saturn·

nationwide census counties nationwide

saturn notebook · generated 2026-05-01 Report Notebook

Overview

Source: /home/coolhand/html/datavis/data_trove/data/geographic/nationwide/census_counties_nationwide.csv

Saturn profiled 3,144 rows across 8 columns. The stats below are deterministic and machine-readable; the prose is a language-model interpretation of those stats (opt-in, added after the fact, never sees raw rows).

[2]:
!pip install saturn-dissect
import subprocess
subprocess.run([
    "saturn", "analyze", "/home/coolhand/html/datavis/data_trove/data/geographic/nationwide/census_counties_nationwide.csv",
    "--findings", "nationwide-census_counties_nationwide.json",
    "--llm", "anthropic:claude-opus-4-7",
])

Summary confidence: high

This dataset covers 3,144 U.S. counties with demographic and socioeconomic indicators including population, median income, college attainment rate, and poverty rate, identified by FIPS codes and state. The most urgent issue is median_income: it has a minimum of -666,666,666 and a mean of -148,752, which are clearly sentinel values for missing data masquerading as numbers and must be cleaned before any analysis. Population is also extremely right-skewed (skew ~13, max ~9.9M vs median ~25,785), so log-scaling will be necessary for any visualization or modeling. State coverage is uneven, with Texas (254 counties), Georgia (159), and Virginia (133) dominating the row counts. College and poverty rates are the cleanest fields and behave roughly as expected for county-level distributions.

citing: median_income · population · state_name · college_rate · poverty_rate · county_fips

Out[4]:

saturn.schema() · 8 columns

column kind n null% unique alerts
name text 3,144 0.0% 3,144 near_unique
state_fips numeric 3,144 0.0% 51
county_fips numeric 3,144 0.0% 329 high_skew outliers
state_name categorical 3,144 0.0% 51
median_income numeric 3,144 0.0% 3,021 high_skew
poverty_rate numeric 3,144 0.0% 3,144
college_rate numeric 3,144 0.0% 3,143
population numeric 3,144 0.0% 3,080 high_skew outliers
Fig 1.
state_name · Counties per state — note Texas, Georgia, and Virginia are heavily over-represented.
Show data table
Top values for state_name (20 unique shown, of 51 total).
valuecountshare
Texas2548.1%
Georgia1595.1%
Virginia1334.2%
Kentucky1203.8%
Missouri1153.7%
Kansas1053.3%
Illinois1023.2%
North Carolina1003.2%
Iowa993.1%
Tennessee953.0%
Nebraska933.0%
Indiana922.9%
Ohio882.8%
Minnesota872.8%
Michigan832.6%
Mississippi822.6%
Oklahoma772.4%
Arkansas752.4%
Wisconsin722.3%
Alabama672.1%
Fig 2.
population · Population is extremely right-skewed; consider a log scale to see the bulk of small counties.
Show data table
Histogram bins for population (median: 25784.5).
bincount
50 – 2.485e+052863
2.485e+05 – 4.969e+05137
4.969e+05 – 7.453e+0557
7.453e+05 – 9.937e+0537
9.937e+05 – 1.242e+0614
1.242e+06 – 1.491e+0610
1.491e+06 – 1.739e+067
1.739e+06 – 1.987e+063
1.987e+06 – 2.236e+063
2.236e+06 – 2.484e+064
2.484e+06 – 2.733e+063
2.733e+06 – 2.981e+060
2.981e+06 – 3.229e+061
3.229e+06 – 3.478e+061
3.478e+06 – 3.726e+060
3.726e+06 – 3.975e+060
3.975e+06 – 4.223e+060
4.223e+06 – 4.472e+061
4.472e+06 – 4.72e+060
4.72e+06 – 4.968e+061
4.968e+06 – 5.217e+060
5.217e+06 – 5.465e+061
5.465e+06 – 5.714e+060
5.714e+06 – 5.962e+060
5.962e+06 – 6.21e+060
6.21e+06 – 6.459e+060
6.459e+06 – 6.707e+060
6.707e+06 – 6.956e+060
6.956e+06 – 7.204e+060
7.204e+06 – 7.453e+060
7.453e+06 – 7.701e+060
7.701e+06 – 7.949e+060
7.949e+06 – 8.198e+060
8.198e+06 – 8.446e+060
8.446e+06 – 8.695e+060
8.695e+06 – 8.943e+060
8.943e+06 – 9.191e+060
9.191e+06 – 9.44e+060
9.44e+06 – 9.688e+060
9.688e+06 – 9.937e+061
Fig 3.
median_income · Watch for sentinel values like -666666666 dragging the mean negative — these need to be filtered.
Show data table
Histogram bins for median_income (median: 60931.0).
bincount
-6.667e+08 – -6.5e+081
-6.5e+08 – -6.333e+080
-6.333e+08 – -6.167e+080
-6.167e+08 – -6e+080
-6e+08 – -5.833e+080
-5.833e+08 – -5.666e+080
-5.666e+08 – -5.5e+080
-5.5e+08 – -5.333e+080
-5.333e+08 – -5.166e+080
-5.166e+08 – -5e+080
-5e+08 – -4.833e+080
-4.833e+08 – -4.666e+080
-4.666e+08 – -4.499e+080
-4.499e+08 – -4.333e+080
-4.333e+08 – -4.166e+080
-4.166e+08 – -3.999e+080
-3.999e+08 – -3.833e+080
-3.833e+08 – -3.666e+080
-3.666e+08 – -3.499e+080
-3.499e+08 – -3.332e+080
-3.332e+08 – -3.166e+080
-3.166e+08 – -2.999e+080
-2.999e+08 – -2.832e+080
-2.832e+08 – -2.666e+080
-2.666e+08 – -2.499e+080
-2.499e+08 – -2.332e+080
-2.332e+08 – -2.166e+080
-2.166e+08 – -1.999e+080
-1.999e+08 – -1.832e+080
-1.832e+08 – -1.665e+080
-1.665e+08 – -1.499e+080
-1.499e+08 – -1.332e+080
-1.332e+08 – -1.165e+080
-1.165e+08 – -9.986e+070
-9.986e+07 – -8.318e+070
-8.318e+07 – -6.651e+070
-6.651e+07 – -4.984e+070
-4.984e+07 – -3.317e+070
-3.317e+07 – -1.65e+070
-1.65e+07 – 1.705e+053143
Fig 4.
poverty_rate · A cleaner distribution centered near 13% with a moderate right tail of high-poverty counties.
Show data table
Histogram bins for poverty_rate (median: 12.951799620723307).
bincount
1.603 – 2.9416
2.941 – 4.27820
4.278 – 5.61664
5.616 – 6.953149
6.953 – 8.291227
8.291 – 9.628300
9.628 – 10.97313
10.97 – 12.3361
12.3 – 13.64308
13.64 – 14.98260
14.98 – 16.32259
16.32 – 17.65216
17.65 – 18.99151
18.99 – 20.33118
20.33 – 21.6695
21.66 – 2394
23 – 24.3451
24.34 – 25.6840
25.68 – 27.0132
27.01 – 28.3520
28.35 – 29.6918
29.69 – 31.0312
31.03 – 32.369
32.36 – 33.76
33.7 – 35.042
35.04 – 36.383
36.38 – 37.712
37.71 – 39.051
39.05 – 40.391
40.39 – 41.731
41.73 – 43.061
43.06 – 44.41
44.4 – 45.740
45.74 – 47.081
47.08 – 48.410
48.41 – 49.750
49.75 – 51.090
51.09 – 52.431
52.43 – 53.760
53.76 – 55.11
Fig 5.
college_rate · Right-skewed distribution showing most counties below 20% college attainment with a long tail of educated outliers.
Show data table
Histogram bins for college_rate (median: 14.596317224797893).
bincount
0 – 1.4091
1.409 – 2.8171
2.817 – 4.2264
4.226 – 5.63513
5.635 – 7.04344
7.043 – 8.452142
8.452 – 9.861225
9.861 – 11.27305
11.27 – 12.68368
12.68 – 14.09357
14.09 – 15.5296
15.5 – 16.9273
16.9 – 18.31202
18.31 – 19.72161
19.72 – 21.13143
21.13 – 22.54103
22.54 – 23.9595
23.95 – 25.3688
25.36 – 26.7657
26.76 – 28.1751
28.17 – 29.5840
29.58 – 30.9937
30.99 – 32.428
32.4 – 33.8122
33.81 – 35.2212
35.22 – 36.6317
36.63 – 38.0312
38.03 – 39.4412
39.44 – 40.8512
40.85 – 42.267
42.26 – 43.672
43.67 – 45.083
45.08 – 46.492
46.49 – 47.891
47.89 – 49.33
49.3 – 50.713
50.71 – 52.120
52.12 – 53.531
53.53 – 54.940
54.94 – 56.351
Fig 6.
Per-column null rate across the corpus. Columns are ordered by input position.
Show data table
Per-column null rate across the corpus.
columnkindnull %
nametext0.0%
state_fipsnumeric0.0%
county_fipsnumeric0.0%
state_namecategorical0.0%
median_incomenumeric0.0%
poverty_ratenumeric0.0%
college_ratenumeric0.0%
populationnumeric0.0%
Fig 7.
Pearson correlation across numeric columns (sampled, bounded).
Show data table
Pearson correlation across 6 numeric columns (values clipped to 2 decimals).
state_fipscounty_fipsmedian_incomepoverty_ratecollege_ratepopulation
state_fips+1.00+0.13-0.05-0.15+0.03-0.08
county_fips+0.13+1.00-0.08+0.03-0.07-0.05
median_income-0.05-0.08+1.00+0.07+0.11+0.01
poverty_rate-0.15+0.03+0.07+1.00-0.50-0.05
college_rate+0.03-0.07+0.11-0.50+1.00+0.21
population-0.08-0.05+0.01-0.05+0.21+1.00

name text identifier

This is the full name of a US county-state pair: 2999 of 3144 rows contain the word 'county,' and the remaining top tokens are state names (Texas 256, Virginia 189, Georgia 159). Every value is unique (n_unique=3144, duplicate_rate=0.0) with no nulls and a tight length band (min 16, mean 24.2, max 59). It functions as a row identifier rather than a modelling feature.

Treatment: Use as the row key for joins; do not feed into models.

anthropic:claude-opus-4-7 · confidence high
Out[13]:

saturn.columns["name"].stats

statvalue
n3,144
nulls0 (0.0%)
unique3,144
len_min 16
len_max 59
len_mean 24.16
len_median 24
len_p95 30.85
word_mean 3.224
word_median 3
n_empty 0
n_duplicates 0
duplicate_rate 0
vocab_size 1,910
readability_flesch_mean 6.826
emoji_rate 0
url_rate 0
one_word_rate 0
allcaps_rate 0
boilerplate_rate 0
alert: near_unique100.0% of rows are unique strings
Fig 8.
Character-length distribution for name.
Show data table
Character-length distribution for name (mean: 24.164758269720103).
charscount
16 – 1726
17 – 1872
18 – 19121
19 – 20190
20 – 21264
21 – 22407
22 – 24420
24 – 25363
25 – 26320
26 – 27240
27 – 28230
28 – 29142
29 – 30126
30 – 31133
31 – 3235
32 – 3323
33 – 3412
34 – 356
35 – 362
36 – 380
38 – 391
39 – 401
40 – 410
41 – 421
42 – 431
43 – 440
44 – 452
45 – 460
46 – 471
47 – 481
48 – 490
49 – 500
50 – 510
51 – 530
53 – 542
54 – 551
55 – 560
56 – 570
57 – 580
58 – 591

state_fips numeric foreign_key

Numeric column with exactly 51 unique values across 3144 rows, ranging 1 to 56 with no nulls — this is the U.S. state FIPS code (50 states plus DC), and 3144 matches the U.S. county count. The mean (30.26) and median (29) sit near the middle of the code range, and the near-zero skew (-0.08) reflects roughly uniform coverage of states. Despite being stored as numeric, the values are categorical identifiers, not measurements.

Treatment: Cast to categorical or zero-padded string and use as a join key to state-level reference tables; do not treat as a continuous feature.

anthropic:claude-opus-4-7 · confidence high
Out[16]:

saturn.columns["state_fips"].stats

statvalue
n3,144
nulls0 (0.0%)
unique51
min 1
max 56
mean 30.26
median 29
std 15.15
q1 18
q3 45
iqr 27
skew -0.08128
kurtosis -1.099
n_outliers 0
outlier_rate 0
zero_rate 0
Fig 9.
Distribution of state_fips. Vertical dash marks the median.
Show data table
Histogram bins for state_fips (median: 29.0).
bincount
1 – 2.37597
2.375 – 3.750
3.75 – 5.12590
5.125 – 6.558
6.5 – 7.8750
7.875 – 9.2573
9.25 – 10.623
10.62 – 121
12 – 13.38226
13.38 – 14.750
14.75 – 16.1249
16.12 – 17.5102
17.5 – 18.8892
18.88 – 20.25204
20.25 – 21.62120
21.62 – 2364
23 – 24.3840
24.38 – 25.7514
25.75 – 27.12170
27.12 – 28.582
28.5 – 29.88115
29.88 – 31.25149
31.25 – 32.6217
32.62 – 3410
34 – 35.3854
35.38 – 36.7562
36.75 – 38.12153
38.12 – 39.588
39.5 – 40.8877
40.88 – 42.25103
42.25 – 43.620
43.62 – 455
45 – 46.38112
46.38 – 47.7595
47.75 – 49.12283
49.12 – 50.514
50.5 – 51.88133
51.88 – 53.2539
53.25 – 54.6255
54.62 – 5695

county_fips numeric identifier

This is the county-level component of a FIPS code stored as an integer, with 3144 rows and only 329 unique values, suggesting many counties share the same within-state numeric suffix. Values run from 1 to 840 with a median of 79, but the high skew (2.84) and 176 outliers (5.6%) reflect the long tail of larger county codes used in a few states rather than a true distribution. There are no nulls or zeros.

Treatment: Treat as a categorical code; concatenate with a state FIPS to form a unique county key for joins.

anthropic:claude-opus-4-7 · confidence high
Out[19]:

saturn.columns["county_fips"].stats

statvalue
n3,144
nulls0 (0.0%)
unique329
min 1
max 840
mean 103.9
median 79
std 107.6
q1 35
q3 133.5
iqr 98.5
skew 2.841
kurtosis 11.38
n_outliers 176
outlier_rate 0.05598
zero_rate 0
alert: high_skewskew=+2.84
alert: outliers5.6% rows beyond 1.5 IQR
Fig 10.
Distribution of county_fips. Vertical dash marks the median.
Show data table
Histogram bins for county_fips (median: 79.0).
bincount
1 – 21.98512
21.98 – 42.95408
42.95 – 63.93399
63.93 – 84.9335
84.9 – 105.9341
105.9 – 126.9271
126.9 – 147.8225
147.8 – 168.8165
168.8 – 189.8140
189.8 – 210.871
210.8 – 231.745
231.7 – 252.725
252.7 – 273.722
273.7 – 294.723
294.7 – 315.622
315.6 – 336.613
336.6 – 357.611
357.6 – 378.610
378.6 – 399.511
399.5 – 420.510
420.5 – 441.511
441.5 – 462.510
462.5 – 483.411
483.4 – 504.410
504.4 – 525.47
525.4 – 546.42
546.4 – 567.31
567.3 – 588.32
588.3 – 609.33
609.3 – 630.23
630.2 – 651.22
651.2 – 672.22
672.2 – 693.25
693.2 – 714.22
714.2 – 735.13
735.1 – 756.12
756.1 – 777.13
777.1 – 798.11
798.1 – 8192
819 – 8403

state_name categorical feature

This column holds US state names, with 51 distinct values across 3,144 rows and no nulls — consistent with a county-level dataset covering all states plus DC. Distribution mirrors county counts: Texas leads at 254 (8.08%), followed by Georgia (159) and Virginia (133), and entropy ratio of 0.93 indicates a fairly even spread across states. No anomalies flagged.

Treatment: Use as a categorical grouping key or one-hot/target-encode for modelling.

anthropic:claude-opus-4-7 · confidence high
Out[22]:

saturn.columns["state_name"].stats

statvalue
n3,144
nulls0 (0.0%)
unique51
top_value Texas
top_rate 0.08079
cardinality 51
entropy 5.277
entropy_ratio 0.9304
Fig 11.
Top values for state_name.
Show data table
Top values for state_name (20 unique shown, of 51 total).
valuecountshare
Texas2548.1%
Georgia1595.1%
Virginia1334.2%
Kentucky1203.8%
Missouri1153.7%
Kansas1053.3%
Illinois1023.2%
North Carolina1003.2%
Iowa993.1%
Tennessee953.0%
Nebraska933.0%
Indiana922.9%
Ohio882.8%
Minnesota872.8%
Michigan832.6%
Mississippi822.6%
Oklahoma772.4%
Arkansas752.4%
Wisconsin722.3%
Alabama672.1%

median_income numeric feature

This column appears to be county-level median household income in dollars, with a median of 60931 and IQR spanning 52544.5 to 70605.25. The minimum of -666666666 is a sentinel value masquerading as data, dragging the mean to -148752.33 and producing a skew of -56.04 and kurtosis of 3138.99. Aside from that contamination, 3021 unique values across 3144 rows and 135 outliers (4.29%) suggest an otherwise plausible distribution capped at 170463.

Treatment: Replace the -666666666 sentinel with null, then consider log or robust scaling before modelling.

anthropic:claude-opus-4-7 · confidence high
Out[25]:

saturn.columns["median_income"].stats

statvalue
n3,144
nulls0 (0.0%)
unique3,021
min -6.667e+08
max 170,463
mean -1.488e+05
median 60,931
std 1.189e+07
q1 5.254e+04
q3 7.061e+04
iqr 1.806e+04
skew -56.04
kurtosis 3139
n_outliers 135
outlier_rate 0.04294
zero_rate 0
alert: high_skewskew=-56.04
Fig 12.
Distribution of median_income. Vertical dash marks the median.
Show data table
Histogram bins for median_income (median: 60931.0).
bincount
-6.667e+08 – -6.5e+081
-6.5e+08 – -6.333e+080
-6.333e+08 – -6.167e+080
-6.167e+08 – -6e+080
-6e+08 – -5.833e+080
-5.833e+08 – -5.666e+080
-5.666e+08 – -5.5e+080
-5.5e+08 – -5.333e+080
-5.333e+08 – -5.166e+080
-5.166e+08 – -5e+080
-5e+08 – -4.833e+080
-4.833e+08 – -4.666e+080
-4.666e+08 – -4.499e+080
-4.499e+08 – -4.333e+080
-4.333e+08 – -4.166e+080
-4.166e+08 – -3.999e+080
-3.999e+08 – -3.833e+080
-3.833e+08 – -3.666e+080
-3.666e+08 – -3.499e+080
-3.499e+08 – -3.332e+080
-3.332e+08 – -3.166e+080
-3.166e+08 – -2.999e+080
-2.999e+08 – -2.832e+080
-2.832e+08 – -2.666e+080
-2.666e+08 – -2.499e+080
-2.499e+08 – -2.332e+080
-2.332e+08 – -2.166e+080
-2.166e+08 – -1.999e+080
-1.999e+08 – -1.832e+080
-1.832e+08 – -1.665e+080
-1.665e+08 – -1.499e+080
-1.499e+08 – -1.332e+080
-1.332e+08 – -1.165e+080
-1.165e+08 – -9.986e+070
-9.986e+07 – -8.318e+070
-8.318e+07 – -6.651e+070
-6.651e+07 – -4.984e+070
-4.984e+07 – -3.317e+070
-3.317e+07 – -1.65e+070
-1.65e+07 – 1.705e+053143

poverty_rate numeric feature

Numeric poverty_rate spanning 1.60 to 55.10 with mean 13.82 and median 12.95, suggesting a percentage-style measure across 3144 rows (no nulls, no zeros). Distribution is right-skewed (skew 1.15, kurtosis 2.90) with 74 high-end outliers (2.35%) stretching the tail well past the Q3 of 16.77. Every one of the 3144 values is unique, consistent with a per-geography rate (e.g., one row per US county).

Treatment: Consider a log or winsorising transform before regression to tame the right tail.

anthropic:claude-opus-4-7 · confidence high
Out[28]:

saturn.columns["poverty_rate"].stats

statvalue
n3,144
nulls0 (0.0%)
unique3,144
min 1.603
max 55.1
mean 13.82
median 12.95
std 5.702
q1 9.699
q3 16.77
iqr 7.074
skew 1.15
kurtosis 2.901
n_outliers 74
outlier_rate 0.02354
zero_rate 0
Fig 13.
Distribution of poverty_rate. Vertical dash marks the median.
Show data table
Histogram bins for poverty_rate (median: 12.951799620723307).
bincount
1.603 – 2.9416
2.941 – 4.27820
4.278 – 5.61664
5.616 – 6.953149
6.953 – 8.291227
8.291 – 9.628300
9.628 – 10.97313
10.97 – 12.3361
12.3 – 13.64308
13.64 – 14.98260
14.98 – 16.32259
16.32 – 17.65216
17.65 – 18.99151
18.99 – 20.33118
20.33 – 21.6695
21.66 – 2394
23 – 24.3451
24.34 – 25.6840
25.68 – 27.0132
27.01 – 28.3520
28.35 – 29.6918
29.69 – 31.0312
31.03 – 32.369
32.36 – 33.76
33.7 – 35.042
35.04 – 36.383
36.38 – 37.712
37.71 – 39.051
39.05 – 40.391
40.39 – 41.731
41.73 – 43.061
43.06 – 44.41
44.4 – 45.740
45.74 – 47.081
47.08 – 48.410
48.41 – 49.750
49.75 – 51.090
51.09 – 52.431
52.43 – 53.760
53.76 – 55.11

college_rate numeric feature

Likely a percentage of college-educated residents per row (probably a US county-level rate given n=3144). Values range from 0.0 to 56.35 with mean 16.26 and median 14.60, right-skewed (skew 1.42) with 134 outliers (4.26%) on the high tail. Near-unique (3143/3144) and no nulls, with only a single zero observation.

Treatment: Use as-is or apply a mild log/sqrt transform to dampen the right skew before regression.

anthropic:claude-opus-4-7 · confidence high
Out[31]:

saturn.columns["college_rate"].stats

statvalue
n3,144
nulls0 (0.0%)
unique3,143
min 0
max 56.35
mean 16.26
median 14.6
std 7.005
q1 11.48
q3 19.37
iqr 7.892
skew 1.422
kurtosis 2.751
n_outliers 134
outlier_rate 0.04262
zero_rate 0.0003181
Fig 14.
Distribution of college_rate. Vertical dash marks the median.
Show data table
Histogram bins for college_rate (median: 14.596317224797893).
bincount
0 – 1.4091
1.409 – 2.8171
2.817 – 4.2264
4.226 – 5.63513
5.635 – 7.04344
7.043 – 8.452142
8.452 – 9.861225
9.861 – 11.27305
11.27 – 12.68368
12.68 – 14.09357
14.09 – 15.5296
15.5 – 16.9273
16.9 – 18.31202
18.31 – 19.72161
19.72 – 21.13143
21.13 – 22.54103
22.54 – 23.9595
23.95 – 25.3688
25.36 – 26.7657
26.76 – 28.1751
28.17 – 29.5840
29.58 – 30.9937
30.99 – 32.428
32.4 – 33.8122
33.81 – 35.2212
35.22 – 36.6317
36.63 – 38.0312
38.03 – 39.4412
39.44 – 40.8512
40.85 – 42.267
42.26 – 43.672
43.67 – 45.083
45.08 – 46.492
46.49 – 47.891
47.89 – 49.33
49.3 – 50.713
50.71 – 52.120
52.12 – 53.531
53.53 – 54.940
54.94 – 56.351

population numeric feature

This column reports a population count for 3,144 rows with no nulls and 3,080 unique values, consistent with one row per US county. The distribution is extremely right-skewed (skew 13.17, kurtosis 289.76): the median is 25,784.5 yet the mean is 105,310.94 and the max reaches 9,936,690, with 440 rows (14.0%) flagged as outliers. The std of 333,792 dwarfs the IQR of 57,244, confirming a heavy upper tail driven by a few very large jurisdictions.

Treatment: log-transform before regression or modelling to tame the heavy right tail.

anthropic:claude-opus-4-7 · confidence high
Out[34]:

saturn.columns["population"].stats

statvalue
n3,144
nulls0 (0.0%)
unique3,080
min 50
max 9.937e+06
mean 1.053e+05
median 2.578e+04
std 3.338e+05
q1 1.084e+04
q3 6.808e+04
iqr 57,244
skew 13.17
kurtosis 289.8
n_outliers 440
outlier_rate 0.1399
zero_rate 0
alert: high_skewskew=+13.17
alert: outliers14.0% rows beyond 1.5 IQR
Fig 15.
Distribution of population. Vertical dash marks the median.
Show data table
Histogram bins for population (median: 25784.5).
bincount
50 – 2.485e+052863
2.485e+05 – 4.969e+05137
4.969e+05 – 7.453e+0557
7.453e+05 – 9.937e+0537
9.937e+05 – 1.242e+0614
1.242e+06 – 1.491e+0610
1.491e+06 – 1.739e+067
1.739e+06 – 1.987e+063
1.987e+06 – 2.236e+063
2.236e+06 – 2.484e+064
2.484e+06 – 2.733e+063
2.733e+06 – 2.981e+060
2.981e+06 – 3.229e+061
3.229e+06 – 3.478e+061
3.478e+06 – 3.726e+060
3.726e+06 – 3.975e+060
3.975e+06 – 4.223e+060
4.223e+06 – 4.472e+061
4.472e+06 – 4.72e+060
4.72e+06 – 4.968e+061
4.968e+06 – 5.217e+060
5.217e+06 – 5.465e+061
5.465e+06 – 5.714e+060
5.714e+06 – 5.962e+060
5.962e+06 – 6.21e+060
6.21e+06 – 6.459e+060
6.459e+06 – 6.707e+060
6.707e+06 – 6.956e+060
6.956e+06 – 7.204e+060
7.204e+06 – 7.453e+060
7.453e+06 – 7.701e+060
7.701e+06 – 7.949e+060
7.949e+06 – 8.198e+060
8.198e+06 – 8.446e+060
8.446e+06 – 8.695e+060
8.695e+06 – 8.943e+060
8.943e+06 – 9.191e+060
9.191e+06 – 9.44e+060
9.44e+06 – 9.688e+060
9.688e+06 – 9.937e+061

How to cite

click to copy

BibTeX
@misc{saturn-nationwide-census-counties-nationwide-2026,
  author       = {Steuber, Luke},
  title        = {Saturn reading: nationwide census counties nationwide},
  year         ={2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://dr.eamer.dev/saturn/view/nationwide-census_counties_nationwide}},
  note         = {Profiled with saturn-dissect v0.2.0, prompt saturn-insight-v2, model anthropic:claude-opus-4-7},
}
APA
Steuber, L. (2026). Saturn reading: nationwide census counties nationwide. Source: /home/coolhand/html/datavis/data_trove/data/geographic/nationwide/census_counties_nationwide.csv. Profiled with saturn-dissect v0.2.0 (saturn-insight-v2, anthropic:claude-opus-4-7). Retrieved from https://dr.eamer.dev/saturn/view/nationwide-census_counties_nationwide