Summary confidence: high
This is a social-norms annotation dataset of 355,922 rows and 25 columns, where each entry pairs a real-life 'situation' (mostly from Reddit confessions, AmItheAsshole, Dear Abby, and ROCStories) with an 'action', a rule-of-thumb ('rot'), and a battery of moral judgments by crowd workers. The most striking shape feature is heavy duplication in the text fields: 'rot-judgment' is 97% duplicated and 'characters' 91%, because they collapse to short controlled vocabularies, while 'situation' and 'rot' themselves repeat ~71% and ~27% of the time across annotators. Worth a closer look first: the moral-foundation distribution, which is dominated by 'care-harm' (~39% of non-null), and the 'action-legal' field where 93% of actions are tagged 'legal' — both suggest class imbalance that will matter for any modeling. Also note 'area' is reasonably balanced across the four source corpora, but 'split' is heavily skewed toward 'train' (66%).
citing: rot-moral-foundations · action-legal · area · split · rot-judgment · characters · situation · rot · action-hypothetical · rot-categorization · action-agree · row_count · column_count