 1.005e+04405
1.005e+04 – 1.34e+04240
1.34e+04 – 1.675e+04119
1.675e+04 – 2.01e+0474
2.01e+04 – 2.345e+04109
2.345e+04 – 2.68e+0493
2.68e+04 – 3.015e+0453
3.015e+04 – 3.35e+0431
3.35e+04 – 3.685e+0418
3.685e+04 – 4.02e+0419
4.02e+04 – 4.355e+0411
4.355e+04 – 4.69e+0410
4.69e+04 – 5.025e+047
5.025e+04 – 5.36e+049
5.36e+04 – 5.695e+0411
5.695e+04 – 6.03e+0412
6.03e+04 – 6.365e+042
6.365e+04 – 6.7e+048
6.7e+04 – 7.035e+042
7.035e+04 – 7.37e+044
7.37e+04 – 7.705e+040
7.705e+04 – 8.04e+040
8.04e+04 – 8.375e+044
8.375e+04 – 8.71e+042
8.71e+04 – 9.045e+040
9.045e+04 – 9.38e+040
9.38e+04 – 9.715e+040
9.715e+04 – 1.005e+050
1.005e+05 – 1.038e+052
1.038e+05 – 1.072e+050
1.072e+05 – 1.105e+050
1.105e+05 – 1.139e+050
1.139e+05 – 1.172e+050
1.172e+05 – 1.206e+050
1.206e+05 – 1.239e+050
1.239e+05 – 1.273e+050
1.273e+05 – 1.306e+050
1.306e+05 – 1.34e+052

Total Medicaid and CHIP Determinations Processed Between 24 Hours and 7 Days - footnotes categorical metadata

This is a footnotes/caveats column accompanying a Medicaid/CHIP determinations metric, holding free-form annotations about reporting irregularities. It is empty 89.21% of the time, and among the 1,111 populated rows just 21 distinct messages appear, with 'Incorrectly reporting processing time at application level...' covering 37.77% of non-nulls. Notably, several entries are semicolon-joined composites of multiple caveats, suggesting the field is a concatenation rather than a clean code.

Treatment: Keep as a qualitative caveat flag; split on ';' and one-hot the distinct footnote codes if used as features.

anthropic:claude-opus-4-7 · confidence high
Out[106]:

saturn.columns["Total Medicaid and CHIP Determinations Processed Between 24 Hours and 7 Days - footnotes"].stats

statvalue
n10,302
nulls9,190 (89.2%)
unique21
top_value Incorrectly reporting processing time at application level, as opposed to the individual level
top_rate 0.3777
cardinality 21
entropy 3.026
entropy_ratio 0.689
alert: null_rate89.2% null
Fig 39.
Top values for Total Medicaid and CHIP Determinations Processed Between 24 Hours and 7 Days - footnotes.
Show data table
Top values for Total Medicaid and CHIP Determinations Processed Between 24 Hours and 7 Days - footnotes (20 unique shown, of 21 total).
valuecountshare
Incorrectly reporting processing time at application level, as opposed to the individual level4204.1%
Incorrectly includes redeterminations1771.7%
Does not include all MAGI determinations on applications1431.4%
Determinations conducted in less than 24 hours are reported under the 1-7 days category; Incorrectly reporting processing time at application level, as opposed to the individual level; MAGI determinations conducted in 6-7 days are reported under the 8-30 days category720.7%
Determinations conducted in less than 24 hours are reported under the 1-7 days category; Incorrectly reporting processing time at application level, as opposed to the individual level; Incorrectly includes redeterminations700.7%
Incorrectly includes redeterminations; Does not include all MAGI determinations on applications570.6%
Unable to provide data due to system limitations390.4%
Includes some non-MAGI determinations on applications240.2%
Includes some non-MAGI determinations on applications; Incorrectly includes redeterminations180.2%
Determinations conducted in less than 24 hours are reported under the 1-7 days category; Incorrectly reporting processing time at application level, as opposed to the individual level180.2%
Reflects incorrect start dates for processing time on some reopened applications100.1%
Determinations conducted in less than 24 hours are reported under the 1-7 days category; Incorrectly reporting processing time at application level, as opposed to the individual level; Does not include all MAGI determinations on applications100.1%
Includes some non-Medicaid or CHIP determinations on applications; Reflects incorrect start dates for processing time on some reopened applications80.1%
Incorrectly reporting processing time at application level, as opposed to the individual level; Does not include all MAGI determinations on applications80.1%
Includes some non-MAGI determinations on applications; Does not include all MAGI determinations on applications60.1%
Includes some non-MAGI determinations on applications; Incorrectly reporting processing time at application level, as opposed to the individual level60.1%
Determinations conducted in less than 24 hours are reported under the 1-7 days category60.1%
Incorrectly includes reinstatements60.1%
Incorrectly reporting processing time at application level, as opposed to the individual level; Incorrectly includes redeterminations60.1%
Determinations conducted in less than 24 hours are reported under the 1-7 days category; Incorrectly includes redeterminations60.1%

Total Medicaid and CHIP Determinations Processed Between 8 Days and 30 Days numeric feature

Numeric count of Medicaid/CHIP determinations processed within an 8-30 day window, likely reported per state-month or similar reporting unit. The distribution is heavily right-skewed (skew 3.98, kurtosis 19.86) with a median of 2,528 but a max of 155,529, and 10.2% of values flagged as outliers. Note that 43.1% of rows are null and 2.6% are exactly zero, so coverage is partial before any modelling.

Treatment: Impute or filter the 43% nulls, then log-transform to tame the heavy right tail before modelling.

anthropic:claude-opus-4-7 · confidence high
Out[109]:

saturn.columns["Total Medicaid and CHIP Determinations Processed Between 8 Days and 30 Days"].stats

statvalue
n10,302
nulls4,437 (43.1%)
unique2,608
min 0
max 155,529
mean 7967
median 2,528
std 1.528e+04
q1 624
q3 7,866
iqr 7,242
skew 3.975
kurtosis 19.86
n_outliers 601
outlier_rate 0.1025
zero_rate 0.02643
alert: null_rate43.1% null
alert: high_skewskew=+3.98
alert: outliers10.2% rows beyond 1.5 IQR
Fig 40.
Distribution of Total Medicaid and CHIP Determinations Processed Between 8 Days and 30 Days. Vertical dash marks the median.
Show data table
Histogram bins for Total Medicaid and CHIP Determinations Processed Between 8 Days and 30 Days (median: 2528.0).
bincount
0 – 38883532
3888 – 7776853
7776 – 1.166e+04492
1.166e+04 – 1.555e+04228
1.555e+04 – 1.944e+04177
1.944e+04 – 2.333e+0462
2.333e+04 – 2.722e+0474
2.722e+04 – 3.111e+0464
3.111e+04 – 3.499e+0439
3.499e+04 – 3.888e+0448
3.888e+04 – 4.277e+0444
4.277e+04 – 4.666e+0443
4.666e+04 – 5.055e+0451
5.055e+04 – 5.444e+0431
5.444e+04 – 5.832e+0417
5.832e+04 – 6.221e+0411
6.221e+04 – 6.61e+048
6.61e+04 – 6.999e+046
6.999e+04 – 7.388e+046
7.388e+04 – 7.776e+0410
7.776e+04 – 8.165e+046
8.165e+04 – 8.554e+048
8.554e+04 – 8.943e+044
8.943e+04 – 9.332e+042
9.332e+04 – 9.721e+046
9.721e+04 – 1.011e+0510
1.011e+05 – 1.05e+0513
1.05e+05 – 1.089e+056
1.089e+05 – 1.128e+052
1.128e+05 – 1.166e+052
1.166e+05 – 1.205e+052
1.205e+05 – 1.244e+052
1.244e+05 – 1.283e+052
1.283e+05 – 1.322e+052
1.322e+05 – 1.361e+050
1.361e+05 – 1.4e+050
1.4e+05 – 1.439e+050
1.439e+05 – 1.478e+050
1.478e+05 – 1.516e+050
1.516e+05 – 1.555e+052

Total Medicaid and CHIP Determinations Processed Between 8 Days and 30 Days - footnotes categorical metadata

Free-text footnote field qualifying caveats on the 8–30 day Medicaid/CHIP determination counts; 89.26% of the 10,302 rows are null, so footnotes are the exception not the rule. Among the 1,106 populated rows there are only 16 distinct values (entropy 2.82, ratio 0.70), with 39.60% being the single caveat 'Incorrectly reporting processing time at application level, as opposed to the individual level' — a sizeable data-quality warning on the underlying metric. Several top values are semicolon-concatenated combinations, indicating the field stacks multiple caveats per row.

Treatment: Keep as a caveat flag on the paired metric; split on ';' to derive boolean indicators rather than modelling directly.

anthropic:claude-opus-4-7 · confidence high
Out[112]:

saturn.columns["Total Medicaid and CHIP Determinations Processed Between 8 Days and 30 Days - footnotes"].stats

statvalue
n10,302
nulls9,196 (89.3%)
unique16
top_value Incorrectly reporting processing time at application level, as opposed to the individual level
top_rate 0.396
cardinality 16
entropy 2.818
entropy_ratio 0.7045
alert: null_rate89.3% null
Fig 41.
Top values for Total Medicaid and CHIP Determinations Processed Between 8 Days and 30 Days - footnotes.
Show data table
Top values for Total Medicaid and CHIP Determinations Processed Between 8 Days and 30 Days - footnotes (16 unique shown, of 16 total).
valuecountshare
Incorrectly reporting processing time at application level, as opposed to the individual level4384.3%
Incorrectly includes redeterminations1831.8%
Does not include all MAGI determinations on applications1431.4%
Incorrectly reporting processing time at application level, as opposed to the individual level; Incorrectly includes redeterminations760.7%
Incorrectly reporting processing time at application level, as opposed to the individual level; MAGI determinations conducted in 6-7 days are reported under the 8-30 days category720.7%
Incorrectly includes redeterminations; Does not include all MAGI determinations on applications570.6%
Unable to provide data due to system limitations390.4%
Includes some non-MAGI determinations on applications240.2%
Includes some non-MAGI determinations on applications; Incorrectly includes redeterminations180.2%
Incorrectly reporting processing time at application level, as opposed to the individual level; Does not include all MAGI determinations on applications180.2%
Reflects incorrect start dates for processing time on some reopened applications100.1%
Includes some non-Medicaid or CHIP determinations on applications; Reflects incorrect start dates for processing time on some reopened applications80.1%
Includes some non-MAGI determinations on applications; Does not include all MAGI determinations on applications60.1%
Includes some non-MAGI determinations on applications; Incorrectly reporting processing time at application level, as opposed to the individual level60.1%
Incorrectly includes reinstatements60.1%
Includes some non-Medicaid or CHIP determinations on applications20.0%

Total Medicaid and CHIP Determinations Processed between 31 days and 45 days numeric feature

This is a numeric operational metric counting Medicaid and CHIP determinations processed in a 31-45 day window, likely reported per state-month. The distribution is heavily right-skewed (skew 4.90, kurtosis 31.95) with a median of 693 but a mean of 2917 and max of 81475, indicating a few jurisdictions with very large backlogs. Notable concerns: 43.07% of values are null, 6.63% are zero, and 12.75% are flagged as outliers.

Treatment: Investigate the 43% nulls (likely non-reporters) and log-transform before modelling to tame the heavy right tail.

anthropic:claude-opus-4-7 · confidence high
Out[115]:

saturn.columns["Total Medicaid and CHIP Determinations Processed between 31 days and 45 days"].stats

statvalue
n10,302
nulls4,437 (43.1%)
unique1,923
min 0
max 81,475
mean 2917
median 693
std 6725
q1 106
q3 2,322
iqr 2,216
skew 4.899
kurtosis 31.95
n_outliers 748
outlier_rate 0.1275
zero_rate 0.06633
alert: null_rate43.1% null
alert: high_skewskew=+4.90
alert: outliers12.8% rows beyond 1.5 IQR
Fig 42.
Distribution of Total Medicaid and CHIP Determinations Processed between 31 days and 45 days. Vertical dash marks the median.
Show data table
Histogram bins for Total Medicaid and CHIP Determinations Processed between 31 days and 45 days (median: 693.0).
bincount
0 – 20374225
2037 – 4074690
4074 – 6111267
6111 – 8148154
8148 – 1.018e+0487
1.018e+04 – 1.222e+0468
1.222e+04 – 1.426e+0454
1.426e+04 – 1.63e+0445
1.63e+04 – 1.833e+0455
1.833e+04 – 2.037e+0435
2.037e+04 – 2.241e+0426
2.241e+04 – 2.444e+0426
2.444e+04 – 2.648e+0442
2.648e+04 – 2.852e+0414
2.852e+04 – 3.055e+0413
3.055e+04 – 3.259e+0412
3.259e+04 – 3.463e+044
3.463e+04 – 3.666e+040
3.666e+04 – 3.87e+040
3.87e+04 – 4.074e+048
4.074e+04 – 4.277e+040
4.277e+04 – 4.481e+044
4.481e+04 – 4.685e+046
4.685e+04 – 4.888e+042
4.888e+04 – 5.092e+044
5.092e+04 – 5.296e+042
5.296e+04 – 5.5e+046
5.5e+04 – 5.703e+042
5.703e+04 – 5.907e+046
5.907e+04 – 6.111e+042
6.111e+04 – 6.314e+040
6.314e+04 – 6.518e+040
6.518e+04 – 6.722e+042
6.722e+04 – 6.925e+040
6.925e+04 – 7.129e+040
7.129e+04 – 7.333e+042
7.333e+04 – 7.536e+040
7.536e+04 – 7.74e+040
7.74e+04 – 7.944e+040
7.944e+04 – 8.148e+042

Total Medicaid and CHIP Determinations Processed between 31 days and 45 days - footnotes categorical metadata

This is a footnote/caveat column annotating data quality issues for the 31-45 day Medicaid/CHIP determinations metric. It's null 89.26% of the time, meaning footnotes apply to only ~11% of rows, but among those the top caveat — 'Incorrectly reporting processing time at application level, as opposed to the individual level' — covers 46.11% (510 records), suggesting a systemic reporting inconsistency. The 15 unique values include compound entries joined by semicolons, indicating multiple caveats can co-occur on a single row.

Treatment: Keep as a qualitative caveat flag; split on '; ' into boolean indicators if you need to filter unreliable rows from the main metric.

anthropic:claude-opus-4-7 · confidence high
Out[118]:

saturn.columns["Total Medicaid and CHIP Determinations Processed between 31 days and 45 days - footnotes"].stats

statvalue
n10,302
nulls9,196 (89.3%)
unique15
top_value Incorrectly reporting processing time at application level, as opposed to the individual level
top_rate 0.4611
cardinality 15
entropy 2.547
entropy_ratio 0.652
alert: null_rate89.3% null
Fig 43.
Top values for Total Medicaid and CHIP Determinations Processed between 31 days and 45 days - footnotes.
Show data table
Top values for Total Medicaid and CHIP Determinations Processed between 31 days and 45 days - footnotes (15 unique shown, of 15 total).
valuecountshare
Incorrectly reporting processing time at application level, as opposed to the individual level5105.0%
Incorrectly includes redeterminations1831.8%
Does not include all MAGI determinations on applications1431.4%
Incorrectly reporting processing time at application level, as opposed to the individual level; Incorrectly includes redeterminations760.7%
Incorrectly includes redeterminations; Does not include all MAGI determinations on applications570.6%
Unable to provide data due to system limitations390.4%
Includes some non-MAGI determinations on applications240.2%
Includes some non-MAGI determinations on applications; Incorrectly includes redeterminations180.2%
Incorrectly reporting processing time at application level, as opposed to the individual level; Does not include all MAGI determinations on applications180.2%
Reflects incorrect start dates for processing time on some reopened applications100.1%
Includes some non-Medicaid or CHIP determinations on applications; Reflects incorrect start dates for processing time on some reopened applications80.1%
Includes some non-MAGI determinations on applications; Does not include all MAGI determinations on applications60.1%
Includes some non-MAGI determinations on applications; Incorrectly reporting processing time at application level, as opposed to the individual level60.1%
Incorrectly includes reinstatements60.1%
Includes some non-Medicaid or CHIP determinations on applications20.0%

Total Medicaid and CHIP Determinations Processed in More than 45 Days numeric feature

Counts of Medicaid/CHIP applications processed beyond the 45-day SLA, reported per state-month or similar reporting unit. The distribution is severely right-skewed (skew 5.26, kurtosis 37.4): the median is 395 but the mean is 3,027 and the max reaches 106,943, with 15.4% flagged as outliers. Note that 43% of rows are null and 10% are exact zeros, so coverage is uneven across reporters.

Treatment: Log1p-transform and impute or flag the 43% nulls before any modelling or aggregation.

anthropic:claude-opus-4-7 · confidence high
Out[121]:

saturn.columns["Total Medicaid and CHIP Determinations Processed in More than 45 Days"].stats

statvalue
n10,302
nulls4,437 (43.1%)
unique1,691
min 0
max 106,943
mean 3028
median 395
std 8135
q1 90
q3 1,545
iqr 1,455
skew 5.264
kurtosis 37.42
n_outliers 902
outlier_rate 0.1538
zero_rate 0.1001
alert: null_rate43.1% null
alert: high_skewskew=+5.26
alert: outliers15.4% rows beyond 1.5 IQR
Fig 44.
Distribution of Total Medicaid and CHIP Determinations Processed in More than 45 Days. Vertical dash marks the median.
Show data table
Histogram bins for Total Medicaid and CHIP Determinations Processed in More than 45 Days (median: 395.0).
bincount
0 – 26744746
2674 – 5347361
5347 – 8021146
8021 – 1.069e+04138
1.069e+04 – 1.337e+0480
1.337e+04 – 1.604e+0477
1.604e+04 – 1.872e+0454
1.872e+04 – 2.139e+0445
2.139e+04 – 2.406e+0434
2.406e+04 – 2.674e+0431
2.674e+04 – 2.941e+0429
2.941e+04 – 3.208e+0418
3.208e+04 – 3.476e+0420
3.476e+04 – 3.743e+0418
3.743e+04 – 4.01e+048
4.01e+04 – 4.278e+044
4.278e+04 – 4.545e+048
4.545e+04 – 4.812e+046
4.812e+04 – 5.08e+048
5.08e+04 – 5.347e+0410
5.347e+04 – 5.615e+040
5.615e+04 – 5.882e+042
5.882e+04 – 6.149e+044
6.149e+04 – 6.417e+040
6.417e+04 – 6.684e+042
6.684e+04 – 6.951e+042
6.951e+04 – 7.219e+044
7.219e+04 – 7.486e+040
7.486e+04 – 7.753e+040
7.753e+04 – 8.021e+042
8.021e+04 – 8.288e+040
8.288e+04 – 8.555e+042
8.555e+04 – 8.823e+044
8.823e+04 – 9.09e+040
9.09e+04 – 9.358e+040
9.358e+04 – 9.625e+040
9.625e+04 – 9.892e+040
9.892e+04 – 1.016e+050
1.016e+05 – 1.043e+050
1.043e+05 – 1.069e+052

Total Medicaid and CHIP Determinations Processed in More than 45 Days - footnotes categorical metadata

Footnote/caveat field annotating data-quality issues with the '>45 days' Medicaid/CHIP determinations metric. Sparse - 89.26% null - and dominated by one caveat ('Incorrectly reporting processing time at application level...') at 46.11% of the 1,104 non-null rows, with only 15 distinct values that include semicolon-concatenated combinations. Entropy ratio of 0.652 confirms a skewed but multi-category caveat vocabulary worth preserving for data-quality filtering.

Treatment: Keep as a data-quality flag; split on '; ' into a multi-hot caveat indicator and exclude or down-weight affected rows in downstream metric analysis.

anthropic:claude-opus-4-7 · confidence high
Out[124]:

saturn.columns["Total Medicaid and CHIP Determinations Processed in More than 45 Days - footnotes"].stats

statvalue
n10,302
nulls9,196 (89.3%)
unique15
top_value Incorrectly reporting processing time at application level, as opposed to the individual level
top_rate 0.4611
cardinality 15
entropy 2.547
entropy_ratio 0.652
alert: null_rate89.3% null
Fig 45.
Top values for Total Medicaid and CHIP Determinations Processed in More than 45 Days - footnotes.
Show data table
Top values for Total Medicaid and CHIP Determinations Processed in More than 45 Days - footnotes (15 unique shown, of 15 total).
valuecountshare
Incorrectly reporting processing time at application level, as opposed to the individual level5105.0%
Incorrectly includes redeterminations1831.8%
Does not include all MAGI determinations on applications1431.4%
Incorrectly reporting processing time at application level, as opposed to the individual level; Incorrectly includes redeterminations760.7%
Incorrectly includes redeterminations; Does not include all MAGI determinations on applications570.6%
Unable to provide data due to system limitations390.4%
Includes some non-MAGI determinations on applications240.2%
Includes some non-MAGI determinations on applications; Incorrectly includes redeterminations180.2%
Incorrectly reporting processing time at application level, as opposed to the individual level; Does not include all MAGI determinations on applications180.2%
Reflects incorrect start dates for processing time on some reopened applications100.1%
Includes some non-Medicaid or CHIP determinations on applications; Reflects incorrect start dates for processing time on some reopened applications80.1%
Includes some non-MAGI determinations on applications; Does not include all MAGI determinations on applications60.1%
Includes some non-MAGI determinations on applications; Incorrectly reporting processing time at application level, as opposed to the individual level60.1%
Incorrectly includes reinstatements60.1%
Includes some non-Medicaid or CHIP determinations on applications20.0%

Total Call Center Volume (Number of Calls) numeric feature

Numeric volume metric capturing total calls handled by a call center, reported per row (likely per period or center). The column is sparsely populated with a 69.49% null rate and only 1,592 unique values across 10,302 rows. Distribution is heavily right-skewed (skew 4.66, kurtosis 25.11) with the mean (172,294.63) more than double the median (73,754) and a max of 2,615,575 against a Q3 of 180,553, plus 223 flagged outliers.

Treatment: Impute or flag the 69% missing rows and log-transform before modelling to tame the heavy right tail.

anthropic:claude-opus-4-7 · confidence high
Out[127]:

saturn.columns["Total Call Center Volume (Number of Calls)"].stats

statvalue
n10,302
nulls7,159 (69.5%)
unique1,592
min 5,750
max 2.616e+06
mean 1.723e+05
median 73,754
std 3.191e+05
q1 3.132e+04
q3 180,553
iqr 1.492e+05
skew 4.656
kurtosis 25.11
n_outliers 223
outlier_rate 0.07095
zero_rate 0
alert: null_rate69.5% null
alert: high_skewskew=+4.66
alert: outliers7.1% rows beyond 1.5 IQR
Fig 46.
Distribution of Total Call Center Volume (Number of Calls). Vertical dash marks the median.
Show data table
Histogram bins for Total Call Center Volume (Number of Calls) (median: 73754.0).
bincount
5750 – 7.1e+041556
7.1e+04 – 1.362e+05576
1.362e+05 – 2.015e+05313
2.015e+05 – 2.667e+05235
2.667e+05 – 3.32e+05167
3.32e+05 – 3.972e+0569
3.972e+05 – 4.625e+0526
4.625e+05 – 5.277e+056
5.277e+05 – 5.93e+0510
5.93e+05 – 6.582e+0523
6.582e+05 – 7.235e+0524
7.235e+05 – 7.887e+0525
7.887e+05 – 8.539e+056
8.539e+05 – 9.192e+0510
9.192e+05 – 9.844e+058
9.844e+05 – 1.05e+066
1.05e+06 – 1.115e+064
1.115e+06 – 1.18e+0610
1.18e+06 – 1.245e+066
1.245e+06 – 1.311e+064
1.311e+06 – 1.376e+060
1.376e+06 – 1.441e+060
1.441e+06 – 1.506e+062
1.506e+06 – 1.572e+062
1.572e+06 – 1.637e+060
1.637e+06 – 1.702e+064
1.702e+06 – 1.767e+060
1.767e+06 – 1.833e+066
1.833e+06 – 1.898e+063
1.898e+06 – 1.963e+068
1.963e+06 – 2.028e+066
2.028e+06 – 2.094e+064
2.094e+06 – 2.159e+062
2.159e+06 – 2.224e+062
2.224e+06 – 2.289e+066
2.289e+06 – 2.355e+062
2.355e+06 – 2.42e+062
2.42e+06 – 2.485e+062
2.485e+06 – 2.55e+064
2.55e+06 – 2.616e+064

Total Call Center Volume (Number of Calls) - footnotes categorical metadata

This column holds free-form footnotes qualifying the Total Call Center Volume metric, with 27 distinct semicolon-joined caveats describing what each call count does or doesn't include. 70.96% of rows are null, meaning most volume figures carry no caveat, but among the 2,994 annotated rows the disclaimers are spread broadly (entropy ratio 0.787) with the most common note ('Does not include all calls received after business hours; Includes calls for other benefit programs') covering only 20.09% of non-nulls. The recurring themes — excluded after-hours calls, bundled benefit programs, and live-agent-only counts — signal that the underlying volume metric is not comparable across rows without parsing these flags.

Treatment: Split on '; ' into binary caveat flags and use them to gate or adjust comparisons of the call-volume metric.

anthropic:claude-opus-4-7 · confidence high
Out[130]:

saturn.columns["Total Call Center Volume (Number of Calls) - footnotes"].stats

statvalue
n10,302
nulls7,310 (71.0%)
unique27
top_value Does not include all calls received after business hours; Includes calls for other benefit programs
top_rate 0.2009
cardinality 27
entropy 3.742
entropy_ratio 0.787
alert: null_rate71.0% null
Fig 47.
Top values for Total Call Center Volume (Number of Calls) - footnotes.
Show data table
Top values for Total Call Center Volume (Number of Calls) - footnotes (20 unique shown, of 27 total).
valuecountshare
Does not include all calls received after business hours; Includes calls for other benefit programs6015.8%
Includes calls for other benefit programs4354.2%
Does not include all calls received after business hours4184.1%
Does not include all calls received by call centers; Does not include all calls received after business hours3032.9%
Includes calls for other benefit programs; Includes only calls transferred to a live agent1871.8%
Does not include all calls received by call centers; Does not include all calls received after business hours; Includes only calls transferred to a live agent1321.3%
Does not include all calls received by call centers1101.1%
Does not include all calls received by call centers; Includes calls for other benefit programs830.8%
Does not include all calls received by call centers; Does not include all calls received after business hours; Includes calls for other benefit programs740.7%
Does not include all calls received after business hours; Includes only calls transferred to a live agent630.6%
Includes state-based marketplace (SBM) data630.6%
Does not include all calls received after business hours; Includes calls for other benefit programs; Includes only calls transferred to a live agent630.6%
Does not include all calls received by call centers; Includes calls for other benefit programs; Includes state-based marketplace (SBM) data630.6%
Does not include all calls received by call centers; Does not include all calls received after business hours; Includes calls for other benefit programs; Includes state-based marketplace (SBM) data630.6%
Does not include all calls received by call centers; Includes only calls transferred to a live agent630.6%
Does not include all calls received by call centers; Does not include all calls received after business hours; Includes state-based marketplace (SBM) data630.6%
Does not operate a call center630.6%
Does not include all calls received after business hours; Includes calls for other benefit programs; Includes state-based marketplace (SBM) data630.6%
Does not include all calls received after business hours; Includes state-based marketplace (SBM) data600.6%
Did not report data because of technical reasons50.0%

Average Call Center Wait Time (Minutes) numeric feature

This column captures the average call-center wait time in minutes per record, but it's only populated for ~30% of rows (null_rate 0.6947). Values range from 0 to 72 minutes with a median of 5 and mean of 9.95, showing a strong right skew (1.78) and 11.6% zeros. About 145 records (4.6%) are flagged as outliers, consistent with a long tail of unusually long waits.

Treatment: Impute or flag missingness, then log-transform to tame the right skew before modelling.

anthropic:claude-opus-4-7 · confidence high
Out[133]:

saturn.columns["Average Call Center Wait Time (Minutes)"].stats

statvalue
n10,302
nulls7,157 (69.5%)
unique63
min 0
max 72
mean 9.945
median 5
std 12.2
q1 1
q3 15
iqr 14
skew 1.78
kurtosis 3.29
n_outliers 145
outlier_rate 0.0461
zero_rate 0.1161
alert: null_rate69.5% null
Fig 48.
Distribution of Average Call Center Wait Time (Minutes). Vertical dash marks the median.
Show data table
Histogram bins for Average Call Center Wait Time (Minutes) (median: 5.0).
bincount
0 – 1.8942
1.8 – 3.6417
3.6 – 5.4329
5.4 – 7.2188
7.2 – 980
9 – 10.8116
10.8 – 12.6168
12.6 – 14.4103
14.4 – 16.2106
16.2 – 1843
18 – 19.886
19.8 – 21.675
21.6 – 23.473
23.4 – 25.250
25.2 – 2720
27 – 28.844
28.8 – 30.648
30.6 – 32.447
32.4 – 34.238
34.2 – 3615
36 – 37.828
37.8 – 39.628
39.6 – 41.46
41.4 – 43.215
43.2 – 4512
45 – 46.814
46.8 – 48.610
48.6 – 50.42
50.4 – 52.24
52.2 – 542
54 – 55.80
55.8 – 57.610
57.6 – 59.412
59.4 – 61.23
61.2 – 632
63 – 64.82
64.8 – 66.64
66.6 – 68.40
68.4 – 70.20
70.2 – 723

Average Call Center Wait Time (Minutes) - footnotes categorical metadata

This is a footnote/caveat field qualifying the 'Average Call Center Wait Time (Minutes)' metric, holding semicolon-joined methodological notes (e.g., callbacks included, after-hours exclusions, other benefit programs counted). 69.73% of rows are null, yet across the 30.27% populated there are 44 distinct combinations with very high entropy ratio (0.918) and no dominant value—the top combination only covers 7.89%. The notes themselves reveal non-comparable measurement methods across rows, which undermines straight comparisons of the wait-time metric.

Treatment: Split on '; ' into boolean flags per caveat and use to stratify or adjust comparisons of the wait-time metric.

anthropic:claude-opus-4-7 · confidence high
Out[136]:

saturn.columns["Average Call Center Wait Time (Minutes) - footnotes"].stats

statvalue
n10,302
nulls7,184 (69.7%)
unique44
top_value Call centers offer callbacks; Includes calls for other benefit programs; Includes only calls transferred to a live agent
top_rate 0.0789
cardinality 44
entropy 5.013
entropy_ratio 0.9183
alert: null_rate69.7% null
Fig 49.
Top values for Average Call Center Wait Time (Minutes) - footnotes.
Show data table
Top values for Average Call Center Wait Time (Minutes) - footnotes (20 unique shown, of 44 total).
valuecountshare
Call centers offer callbacks; Includes calls for other benefit programs; Includes only calls transferred to a live agent2462.4%
Does not include all calls received after business hours; Includes only calls transferred to a live agent1841.8%
Includes calls for other benefit programs; Includes only calls transferred to a live agent1711.7%
Does not include all calls received after business hours; Includes calls for other benefit programs; Includes only calls transferred to a live agent1401.4%
Does not include all calls received by call centers; Does not include all calls received after business hours; Includes only calls transferred to a live agent1321.3%
Call centers offer callbacks; Does not include all calls received after business hours1281.2%
Does not include all calls received after business hours; Includes calls for other benefit programs1261.2%
Call centers offer callbacks; Does not include all calls received after business hours; Includes calls for other benefit programs; Includes only calls transferred to a live agent1261.2%
Callbacks are included; Call centers offer callbacks; Does not include all calls received after business hours; Includes only calls transferred to a live agent1261.2%
Callbacks are included; Call centers offer callbacks; Does not include all calls received by call centers; Does not include all calls received after business hours; Includes only calls transferred to a live agent1091.1%
Callbacks are included; Call centers offer callbacks; Does not include all calls received after business hours; Includes calls for other benefit programs991.0%
Call centers offer callbacks; Does not include all calls received after business hours; Includes only calls transferred to a live agent981.0%
Callbacks are included; Call centers offer callbacks; Does not include all calls received after business hours; Includes calls for other benefit programs; Includes only calls transferred to a live agent981.0%
Call centers offer callbacks; Does not include all calls received by call centers; Does not include all calls received after business hours; Includes only calls transferred to a live agent870.8%
Callbacks are included; Call centers offer callbacks; Does not include all calls received by call centers; Does not include all calls received after business hours; Includes calls for other benefit programs; Includes only calls transferred to a live agent700.7%
Call centers offer callbacks; Does not include all calls received by call centers690.7%
Call centers offer callbacks; Does not include all calls received after business hours; Includes only calls transferred to a live agent; Includes state-based marketplace (SBM) data630.6%
Callbacks are included; Call centers offer callbacks; Includes calls for other benefit programs; Includes only calls transferred to a live agent630.6%
Callbacks are included; Call centers offer callbacks; Includes calls for other benefit programs630.6%
Callbacks are included; Call centers offer callbacks; Does not include all calls received by call centers; Includes calls for other benefit programs; Includes only calls transferred to a live agent; Includes state-based marketplace (SBM) data630.6%

Average Call Center Abandonment Rate numeric feature

This is a numeric operational metric capturing call center abandonment rate, ranging from 0.0 to 0.652 with a median of 0.088 and mean of 0.132. The distribution is right-skewed (skew 1.22) with 54 outliers (1.7%) and a heavy null rate of 69.49%, meaning only about 30% of rows carry a value.

Treatment: Impute or add a missingness flag given 69% nulls, then consider a log or sqrt transform before modelling.

anthropic:claude-opus-4-7 · confidence high
Out[139]:

saturn.columns["Average Call Center Abandonment Rate"].stats

statvalue
n10,302
nulls7,159 (69.5%)
unique408
min 0
max 0.652
mean 0.1321
median 0.088
std 0.1291
q1 0.024
q3 0.2115
iqr 0.1875
skew 1.222
kurtosis 1.146
n_outliers 54
outlier_rate 0.01718
zero_rate 0.0009545
alert: null_rate69.5% null
Fig 50.
Distribution of Average Call Center Abandonment Rate. Vertical dash marks the median.
Show data table
Histogram bins for Average Call Center Abandonment Rate (median: 0.088).
bincount
0 – 0.0163594
0.0163 – 0.0326328
0.0326 – 0.0489200
0.0489 – 0.0652193
0.0652 – 0.0815202
0.0815 – 0.0978129
0.0978 – 0.1141123
0.1141 – 0.1304120
0.1304 – 0.146792
0.1467 – 0.163106
0.163 – 0.179387
0.1793 – 0.1956104
0.1956 – 0.211979
0.2119 – 0.2282122
0.2282 – 0.2445108
0.2445 – 0.260868
0.2608 – 0.277165
0.2771 – 0.293440
0.2934 – 0.309739
0.3097 – 0.32645
0.326 – 0.342343
0.3423 – 0.358626
0.3586 – 0.374950
0.3749 – 0.391224
0.3912 – 0.407514
0.4075 – 0.423828
0.4238 – 0.440118
0.4401 – 0.456420
0.4564 – 0.472716
0.4727 – 0.4892
0.489 – 0.505310
0.5053 – 0.521610
0.5216 – 0.53798
0.5379 – 0.55424
0.5542 – 0.57058
0.5705 – 0.58680
0.5868 – 0.60314
0.6031 – 0.61942
0.6194 – 0.63576
0.6357 – 0.6526

Average Call Center Abandonment Rate - footnotes categorical metadata

Free-text footnotes qualifying the call-center abandonment-rate metric, listing methodological caveats (e.g., excluded after-hours calls, included other-benefit calls, live-agent-only transfers) often concatenated with semicolons. 69.73% of rows are null, meaning most records carry no caveat, while the 30% that do spread across 36 distinct combinations with high entropy ratio 0.833 and no dominant value (top share only 12.54%). The combinatorial pattern suggests these are composed from a small set of base caveats rather than free prose.

Treatment: Split on '; ' into a multi-hot caveat flag set rather than treating as a single category.

anthropic:claude-opus-4-7 · confidence high
Out[142]:

saturn.columns["Average Call Center Abandonment Rate - footnotes"].stats

statvalue
n10,302
nulls7,184 (69.7%)
unique36
top_value Does not include all calls received by call centers; Does not include all calls received after business hours; Includes only calls transferred to a live agent
top_rate 0.1254
cardinality 36
entropy 4.307
entropy_ratio 0.8332
alert: null_rate69.7% null
Fig 51.
Top values for Average Call Center Abandonment Rate - footnotes.
Show data table
Top values for Average Call Center Abandonment Rate - footnotes (20 unique shown, of 36 total).
valuecountshare
Does not include all calls received by call centers; Does not include all calls received after business hours; Includes only calls transferred to a live agent3913.8%
Includes calls for other benefit programs; Includes only calls transferred to a live agent3543.4%
Does not include all calls received after business hours; Includes calls for other benefit programs; Includes only calls transferred to a live agent3083.0%
Does not include all calls received after business hours; Includes only calls transferred to a live agent2102.0%
Includes calls for other benefit programs2052.0%
Does not include all calls received after business hours2001.9%
Does not include all calls received after business hours; Includes calls for other benefit programs1701.7%
Does not include all calls received by call centers; Includes only calls transferred to a live agent1241.2%
Does not include all calls received after business hours; Includes only calls transferred to a live agent; Includes state-based marketplace (SBM) data1231.2%
Does not include all calls received by call centers; Does not include all calls received after business hours; Includes calls for other benefit programs; Includes only calls transferred to a live agent1131.1%
Does not include all calls received by call centers; Includes calls for other benefit programs; Includes only calls transferred to a live agent830.8%
Callbacks are included; Does not include all calls received after business hours; Includes calls for other benefit programs780.8%
Callbacks are included; Includes calls for other benefit programs; Includes only calls transferred to a live agent630.6%
Does not include all calls received by call centers; Includes calls for other benefit programs; Includes only calls transferred to a live agent; Includes state-based marketplace (SBM) data630.6%
Does not include all calls received by call centers; Does not include all calls received after business hours; Includes calls for other benefit programs; Includes state-based marketplace (SBM) data630.6%
Does not include all calls received by call centers; Does not include all calls received after business hours; Includes only calls transferred to a live agent; Includes state-based marketplace (SBM) data630.6%
Callbacks are included; Does not include all calls received after business hours; Includes only calls transferred to a live agent630.6%
Does not operate a call center630.6%
Callbacks are included; Does not include all calls received after business hours630.6%
Does not include all calls received after business hours; Includes calls for other benefit programs; Includes only calls transferred to a live agent; Includes state-based marketplace (SBM) data630.6%

How to cite

click to copy

BibTeX
@misc{saturn-accessibility-atlas-cms-medicaid-enrollment-2026-2026,
  author       = {Steuber, Luke},
  title        = {Saturn reading: accessibility atlas cms medicaid enrollment 2026},
  year         ={2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://dr.eamer.dev/saturn/view/accessibility-atlas-cms_medicaid_enrollment_2026}},
  note         = {Profiled with saturn-dissect v0.2.0, prompt saturn-insight-v2, model anthropic:claude-opus-4-7},
}
APA
Steuber, L. (2026). Saturn reading: accessibility atlas cms medicaid enrollment 2026. Source: /home/coolhand/datasets/accessibility-atlas/cms_medicaid_enrollment_2026.csv. Profiled with saturn-dissect v0.2.0 (saturn-insight-v2, anthropic:claude-opus-4-7). Retrieved from https://dr.eamer.dev/saturn/view/accessibility-atlas-cms_medicaid_enrollment_2026